Scheme 4. Photooxidation of 2-(R,β-Dihydroxyalkyl)furans:
One-Pot Synthesis of 6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-3-en-2-ones
Scheme 5. Synthesis of 2-Hydroxy-exo-brevicomin
behaves similarly to furanol 1m. In other words, the
extra hydroxyl at the β-position of the side chain
does not have significant effect on the distribution of
the final products.
The synthetic potential of this new methodology was
demonstrated by a rapid and enantioselective synthesis
of 2-hydroxy-exo-brevicomin20 (14, Scheme 5). With
compound 13a already in hand, the synthesis of the
natural product was completed by diasterospecific re-
duction using NaBH4, followed by double bond hydro-
genation. The spectroscopic data of synthetic hydroxy-
exo-brevicomin were in full agreement with those of the
natural product.20d,h,i
a Relative ratios were determined by 1H NMR of the crude photo-
oxidation mixture. b Isolated yield.
The procedures developed herein, in which oxygen from
the air is excited to transiently generate singlet oxygen in
situ, are green, clean, and highly atom economic.21 Many
standard laboratory oxidants used to attain similar results,
employ toxic heavy metals, or are reagents that require their
own laborious synthesis. In contrast, when using singlet oxy-
gen there is no waste either in terms of its generation, or in its
application (wherein both oxygen atoms are transferred and
incorporated into the oxidation substrate).
For all these reasons, using singlet oxygen to access
the sought after 6-hydroxy-3(2H)-pyranone unit from
2-(R-hydroxyalkyl)furans is particularly attractive from a
synthetic standpoint. The original concept has also been
neatly extended to show how readily and effectively a
2-(R,β-dihydroxyalkyl)furan can yield the 6,8-dioxabi-
cyclo[3.2.1]oct-3-en-2-one framework from a one-pot sing-
let oxygen initiated reaction sequence.
by Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation (SAD)16 of the
resulting olefins. Wittig coupling ofthe phosphonium ylide
10b gave almost exclusively the trans-olefin and, as ex-
pected, the following SAD reaction afforded the threo-1,2-
diol 11b. Wittig coupling of the phosphonium ylides 10a
and 10c resulted into the formation of cis/trans mixtures of
geometrical isomers (1.3:1 in case of 10a, and 1.5:1 in case
of 10c). SAD reactions of these two mixtures of geome-
trical isomers resulted in the unexpected predominat for-
mation of the threo-1,2-diols 11a and 11c. Similar results
have been recently reported17 and were attributed to a
cis-trans isomerization, occurring during the reaction
itself, combined with the known faster dihydroxylation
of a trans double bond when compared with its cis isomer.
Furandiols 11a-c were subjected to the previously
described 1O2 photooxidation and reduction conditions.
In situ treatment with catalytic amount of p-TsOH
afforded the desired 6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-3-en-2-
ones 13a-c in good overall isolated yield (Scheme 4).
Several different classes of natural products including
the pteriatoxins and pinnatoxins18 and the didemnise-
rinolipids19 contain such a motif.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to Dr. Tamsyn Mon-
tagnon (University of Crete) for valuable discussions and
comments. This research was supported by COST action
CM0804.
Supporting Information Available. Experimental proce-
dures, full spectroscopic data, and copies of 1H and 13
The product distribution for the substrates 11a and
11c is similar to substrate 1f, while furandiol 11b
C
NMR spectra for all new compounds. This material is
(16) For a review, see: Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless,
K. B. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483.
(17) Vassilikogiannakis, G; Alexopoulou, I.; Tofi, M.; Montagnon,
€
(20) (a) Francke, W.; Schroder, F.; Philipp, P.; Meyer, H.; Sinnwell,
T. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 259.
V.; Gries, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996, 4, 363. (b) Francke, W.;
Schroder, F. Curr. Org. Chem. 1999, 3, 407. (c) Francke, W.; Kitching,
€
(18) For a review of the original isolation work, see: (a) Kita, M.;
Uemura, D. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 454. For total synthesis, see:
(b) McCauley, J. A.; Nagasawa, K.; Lander, P. A.; Mischke, S. G.;
Semones, M. A.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7647. (c)
Sakamoto, S.; Sakazaki, H.; Hagiwara, K.; Kamada, K.; Ishii, K.;
Noda, T.; Inoue, M.; Hirama, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
6505. (d) Stivala, C. E.; Zakarian, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3774.
(e) Nakamura, S.; Kikuchi, F.; Hashimoto, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 7091.
W. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 233. (d) Takikawa, H.; Shimbo, K.-I.;
Mori, K. Liebigs Ann. Recueil 1997, 821. (e) Kumar, D. N.; Rao, B. V.;
Ramanjaneyulu, G. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1611. (f)
Gautam, D.; Kumar, D. N.; Rao, B. V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2006, 17, 819. (g) Prasad, K. R.; Anbarasan, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2006, 17, 850. (h) Prasad, K. R.; Anbarasan, P. Synlett 2006, 2087. (i)
Cheng, B.; Liebeskind, L. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3682.
(21) For recent reviews, see: (a) Gaich, T.; Baran, P. S. J. Org. Chem.
2010, 75, 4657. (b) Newhouse, T.; Baran, P. S.; Hoffmann, R. W. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3010.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(19) Gonzalez, N.; Rodrı
´
guez, J.; Jimenez, C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
5705.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011
1169