et al. reported a one-pot microwave-promoted synthesis of
cis-1-bromo-1-alkenes from anti-2,3-dibromo-3-arylalkanoic
acid followed by Suzuki-Miyaura coupling to afford cis-
stilbenes.8 Kuang et al. also reported a one-pot synthesis of
cis-1-bromo-1-alkenes from anti-2,3-dibromo-3-arylalkanoic
acid followed by Sonogashira coupling to afford the corre-
sponding enynes under microwave irradiation.9 Those one-
pot syntheses are highly efficient.
However, very little is known about the systematic
synthesis of 2-bromo-1-alkenes yet,10a-d although a few
sporadic examples exist of such syntheses.11 Herein, we
disclose a concise one-pot method for highly chemoselective
monobromination of allyl alcohol derivatives and sequential
Sonogashira coupling.
We anticipated that bromine addition to allyl alcohol
derivatives, followed by Ohgiya-Nishiyama’s method for
selective elimination,10 could be suitable for one-pot C2-
selective bromination of allyl alcohol derivatives. Therefore,
we started our investigations with 1-(allyloxy)-4-nitrobenzene
1a as a substrate, pyridinium bromide perbromide (Pyr·HBr3)
as a manageable brominating agent and 1,8-diazabicyclo-
[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) as a mild base (Table 1). In a
chloroform, concentrated in vacuo, and purified by silica gel
column chromatography. When 3.1 equiv of DBU was used,
the reaction gave the desired 2-bromo-1-alkene 2a together
with tiny amounts of regioisomers in a 99% overall yield
(entry 2). In contrast, when 2.2 equiv of DBU was used, the
reaction gave not only a small amount of 2a but also the
intermediate dibromoalkane as a major product (entry 1).
The solvent effect of acetonitrile on yield is comparable to
that of 1,2-dichloroethane, although the other solvents slow
down the rate of initial bromine addition (entries 2-6).
Significantly, when 1.1 equiv of potassium carbonate, rather
than pyridine, was added as a HBr scavenger before addition
of DBU, the requisite amounts of DBU were successfully
reduced (entries 7-9). Thus, we found that two optimal
conditions (entries 2 and 9) allowed efficient and versatile one-
pot synthesis of 2-bromo allyl alcohol derivatives 2 from allyl
alcohol derivatives 1 (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
.
One-Pot C2-Selective Bromination of Allyl Alcohol
Derivatives 1
Table 1. Optimization of One-Pot Selective Bromination
condition Ia
condition II
equiv of time ratiob (2-bromo/
To confirm the generality of the one-pot chemoselective
bromination reaction, we examined a variety of allyl alcohol
derivatives 1 using optimized Method A and/or B (Table
2). First, the allyl alcohols (2-propen-1-ol), which are
protected by substituted phenyl (2b-2f), benzyl (2g, 2h),
benzoyl (2i-2k), and silyl (2l) groups, were investigated
(entries 1-15). As explained by Nishiyama et al.,10 the
yields and regioselectivity of the DBU-promoted elimination
reaction seem to be controlled by the inductive electron-
withdrawing effects of O-functional groups at the neighbor-
ing position. However, compound 2g, which has an electron-
donating PMB group, was obtained in high yield and
selectivity (entry 7). Surprisingly, compound 2l, with an
electron-donating bulky triisopropylsilyl group, was also
obtained in moderate yield and satisfactory selectivity (entries
14 and 15). In general, Method B requires a longer time for
the elimination reaction than does Method A.
yield (%);
additive
(equiv)
entry
solvent
DBU
(h)
1-bromo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(CH2Cl)2
(CH2Cl)2
DMF
THF
CH3CN
toluene
2.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
1.1
2.2
1.1
48.0 6c; 45/1
0.2 99; 46/1
0.2 68d; 48/1
1.5 71e; 48/1
0.3 92; 45/1
0.4 64f; 30/1
7.5 0g
pyridine (1.0) (CH2Cl)2
pyridine (1.0) (CH2Cl)2
K2CO3 (1.0) (CH2Cl)2
3.0 88h; 37/1
1.0 91; 39/1
a The typical reaction times for bromination were between 12 and 14 h.
b Ratio of 2-bromoalkene and 1-bromoalkene was determined by 1H NMR.
c Dibromoalkane was obtained (58%). d 1a was recovered (22%). e 1a was
recovered (26%). f 1a was recovered (29%). g Dibromoalkane was obtained
(86%). h 1a was recovered (6%).
Next, we examined more complicated substrates. For
secondary alcohol derivatives 2m, 2p, and 2q, yields and
selectivities were excellent (entries 16, 17, and 21-24),
although tertiary alcohol derivative 2n was produced in only
general procedure, 1a and pyridinium bromide perbromide
(1.1 equiv) were stirred at room temperature for 12-14 h.
DBU was added to the reaction system at 0 °C, and the
system was heated to 60 °C. The reaction was quenched with
saturated aqueous NH4Cl or 1 M aqueous HCl, and the
reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane or
(10) For 2-bromo-1-alkenes synthesis, see: (a) Ohgiya, T.; Nishiyama,
S. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1084. (b) Ohgiya, T.; Nishiyama, S. Heterocycles
2004, 63, 2349. (c) Ohgiya, T.; Nishiyama, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
8273. (d) Ohgiya, T.; Nakamura, K.; Nishiyama, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
2005, 78, 1549. For reviews on the elimination reactions of 1,2-dibromoal-
kanes, see: (e) Ohgiya, T.; Kutsumura, N.; Nishiyama, S. J. Synth. Org.
Chem. Jpn. 2008, 66, 139. (f) Ohgiya, T.; Kutsumura, N.; Nishiyama, S.
Synlett 2008, 3091.
(8) Bazin, M.-A.; Jouanne, M.; El-Kashef, H.; Rault, S. Synlett 2009,
2789.
(9) Kuang, C.; Yang, Q.; Senboku, H.; Tokuda, M. Tetrahedron 2005,
61, 4043.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 15, 2010
3317