14
P. Morán-Poladura et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 696 (2011) 12e15
Scheme 3. IPrAuNTf2-catalyzed cyclization of N-(3-iodoprop-2-ynyl)-N-tosyl-1-naphthylamine derivative 1h.
The data in Table 1 clearly evidence a modulation of the nature
affords predominantly the cyclization product incorporating the
iodine migration in the structure of the major isomer.
of the reaction products by both, the ancillary ligand on the cata-
lytic system and the substituent onto the substrate that becomes
part of the metal systems upon coordination. Again, for a given
substrate 1, catalyst II gives always lower 2:3 ratios, favouring the
formation of the corresponding cyclization product 3 arising from
a 1,2-iodine shift (entries 1/2; 5/6 and 8/9). An additional experi-
ment was conducted to scrutinize the possibility of a major coun-
terion effect also operating [14]. Thus, 1b was also subjected to
reaction with the alternative catalytic system resulting from the
AgBF4 activation of the IPrAuCl complex. When 1b was exposed,
under argon atmosphere, to 3 mol% of this catalytic system, in DCE
at room temperature for 21 h, complete consumption of the start-
ing iodoalkyne and the formation of a 1:5 ratio of 2b:3b in 99%
overall yield was noticed (calculated by nmr using 1,3,5-trime-
thoxybenzene as inner reference). The outcome of this experiment
is in line with the previous result obtained using IPrAuNTf2 as
catalyst and suggests that for this transformation, the counterion is
not significantly affecting the observed product distribution.
On the other hand, the use of a substrate 1 having a more elec-
tron-rich arene speeds comparatively the direct cyclization leading
to 2, thus hampering the formation of product 3 derived from a pre-
organization of the system via 1,2-migration [15]. So, for instance,
using the catalyst II, the relative amount of compound 3 diminished
in going from simple phenyl to 4-methoxyphenyl, with an inter-
mediate figure for the tolyl derivative (see Scheme 2 and Table 1
entries 3 and 2, respectively). Significantly, this process is also
compatible with the presence of moderately deactivating groups
though, so far, the cyclization is inhibited when a strong-deacti-
vating nitro group is present. Regarding the selectivity, the presence
of electron-withdrawing groups should slow the direct cyclization
process, allowing for the iodine migration to occur. In fact, excellent
selectivity in favour of the formation of the corresponding product 3
was noticed in those cases (see entries 4, 6 and 9).
Further work devoted to improve the efficiency, scope and some
practical issues concerning the synthetic potential of the herein
sketched new transformation are in progress. Among them are
research efforts addressing solvent and temperature effects and
other factors that might affect the selectivity. Also further ligand
optimization studies and work aimed at the eventual imple-
mentation of this chemistry to prepare other hetero and carbo-
cycles in a related manner will be undertaken.
3. Conclusions
In short, initial exploratory studies and conceptual basis for
a
new protocol to access differently site-iodinated relevant
heterocyclic frames are reported. This product diversity is accessed
by judicious ligand tuning in gold (I)-catalyzed intramolecular
hydroarylation reactions involving simple tethered iodoalkynyl and
arene partners.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the MICINN/FEDER (Grant CTQ-2007-61048)
and the Principado de Asturias (Grant IB 08-088). S.S.-P. and M.P.
thank the Ministerio de Educación and the European Union (Fondo
Social Europeo) for a predoctoral fellowship. We thank the
reviewers for their useful suggestions.
Appendix. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
References
Moreover, for substrate 1b the reactivity of gold (I) catalysts
bearing some phosphine as ligand was also investigated. As a func-
tion of its electronic characteristics, this class of ligand is expected to
show behaviour in-between the phosphite and the NHC-type
ligands. Gratifyingly, in good agreement with this assumption, this
turns out to be the case. Thus, the use of PPh3 resulted in the
formation of a 1.2:1 ratio of 2b:3b in 81% overall yield, while it
switches to 1:1.7, global yield (calculated by nmr using 1,3,5-tri-
methoxybenzene as inner reference) of 97%, using di-tert-butyl(o-
biphenyl)phosphine [P(t-Bu)2(o-biphenyl), JOHNPHOS].
[1] Reviews on hydroarylation of alkynes: (a) C. Nevado, A.M. Echavarren,
Synthesis (2005) 167e182;
(b) M. Bandini, E. Emer, S. Tommasi, A. Umani-Ronchi, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
(2006) 3527e3544.
Selected later examples: (c) Y. Luo, Z. Li, C.-J. Li, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 2675e2678;
(d) M.Y. Yoon, J.H. Kim, D.S. Choi, U.S. Shin, J.Y. Lee, C.E. Song, Adv. Synth. Catal.
349 (2007) 1725e1737;
(e) N. Chernyak, V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 5636e5637;
(f) W. Huang, L. Hong, P. Zheng, R. Liu, X. Zhou, Tetrahedron 65 (2009)
3603e3610;
(g) S. Suárez-Pantiga, D. Palomas, E. Rubio, J.M. González, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 48 (2009) 7857e7861;
Finally, the reaction of a 2-naphthyl derivative was investigated
to check the consistency of the underlying regiocontrol noticed for
aniline derivatives, as well to test a plausible selectivity issue
concerning the ring becoming involved in the cyclization event. The
main findings are graphically summarized in Scheme 3.
In this case a more sluggish process occurs, likely due to confor-
mational constrains imposed by the interaction of the bulky tosyl
and naphthyl appendages onto nitrogen to enable the cyclization.
Nevertheless, simply increasing the reaction temperature resulted in
an efficient and selective transformation, with just cyclization at one
ring taking place and, interestingly, again the use of the IPr ligand
(h) K. Komeyama, R. Igawa, K. Takaki, Chem. Commun. (2010) 1748e1750.
[2] (a) L. Zhang, S.A. Kozmin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 10204e10205;
(b) T. Ishikawa, S. Manabe, T. Aikawa, T. Kudo, S. Saito, Org. Lett. 6 (2004)
2361e2364.
[3] For representative recent work on alkyne iodoarylation see, for instance: (a)
J. Barluenga, M. Trincado, M. Marco-Arias, A. Ballesteros, E. Rubio,
J.M. González, Chem. Commun. (2005) 2008e2010;
(b) S.A. Worlikar, T. Kesharwani, T. Yao, R.C. Larock, J. Org. Chem. 72 (2007)
1347e1353 and references therein.
For a related alkene and allene iodoarylation strategies, see respectively: (c)
J. Barluenga, M. Trincado, E. Rubio, J.M. González, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004)
3416e3417;
(d) J. Barluenga, E. Campos-Gómez, A. Minatti, D. Rodríguez, A. Ballesteros,
J.M. González, Chem. Eur. J 15 (2009) 8946e8950.