PRACTICAL SYNTHETIC PROCEDURES
Reduction of Ethanethiol Esters to Aldehydes
1123
dissolved in EtOAc (50 mL) and transferred to a 300 mL separating
funnel. The solution was diluted with Et2O (100 mL ), and washed
with aq 1 M HCl (50 mL), water (50 mL), 1 M aq NaOH (50 mL),
H2O (20 mL), and brine (50 mL). The organic extracts were dried
(Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated on a rotary evaporator. After
azeotropic distillation of the crude oil with hexane, a white solid
was obtained and recrystallized (EtOAc–hexane, 10 mL:200 mL) to
afford white crystals.
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): = 35.3, 61.0, 67.1, 127.2, 128.1,
128.2, 128.5, 128.8, 129.3, 135.4, 136.1, 155.9, 198.8.
References
(1) Fukuyama, T.; Lin, S.-C.; Li, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 7050.
(2) For a review on -amino aldehydes, see: Jurczak, J.;
Golebiowski, A. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 149.
Yield: 19.1 g, 76%; mp 69–70 °C (EtOAc–hexane).
(3) In Procedure 2, the optical purity of the resulting -amino
aldehyde was determined by the following procedure. An
amide was obtained via a three-step sequence: (a) NaBH4,
EtOH; (b) 10% Pd/C, H2, EtOH; (c) (R)-(+)-MTPA, DCC,
MeCN]. No peak due to N-Cbz-D-phenylalaninal ( = 3.29)
was detected (Scheme 2).
IR (CCl4): 3433, 3032, 2932, 1731, 1686, 1548, 1498, 1216 cm–1.
1H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3): = 1.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H), 2.88 (q,
J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.07 (dd, J = 7.0, 13.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.16 (dd, J = 5.4,
13.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.67–4.74 (m, 1 H), 5.10 (s, 2 H), 5.13 (br d, 1 H),
7.12–7.35 (m, 10 H).
13C NMR (67.5 Hz, CDCl3): = 14.4, 23.4, 38.4, 61.3, 67.1, 127.2,
128.1, 128.5, 128.6, 128.8, 129.3, 135.4, 136.0, 155.6, 200.4.
H2
10% Pd/C
NHCbz
NaBH4
EtOH
NHCbz
OH
Anal. Calcd for C19H21NO3S: C, 66.44; H, 6.16; N, 4.08. Found. C,
66.26; H, 6.06; N, 3.85.
Ph
H
Ph
EtOH
O
Cbz-L-Phenylalaninal (3)
OMe
CF3
(R)-(+)-MTPA
DCC
Ph
HN
A 200 mL, two-necked, round-bottomed flask equipped with a pres-
sure-equalizing funnel fitted with an Ar balloon and a magnetic stir-
ring bar was charged with Cbz-L-phenylalanine ethanethiolester (20
g, 58.2 mmol), 10% Pd/C (3.1 g, 5 mol%), and acetone (58 mL). To
the suspension was added triethylsilane (13.9 mL, 87.3 mmol) over
1 h via addition funnel at r.t.. The completion of the reaction could
be checked by TLC. The solvent was carefully removed on a rotary
evaporator. The residue was suspended in Et2O (60 mL) and the cat-
alyst was filtered off through a Celite pad and rinsed with Et2O (6
20 mL). The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to ob-
tain a crude product as a colorless oil, which solidified upon addi-
tion of hexane (30 mL). The solid was collected by filtration and
washed with cooled hexane (7 10 mL) to obtain analytically pure
product (11.3–11.6 g, 68.5–70.3%).
NH2
Ph
OH
O
CH3CN
Ph
OH
Scheme 2
(4) Kanda, Y.; Fukuyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
8451.
(5) (a) Evans, D. A.; Black, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
4497. (b) Evans, D. A.; Ng, H. P.; Rieger, D. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 11446. (c) Morimoto, Y.; Iwahashi, M.;
Nishida, K.; Hayashi, Y.; Shirahama, H. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 904. (d) Evans, D. A.; Trotter, B. W.;
Côté, B.; Coleman, P. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 2741. (e) Smith, A. B. III; Chen, S. S.-Y.; Nelson, F. C.;
Reichert, J. M.; Salvatore, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 10935. (f) Fujiwara, A.; Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T. Synlett
2000, 1667.
IR (CCl4): 3337, 3032, 2952, 1740, 1691, 1535, 1454, 1264, 1065,
738 cm–1.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): = 3.15 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.53 (q,
J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.12 (s, 2 H), 5.30 (br d, 1 H), 7.13–7.39 (m, 10
H), 9.65 (s, 1 H).
Synthesis 2002, No. 8, 1121–1123 ISSN 0039-7881 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York