A. Seridi et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 14 (2011) 238–242
241
2
a Gaussian function y=ce−bx with the height (c) equal to the oscillator
the neutrality and the lipophilic character of both metallic complexes are
two important prerequisites for the design of central nervous system
(CNS) receptor-binding agents. The binding affinity and in vivo
biodistributions of 2-99mTc will be reported in another paper.
strength and b equal to 0.04 nm−2. The TDDFT/PCM calculations well
reproduce the absorption spectrum of 2-Re in methanol. The assign-
ment of the calculated orbital excitations to the experimental bands was
based on an overview of the contour plots and relative energy to the
occupied and unoccupied orbitals involved in the electronic transitions.
The longest wavelength experimental band of the rhenium complex at
329.9 nm originates in the HOMO-1→LUMO, HOMO-1→LUMO+1
and HOMO-4→LUMO transitions. As shown in Fig. 2, the LUMO and
LUMO+1 orbitals are centered at the 2-pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole part of
the chelate ligand, the HOMO-1 orbital has a substantial contribution
from the free electron pairs on the nitrogen atoms of the piperazine ring,
whereas the HOMO-4 is delocalized on the whole Re(CO)3Cl unit.
Accordingly, the transitions assigned to the longest wavelength
Acknowledgements
The Gaussian-03 calculations were carried out in the Wrocław
Centre for Networking and Supercomputing, WCSS, Wrocław, Poland,
Appendix A. Supplementary material
⁎
See the supplementary data for the materials and equipment, the
synthesis of compounds 2 and 2-Re and Table 1. CCDC 787115 and
CCDC 787116 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this
paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the
can be found online at doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2010.11.002.
experimental bands can be seen as mixed dRe→π (chelate) (MLCT)
⁎
and π(Cl)/π(chelate)→π (chelate) (LLCT) or a delocalized MLLCT
(metal–ligand–ligand CT) description can be used.
The experimental absorption bands at 276.8, 241.1 and 206.1 nm
are attributed to the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (occurring from
the rhenium ion to the π-antibonding orbitals of the chelate ligand or
π-antibonding orbitals of the carbonyl groups), ligand–ligand charge
transfer and intraligand (IL) transitions (see Table 1 in supplementary
data). As expected, 2-Re exhibited fluorescence at room temperature
in the MeOH solution (λexc =330 nm, and λem =522 nm) [26]. Its
observed that the quantum yield (Φ=0.32%) is in agreement with the
values measured for other Re(I) complexes of the type [Re(α,α′
diimine)(CO)3X] (α,α′-diimine=2,2′-bipy or pyta, X=halogene) [7].
The technetium-99m being one of the most relevant isotopes for
imaging purposes, the 99mTc-labelling of 2 was evaluated. The
radiocomplex 2-99mTc was prepared in excellent yield (N95%) using
the fac-[99mTc(CO)3(H2O)3]+ precursor (see supplementary data).
After 20°min at 80°C, [99mTc(CO)3(H2O)3]+ had disappeared completely
and the formation of a new product, 2-99mTc, was observed in the
radiochromatogram. Its radiochemical purity assessed by ITLCwasN98%
after RP-HPLC purification. In addition, we demonstrated that the
radiolabelling of 2 could be performed at room temperature but it
required a longer reaction time. The chemical identity of 2-99mTc was
determined by comparing its analytical HPLC profile with the HPLC
profile of the rhenium analog 2. Since the retention time of the
99mTc-complex is similar to that of the “cold” Re-complex (11.9°min for
2-Re vs. 11.3°min for 2-99mTc), it may be assumed that identical
structures are adopted by the species generated at the tracer level and
the complex produced and characterized on the macroscopic scale. As
previously reported by several teams, the chlorine atom present in the
radiolabelling medium replaces one of the H2O ligands of the [99mTc
(CO)3(H2O)3]+ precursor (thermodynamically favoured process)
[16,27], leading after reaction with 2, to the formation of the neutral
complex 2-99mTc of general formula [99mTc(CO)3Cl( 2-2)].
References
[1] (a) R. Schibli, R. Schwarzbach, R. Alberto, K. Otner, H. Schmalle, C. Dumas, A. Egli,
P.A. Schubiger, Bioconjug. Chem. 13 (2002) 750;
(b) R. Alberto, K. Otner, N. Weathley, R. Schibli, P.A. Schubiger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
123 (2001) 3135.
[2] (a) K.A. Stephenson, S.R. Banerjee, T. Besanger, O.O. Sogbein, M.K. Levadala, N.
McFarlane, J.A. Lemon, D.R. Boreham, K.P. Maresca, J.D. Brennan, J.W. Babich,
J. Zubieta, J.F. Valliant, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 8598;
(b) P. Schaffer, J.A. Gleave, J.A. Lemon, L.C. Reid, L.K.K. Pacey, T.H. Farncombe, D.R.
Boreham, J. Zubieta, J.W. Babich, L.C. Doering, J.F. Valliant, Nucl. Med. Biol. 35
(2008) 159.
[3] A. Coleman, C. Brennan, J.G. Vos, M.T. Pryce, Coord. Chem. Rev. 252 (2008) 2585.
