2
V. Patil et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
higher dose (500 mg/kg, ip), suggesting that AHAS is an essential
target for the survival of Mtb.3
However, recent studies have shown that inactivation of ilvB1
(coding for AHAS large subunit) gene in Mtb leads to BCAA auxot-
rophy and attenuation of virulence in mice. This may be due to
either uptake of BCAA from in vivo environment or ilvB1 mutant
having ability to synthesize some BCAA using an alternative mech-
anism, or combination of both.10
Based on the above studies, one would assume that inhibiting
AHAS in Mtb with a small molecule inhibitor would result in bac-
teriostatic effect in vivo and not bactericidal, such compounds
when given in combination with other anti-tuberculosis drugs
may lead to better efficacy. In fact, we have recently demonstrated
that rifampicin, a potent RNA polymerase inhibitor and one of the
front-line TB drugs, potentiates the killing effects of several of the
AHAS inhibitors in vitro.11 Therefore, the focus of the current study
was to identify potent Mtb specific AHAS inhibitors with improved
whole cell potency against Mtb.
Figure 3. Overlay of Flumetasulam (magenta) and compound 3d (yellow) onto
crystal structure (1YI0) bound conformation of sulfometuron (green).
Our approach towards designing AHAS inhibitors with im-
proved whole cell potency was to utilize the structures 1 and 2
as starting points. We hypothesized that hybridization of structural
features of sulfonylureas and triazolopyrimidine sulfonamides
would result in compounds such as triazolopyrimidines acylsulf-
onamide (3) that may maintain overall structural features required
to bind to the bacterial enzyme through the critical residues
(Fig. 2). The triazolopyrimidine acylsulfonamides 3 are also already
known in literature as herbicides or plant growth regulants.12,13
It is interesting to note here that the genesis of triazolopyrimi-
dine sulfonamides itself has its origin in the conformational
restriction of sulfonylureas (Fig. 3).9a Overlay of SMM (crystal
bound conformation as in 1YI0),9b triazolopyrimidine sulfonamide
(Flumetasulam) and triazolopyrimidine acylsulfonamide 3d is de-
picted in Fig.4.
As evident from the overlay, the common feature present in
both sulfonylureas and triazolopyrimidine sulfonamides is the
presence of SO2NH group. The carbonyl group of 3d occupies the
same region as that of carbonyl group present in SMM and allows
the pyrimidine part of triazolopyrimidine ring (3d) to come closer
to same position as that of pyrimidine ring of SMM.
To validate our hypothesis, we evaluated the binding mode of
SMM and compound 3d through docking using Mtb AHAS homol-
ogy model built over plant AHAS (1YI0) as a template. Docking
studies (Fig. 4) suggest that the binding mode and the observed
interactions of SMM and 3d were quite similar to sulfonylureas
class of compounds, reported in the crystal structure of plant and
yeast AHAS.9b,c The carbonyl of 3d and one of the nitrogen atom
of triazolopyrimidine ring forms crucial hydrogen bond (HB) inter-
actions with terminal nitrogen’s of conserved Arg377 mimicking
carbonyl and pyrimidine ring nitrogen of SMM. The sulfonyl
oxygen of 3d forms HB interaction with Lys197 whereas the
Figure 4. Comparison of Hypothetical binding modes of SMM (stick model, green)
and compound 3d (stick mode, yellow) in Mtb AHAS homology model (grey,
important residues are shown in stick model). Dash line indicates hydrogen bond
interactions.
triazolopyrimidine ring of 3d forms a very strong
p–p stacking
interaction with indolyl group of Trp516. Thus, the newly designed
triazolopyrimidine acylsulfonamide class of compounds may act as
novel Mtb AHAS inhibitors.
Coincidentally acylsulfonamides, such as 4 and 5, have been re-
ported to be inhibitors of plant AHAS14 thus giving credence to our
thinking that bioisosteric replacement of sulfonamide with acyl-
sulfonamides may be an valid strategy to identify new inhibitors
of Mtb AHAS (Fig. 5).
We have designed and synthesized differently substituted triaz-
olopyrimidine acylsulfonamide class of compounds with variations
in the phenyl sulfonamide part and tested. Here, we present AHAS
enzyme inhibition and MIC data for triazolopyrimidine acylsulf-
onamides in Table 1.
The title series of triazolopyrimidine acylsulfonamides were
synthesized in a convergent fashion by coupling sulfonamides 11
and triazolopyrimidine carboxylic acid 9 using EDCI as coupling re-
agent (Scheme1). 9 was obtained by condensing ethyl 5-amino-
4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxylate (6) with acetylacetone (7) as per
the literature procedure.12 The sulfonamides used were either
commercially available or were conveniently synthesized by
R1
CH3
N
O
O
S
H3C
N
N
H
N
R2
O
H
CH3
N
O
N
N
R1
Sulf onyl Urea (1)
O
S
CH3
HN
H3C
N
O
N
N
R2
(3)
NH
O
O
R2
H
N
O
N
Hybrid Molecule
Triazolopyrimidine acylsulfonamides
O
S
H3C
N
H
N
N
O
R1
S
N
H
S
Ar
O
Ar
O
O
O
Triazolopyrimidine sulfonamides (2)
Figure 2. Hybridization approach to get triazolopyrimidines acylsulfonamide.
4
5
Figure 5. Acylsulfonamides as AHAS inhibitors.