COMMUNICATIONS
[3] a) M. J. OꢂDonnell, W. D. Bennett, S. Wu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2353–2355; b) S. E. Denmark,
Heterocycles 2010, 82, 1527.
[4] a) A. Nelson, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1685–1687;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1583–1585; b) K.
Maruoka, Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 679–697; c) B.
Lygo, B. I. Andrews, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 518–
525; d) K. Maruoka, T. Ooi, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
3013–3028.
enantioselectivities were obtained, and recovery and
reuse of the catalyst were attained without significant
reduction of activity while maintaining high enantio-
selectivity. Further applications of this catalyst to
other asymmetric reactions and continuous-flow syn-
thesis are ongoing.
Experimental Section
[5] Y. Arakawa, N. Haraguchi, S. Itsuno, Angew. Chem.
2008, 120, 8356–8359; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
8232–8235.
General Procedure for Reaction using 10 to Afford
(S)-tert-Butyl 2-[(Diarylmethylidene)amino]-5-oxo-
alkanoates (14)
[6] a) S. S. Jew, H. G. Park, Chem. Commun 2009, 7090–
7103; b) B. Lygo, B. Allbutt, E. H. M. Kirton, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2005, 46, 4461–4464; c) B. Lygo, B. I. An-
drews, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 518–525; d) B. Lygo,
C. Beynon, C. Lumley, M. C. McLeod, C. E. Wade, Tet-
rahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3363–3365; e) B. Lygo, C.
Beynon, M. C. McLeod, C.-E. Roy, C. E. Wade, Tetra-
hedron 2010, 66, 8832–8836.
[7] a) D. Wannaporn, T. Ishikawa, Mol. Divers. 2005, 9,
321–331; b) T. Ishikawa, T. Heima, M. Yoshida, T. Ku-
mamoto, Helv. Chim. Acta 2014, 97, 307–314.
[8] A. E. Sheshenev, E. V. Boltukhina, A. J. P. White, K. K.
Hii, Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 7126–7129; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 6988–6991.
Schiff base 11 (15.0 mg, 0.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), 10 (51 mg,
2.5 mmol, 5 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (32 mg, 0.08 mmol,
1.5 equiv.) were placed in a two-neck flask. Anhydrous o-
xylene (0.5 mL) was added and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 10 min, then at 08C for an-
other 10 min, followed by addition of a,b-unsaturated
ketone 12 (0.10 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) in one portion. The mix-
ture was stirred (1000 rpm) at 08C and the progress of the
reaction was monitored by TLC. Upon complete consump-
tion of 11, the reaction mixture was directly filtered and
washed with toluene. After evaporation under vacuum, the
residue was loaded on a silica gel column and eluted with
hexane/ethyl acetate (95:5) to afford the desired product;
yield: 18.2 mg (0.043 mmol, 86%).
[9] Polystyrene polymer tends to swell in aromatic solvents
such as toluene, xylene and mesitylene, making the cat-
alyst more sticky.
[10] T. Kitao, S. Bracco, A. Comotti, P. Sozzani, M. Naito, S.
Seki, T. Uemura, S. Kitagawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015,
137, 5231–5238.
Reuse of 10
After filtration, the solid resin was washed with dichlorome-
thane and brine (1:1 v/v, 4 mL) for 5 h with stirring at room
temperature. After filtration and washing with H2O (20 mL)
and then acetone (20 mL), the catalyst was dried under
vacuum for 12 h and directly used in the next reaction.
[11] K. Brak, E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 558–
588; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 534–561.
[12] Polymer immobilized catalyst 9’ without the tetraethy-
lene glycol linker was also prepared. The catalytic ac-
tivity of 9’ was lower than that of 10 (under the same
reaction conditions as Table 1, entry 5, 9’: 68% yield for
6 h vs. 10: 88% yield for 1.5 h), whereas the ee was
comparable (87% vs. 88%).
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Sci-
entific Research from theJapan Society for the Promotion of
Science (JSPS) and the Japan Science and Technology
Agency (JST).
References
[1] a) P. T. Anastas, M. M. Kirchhoff, Acc. Chem. Res.
2002, 35, 686–694; b) R. Cernansky, Nature 2015, 519,
379–380.
[13] M.-Q. Hua, L. Wang, H.-F. Cui, J. Nie, X.-L. Zhang, J.-
[2] B. List, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5413–5415.
A. Ma, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1631–1633.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 0000, 000, 0 – 0
4
ꢁ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!