[4] (a) S.R. Banerjee, J.W. Babich, J. Zubieta, Chem. Commun. (2005) 1784;
(b) S.R. Banerjee, P. Schaffer, J.W. Babich, J.F. Valliant, J. Zubieta, Dalton Trans.
(2005) 3886.
[5] (a) A. Boulay, Master's thesis, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France,
2009b A. Boulay, C. Picard, E. Benoist, in: U. Mazzi, W.C. Eckelman, W.A. Volkert
(Eds.), Technetium and other radiometals in chemistry and medicine, SGE
Editoriali, Padova, Italy, 2010, pp. 111–112.
[6] B. Happ, C. Friebe, A. Winter, M.D. Hager, R. Hoogenboom, U.S. Schubert, Chem.
Asian J. 4 (2009) 154.
[7] M. Obata, A. Kitamura, A. Mori, C. Kameyama, J.A. Czaplewska, R. Tanaka, I.
Kinoshita, T. Kusumoto, H. Hashimoto, M. Harada, Y. Mikata, T. Funabiki, S. Yano,
Dalton Trans. (2008) 3292.
[8] (a) J. Passchier, A. van Waerde, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 28 (2001) 113;
(b) I. Heimbold, A. Drews, R. Syhre, M. Kretzschmar, H.-J. Pietzsch, B. Johannsen,
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 29 (2002) 82;
(c) M. Saidi, S. Seifert, M. Kretzschmar, R. Bergmann, H.-J. Pietzsch, J. Organomet.
Chem. 689 (2004) 4739;
(d) R. Garcia, L. Gano, L. Maria, A. Paulo, I. Santos, H. Spies, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 11
(2006) 769;
(e) J.S.D. Kumar, J. Prabhakaran, V.J. Majo, M.S. Milak, S.-C. Hsiung, H. Tamir, N.R.
Simpson, R.L. Van Heertum, J.J. Mann, R.V. Parsey, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol.
Imaging 34 (2007) 1050;
(f) N. Aznavour, C. Benkelfat, P. Gravel, A. Aliaga, P. Rosa-Neto, B. Bedell, L.
Zimmer, L. Descarries, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 36 (2009) 53;
(g) C. Bolzati, N. Salvarese, D. Carta, F. Refosco, A. Dolmella, H.-J. Pietzsch, R.
Bergmann, G. Bandoli, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. (2010), doi:10.1007/s00775-010-
0712-48 and references therein.
The lipophilic character of this radiocomplex was assessed by the
determination of the partition coefficient (P) in physiological
conditions (0.1°M phosphate buffer pH 7.4/n-octanol) and was
expressed as logPo/w. A value of 2.34 was found, indicating that
2-99mTc is moderately lipophilic. It is noteworthy that this value is
within the range for related radiocomplexes able to cross the blood
brain barrier (logPo/w =0.5–2.5) [28].
[9] G. Campiani, S. Butini, F. Trotta, C. Fattorusso, B. Catalanotti, F. Aiello, S. Gemma, V.
Nacci, E. Novellino, J.A. Stark, A. Cagnotto, E. Fumagalli, F. Carnovali, L. Cervo, T.
Mennini, J. Med. Chem. 46 (2003) 3822.
In short, a novel pyta derivative grafted to a bioactive pharmacophore
was prepared, taking advantage of the trendy click chemistry. The
corresponding rhenium and technetium complexes were characterized
in the solid and solution states. If a Tc- or Re-tricarbonyl complex with a
tridentate ligand is less prone to cross-metallation, previous studies
showed that this kind of bidentate M(CO)+3 complexes with a chlorine
ligand (at the sixth position) was suitable for in vivo work and exhibited
high stability against histidine and cysteine challenge experiments [27a].
Thus, this bidentate ligand 2 can be considered: (i) a good starting point
for the preparation of novel technetium-99m 5HT1A imaging probes and
(ii) an alternative of 5HT1A imaging probes based on PET emitters. Then,
[10] C. Camp, S. Dorbes, C. Picard, E. Benoist, Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 1979.
[11] See supplementary data for the synthesis and the characterization of compounds
2 and 2-Re.
[12] Crystal data for 2.H2O: C20H26N6O2, monoclinic, space group P21/c, a=13.1340
(3), b=14.5355(3), c=10.1669(2) Å, α=γ=90° β=96.9350(10)° V=1926.75
(7) Å3, Z=4, Dc=1.318 Mg.m-3, 24351 reflections collected, 4753 unique,
Rint=0.0401, data/restraints/parameters: 4753/0/260; S=1.046; Final R indices
[I N2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0401, wR2 = 0.0935;
R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0554,
wR2=0.1020, Largest diff. peak and hole 0.251 and −0.174 e.Å-3, CCDC 787115.
[13] (a) J.D. Crowley, P.H. Bandeen, Dalton Trans. (2010) 612;
(b) D. Schweinfurth, R. Pattacini, S. Strobel, B. Sarkar, Dalton Trans. (2009) 9291.
[14] O. Karagiorgou, G. Patsis, M. Pelecanou, C.P. Raptopoulou, A. Terzis, T. Siatra-
Papastaikoudi, R. Alberto, I. Permettis, M. Papadopoulos, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005)
4118.