arrangement of the donor and acceptor blocks in the
conjugated chain. However, combining donor and accep-
tor blocks with multiple possible variations poses the
question what are the structural limits of this approach.
Whereas an extended push-pull molecule with D and A
groups connected by a conjugating linker represents one
limiting case, the other limit would involve a system in
which D and A groups alternate on every carbon of the
conjugated chain. Taking polythiophene as a model, the
realization of this maximum possible D-A alternation
imposes that the D and A groups must be introduced on
the same thiophene unit. In this context, 3-alkoxy-4-cya-
nothiophenes 1 represent interesting building blocks since
both substituents combine strong donor or acceptor
strength with low steric demand (Figure 1).7
Scheme 1. Synthetic Pathway for the Synthesis of 1
diazomethane12 or with an ethoxycarbonylmethoxy group
by a Mitsunobu reaction,13 no simple and efficient general
method has been reported so far.
Figure 1. Limit structures in D-A approach.
We have recently described the synthesis of 3-methoxy-
4-cyanothiophene in two steps from 3,4-dibromothio-
phene.8 After substitution of the first bromo atom by the
methoxy group, the introduction of the cyano group was
performed with an excess of cyanide anion under micro-
wave irradiation. However, extension of this method to
longer alkoxy chains was limited by the difficulty in
synthesizing the intermediate 3-alkoxy-4-bromothiophene
derivatives.9 As a further step, we report here a new rapid
and efficient synthetic approach for the preparation
of 3-alkoxy-4-cyanothiophene derivatives 1 based on O-
alkylation of the readily accessible 4-cyano-3-oxotetrahy-
drothiophene 210 followed by oxidative aromatization
(Scheme 1).
The main difficulty resides in the selective O-alkylation
reaction of the enolate anion A for obtaining dihydrothio-
phene derivatives 3 in good yields. Baraldi et al. mainly
obtained C-alkylated derivatives 4 by treatment of 1 in dry
acetone with alkyl halides in the presence of anhydrous
potassium carbonate while the O-alkylated product was
formed only in 5-10% yield.11 Although O-alkylation of 2
by a methoxy group has been achieved by reaction with
The orientation to O-alkylation largely depends on the
nature of the base and of the alkylating agent used for the
nucleophilic substitution. The various conditions used for
the synthesis of compounds 3 are gathered in Table 1.
As expected, the use of methyl iodide in the presence of
K2CO3 as base gives 3a in a very low yield (entry 1). The
reactivity of the enolate anion can be improved to reach
yields of ca. 35% by the addition of crown ether to the
reactionmedium (entry 2) or inthe presence of a softcation
such as Csþ (entry 3).
The use of a stronger alkylating agent such as trifluor-
omethanesulfonate increases the yield of 3a up to 55%. With
a long-chain haloalkane in the presence of Cs2CO3 as a base,
the reaction proceeds in a moderate yield of 40-45% for
compound 3b after 2 h at room temperature or 15 min at
80 °C but the yield decreases to 22% for the compounds
containing branched alkyl chains (3c) (entries 4-7).
Application of microwave irradiation for enhancing
nucleophilic substitutions has been demonstrated,14 and
herein we have examined if this method could increase the
yield of O-alkylated compounds 3b and 3c.
Reactions were carried out by mixing compound 2 and an
alkylating agent in DMF in the presence of Cs2CO3 as the
base, and then the mixture was irradiated in an open vessel in a
CME microwave oven. TLC showed the complete consump-
tion of 2after 2 min of irradiation. With hexyl iodide (entry 8),
compound 3c was isolated in 53% yield while a small amount
(<10%) of C-alkylated compound 4c was also formed. A
large increase of the O-alkylation yield was observed when a
mesylate derivative was used as an alkylating agent. Thus,
(7) (a) Demanze, F.; Yassar, A.; Garnier, F. Adv. Mater. 1995, 7, 907.
(b) Ho, H. A.; Brisset, H.; Elandaloussi, E.; Frere, P.; Roncali, J. Adv.
Mater. 1996, 8, 990. (c) Berson, S.; Cecioni, S.; Billon, M.; Kervella, Y.;
de Bettignies, R.; Bailly, S.; Guillerez, S. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells
2010, 94, 699.
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢁ
(8) Hergue, N.; Mallet, C.; Frere, P.; Allain, M.; Roncali, J. Macro-
molecules 2009, 42, 5593.
(9) Savitha, G.; Hergue, N.; Guilmet, E.; Allain, M.; Frere, P.
ꢀ
ꢁ
Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1288.
(10) Compound 2 is easily prepared by condensation of acrylonitrile
on methylthioglycolate; see ref 11.
(11) Baraldi, P. G.; Pollini, G. P.; Zanirato, V. Synthesis 1985, 969.
(12) Chou, T.-S.; Chang, C.-Y.; Wu, M.-C.; Hung, S.-H.; Liu, H.-M.;
Yeh, W.-Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1643.
(13) Redman, A. M.; Dumas, J.; Scott, W. J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2061.
(14) Ju, Y.; Kumar, D.; Varma, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6697.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1763