knowledge, direct measurement of the second-order rate
constant associated with the nucleophilic opening of an
aziridinium ion has not yet been reported.6 On the other
hand, our involvement in the chemistry of strained azetidi-
nium 2,7 i.e. the higher homologues of aziridinium ions, has
led us to note that these species are much less electrophilic
than 1, which can be at first explained by a lower ring strain
in the four-membered ring (Figure 1). Here again, no direct
rate measurement of the nucleophilic opening of azetidi-
nium ions has so far been published. Aiming at a better
understanding of the electrophilic character of these highly
relevant building blocks for the synthesis of nitrogen-
containing molecules, we report herein the kinetics measure-
ments of their opening with neutral nucleophiles. This
allows for the first time a direct comparison of the reactivity
of these strained heterocycles and an estimation of their
electrophilicity.
react regioselectively at the unsubstituted carbon atom,3d,7e
these salts are perfect candidates for comparative nucleo-
philic openings, since their only difference lies in the size of
the heterocycle. However, in order to compare the kinetics
for both substrates, we had to find the proper nucleophile
fulfilling the following requirements: (i) measurable rates for
both substrates (i.e., not too fast for the aziridinium
substrate); (ii) the nucleophile or product should display a
specific UV-vis absorption in order to be able to accurately
follow the reaction; and (iii) the nucleophile should react
irreversibly. We initially studied the nucleophilic opening
with anionic nucleophiles, such as thiophenoxides, phen-
oxides, and benzoates, but in the case of 5 reaction rates
were too fast and could not be accurately measured by
stopped-flow techniques. We therefore shifted to neutral
nucleophiles and found that 4-dimethylaminopyridine
(DMAP) reacted with both substrates at measurable rates
in acetonitrile9 to produce pyridinium trifluoromethanesul-
fonates 9 and 10 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Nucleophilic Opening of 5 and 8 with DMAP
Figure 1. Aziridinium 1 and azetidinium 2 ions.
Aziridinium and azetidinium trifluoromethane sulfo-
nates 5 and 8 were prepared as depicted in Scheme 1. These
salts could be conveniently isolated after reaction of the
corresponding amines 4 and 7 with methyltrifluorometha-
nesulfonate and were stable enough to be stored without
appreciable degradation for weeks.
Furthermore, presence of a specific UV absorption band
in these compounds allowed accurate measurement of
their concentration. These pyridinium salts were isolated
in good yields, and no detectable byproducts were formed,
except in the case of aziridinium 5, for which the crude
reaction mixture showed a small amount (<5%) of a
regioisomer. Since pyridinium ion is a potential nucleo-
fuge, we heated both subtrates in refluxing acetonitrile for
a week, but without a significant change or detectable
production of the more substituted regioisomer. This is a
good indication for the irreversibility of the reaction,
because a similar experiment conducted with a chloride
atom as a leaving group led to complete isomerization
through thermodynamic control in the case of azetidinium
ions.10 The kinetics of nucleophilic opening with aziridi-
nium 5 was followed by UV spectrophotometry: equal
amounts of DMAP and 5 in acetonitrile were mixed in the
quartz cell, and the increase of absorbance of the produced
pyridinium 9 was followed against time at a given
temperature. Figure 2 shows an example of such data. After
integration of the kinetics rate law, a plot of (1/C0 - x) -
(1/C0), whereC0 denotes the initial concentration of DMAP
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Azetidinium and Aziridinium Triflates
In both cases, they were produced as single diastereoi-
somers, which is due to the preferred disposition of the
reacting lone pair, for steric reasons.8 Considering that alkyl
substituted aziridinium and azetidinium ions are known to
(6) Numerous kinetics data on the reaction rates of nitrogen mus-
tards, precursor of the electrophilic aziridinium with different nucleo-
philes, have been published. See inter alia: (a) Yang, H. Bull. Soc. Chim.
Belg. 1996, 105, 23. (b) Cullis, P. M.; Green, R. E.; Malone, M. E. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 7, 1503. (c) Kundu, G. C.; Shullek,
J. R.; Wilson, I. B. Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 1994, 49, 621. (d)
Hovinen, J.; Petterson-Fernholm, T.; Lahti, M.; Vilpo, J. Chem. Res.
Toxicol. 1998, 11, 1377.
(7) (a) Couty, F.; Kletskii, M. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 908, 3368. (b)
Drouillat, B.; Couty, F.; David, O.; Evano, G.; Marrot, J. Synlett 2008,
9, 1345. (c) Couty, F.; David, O.; Drouillat, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 9180. (d) Couty, F.; David, O.; Durrat, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
1027. (e) Couty, F.; David, O.; Durrat, F.; Evano, G.; Lakhdar, S.;
Marrot, J.; Vargas-Sanchez, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 3, 479.
(8) (a) For azetidiniums: Couty, F.; Durrat, F.; Evano, G.; Marrot, J.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4214. (b) For aziridiniums: Vedejs, E.; Kendall,
J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6941.
(9) Initial experiments were conducted in DCM, but reaction of the
solvent with DMAP led to erratic results; see: Rudine, A. B.; Walter,
M. G.; Wamser, C. C. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4292.
(10) Sivaprakasham, M.; Couty, F.; Evano, G.; Srinivas, B.; Sridhar,
R.; Rama Rao, K. Arkivoc 2007, (x), 71.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1837