straightforward synthesis of R-amino stannanes from sim-
ple imines4d,8 or an equivalent, such as an R-amino sulfone9
or an R-acetoxy amine,4a have all employed strongly
nucleophilic organometallic species such as LiSnBu3,
Et2ZnLiSnBu3, ClMgSnBu3, RZnSnBu3, and Bu3Sn-
LiCuCN (Scheme 2). These methods lack functional
group tolerability and often need a low reaction
temperature.
synthetically more useful N-Boc-R-amido sulfones could
not be stannylated even when using several potential
organometallic stannides that contained lithium, zinc, or
magnesium as the countercation. Also, the stannylation
would proceed through a radical mechanism, which re-
quired at least 2 equiv of alkali metal stannide. Hence, we
have circumvented these problems by using the reagent
combination of TMSSnBu3 and CsF12 and disclose, here-
in, the first mild and general stannylation of N-Boc- and
N-Cbz-R-amido sulfones.
First, different solvents for the stannylation of N-Boc-R-
amido sulfone 1a were investigated in the presence of
TMSSnBu3 (1.1 equiv) and CsF (3 equiv) at 60 °C (Table
1). When the reaction was performed in THF, the desired
R-amido stannane 2a was obtained exclusively in 96%
yield (entry 1). The use of 1,4-dioxane decreased the yield
(67%) and unidentified products were generated (entry 2).
When CH3CN, DMSO, and DMF (entries 3À5) were
used, the protiodestannylation product 3a was produced
as a byproduct.7
Scheme 2. Synthetic Strategy of R-Amino Stannanes
Table 1. Solvent Screening
During the course of our study on R-amino acid synth-
esis from N-Boc-R-amido sulfone and CO2,7 the combined
use of CsF and TMSSnBu3,10 both commercially available
and stable chemicals, was found to be very effective for the
preparation of N-Boc-R-amido stannanes from the corre-
sponding N-Boc-R-amido sulfones, where the tributylstan-
nyl anion was being generated in situ.10 Moreover, N-Boc-
R-amido sulfones can be readily prepared in stable crystal-
line form from the corresponding aldehydes and sodium
sulfinate according to Engberts’ method.11 A precedented
example of the stannylation of N-Cbz-R-amido sulfones,
reported by Pearson and co-workers,9b showed that the
substrate scope was not satisfactory and that the
yield (%)a
entry
solvent
THF
time (h)
2a
3a
1
2
3
4
5
2
96
67
58
24
58
<1
<1
27
47
22
1,4-dioxane
CH3CN
DMSO
2
0.5
0.5
1
DMF
a Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis using 1,1,2,2-tetra-
chloroethane as an internal standard.
(4) (a) Nativi, C.; Ricci, A.; Taddei, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
2637. (b) Ye, J.; Bhatt, R. K.; Falck, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1.
(c) Falck, J. R.; Bhatt, R. K.; Ye, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5973.
(d) Kells, K. W.; Chong, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15666.
(5) Jensen, M. S.; Yang, C.; Hsiao, Y.; Rivera, N.; Wells, K. M.;
Chung, J. Y. L.; Yasuda, N.; Hughes, D. L.; Reider, P. J. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 1081.
Having decided the optimal solvent for suppressing the
generation of protiodestannylation product 3a, various R-
amido sulfones were subjected to this stannylation (Figure 1).
All R-amido stannanes 2aÀ2r were purified by column
chromatography using 10% K2CO3/silica gel as a station-
ary phase to remove organotin impurities following Har-
rowven’s novel method reported recently.13 Substrates
(1aÀ1g) possessing electron-donating and -withdrawing
groups on an aromatic ring were all tolerated regardless of
the location of the groups on the ring, with not only N-Boc-
amido sulfone 1a but also N-Cbz-amido sulfone 1b being
effectively stannylated. It is noteworthy that cyano and ester
(6) Vedejs, E.; Haight, A. R.; Moss, W. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 6556.
(7) Mita, T.; Chen, J.; Sugawara, M.; Sato, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 1393. We also disclosed herein one-pot synthesis of R-amino
acids from R-amino sulfones using CsF and TMSSnBu3.
(8) (a) Kells, K. W.; Chong, J. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4215. (b) He, A.;
Falck, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6586.
(9) (a) MacLeod, D.; Quayle, P.; Davies, G. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 4927. (b) Pearson, W. H.; Lindbeck, A. C.; Kampf, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2622.
(10) For its application to organic synthesis, see: (a) Mori, M.;
Kaneta, N.; Isono, N.; Shibasaki, M. Tertahedron Lett. 1991, 43,
6139. (b) Mori, M.; Isono, N.; Kaneta, N.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 2972. (c) Honda, T.; Mori, M. Chem. Lett. 1994, 1013. (d)
Kinoshita, A.; Mori, M. Chem. Lett. 1994, 1475. (e) Imai, A. E.; Sato, Y.;
Nishida, M.; Mori, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1217.
(11) (a) Engberts, J. B. F. N.; Strating, J. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
1965, 84, 942. (b) Kanazawa, A. M.; Denis, J.-N.; Greene, A. E. J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 1238. (c) Mecozzi, T.; Petrini, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
8970.
(12) TMSSnBu3 reacted with an aldehyde in the presence of
CsFÀCsOH. See: Busch-Petersen, J.; Bo, Y.; Corey, E. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 2065.
(13) 10% K2CO3/silica gel was employed as a stationary phase
on column chromatography to remove organotin residues. See:
Harrowven, D. C.; Curran, D. P.; Kostiuk, S. L.; Wallis-Guy, I. L.;
Whiting, S.; Stenning, K. J.; Tang, B.; Packard, E.; Nanson, L. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 6335.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 9, 2011
2355