2138
M. M. Joullié et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2136–2139
OBn
O
R2
R1 R2
R1
O
NH
O
OBn
OBn
OBn
O
O
N
H
O
O
HN
O
O
NHNs
a,b
BocHN
OPMB
TBSO
OPMB
TBSO
CbzN
CbzN
17 R1= R2= Me
19 R1= R2= Me (96%)
18 R1= Ethyne; R2= Me
20 R1= Ethyne; R2= Me (76%)
OBn
O
O
O
NH
OBn
OBn
OBn
O
O
N
H
O
HN
a,c
O
O
O
NHNs
HN
TBSO
OPMB
TBSO
OPMB
CbzN
O
NHBoc
CbzN
21
22
Scheme 3. Deprotection and coupling of amino acid residues. Reagents and
conditions: (a) PhSH, Cs2CO3, DMF, 0 °C, 4 h; (b) N-Boc-Gly, EDCI, HOBt, NaHCO3,
DMF, 12 h, rt; (c) N-Boc-Val-Gly, EDCI, HOBt, NaHCO3, DMF, 12 h, 0 °C to rt, 79%.
Figure 4. SpartanÒ’03 energy minimized molecular models at HF/AM1 level of
theory. Ustiloxin D (A), 2,2-dimethyl-ustiloxin D (B), and (2S)-epi-ustiloxin D (C).
The difference in inhibitory activity of ustiloxin D, (2S)-epi, and
the dimethyl species was investigated using molecular modeling
(Fig. 4). Comparison of ustiloxin D (A) to 2,2-dimethyl ustiloxin
(B) and (2S)-epi-ustiloxin (C) quite clearly shows distortion of the
glycine sidechain, progressively pushing it toward the valine resi-
due. The out-of-plane glycine sidechain may lessen the ability of
the molecule to bind at this position, but it may also block the
binding ability of the valine residue, which was shown to play an
important role in the ustiloxins inhibitory effect.6,9
OBn
O
R1 R2
O
R2
OH
R1
O
OH
NH
O
OBn
O
N
H
a,b,c
O
HN
HN
O
O
O
O
BocHN
OPMB
HO
N
H
TBSO
HN
CbzN
19 R1= R2= Me
2 R1= R2= Me
20 R1= Ethyne; R2= Me
3 R1= Ethyne; R2= Me
4. Conclusions
OBn
OH
O
Novel ustiloxin analogues were synthesized to investigate the
effect of changes at the C2 center, the macrocycle size, and the
enantiomeric series on tubulin inhibition. The structural modifica-
tions produced significant changes in the biological activity sug-
gesting the importance of the valine residue in the binding process.
O
O
NH
HN
NH
O
O
OH
OBn
O
O
HN
HN
O
O
a,b,c
O
NH
HO
N
H
TBSO
OPMB
O
NHBoc
Acknowledgments
O
HN
CbzN
22
4
We thank NIH (CA-40081) and NSF (CHE-0951394) for support
of this work. Financial support for the departmental instrumenta-
tion was provided by NIH (1S10RR23444-1). We also thank Dr.
George Furst and Dr. Rakesh Kohli for NMR and MS assistance,
respectively.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) TFA, Et3SiH, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 4 h; (b) EDCI,
HOBt, NaHCO3, DMF, 0 °C to rt, 24 h, 46% for R1 = R2 = Me, 30% for R1 = Me
R2 = ethyne, 34% for N-Gly macrocycle; (c) Pd/C, H2, THF/H2O, 24 h, 80% for 2, 60%
for 3, and 55% for 4.
References and notes
3. Bioactivity
1. (a) Koiso, Y.; Li, Y.; Kobayashi, H.; Natori, M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Iwasaki, S.; Fujita,
Y.; Sonoda, R.; Yaegashi, H., et al Tennen Yuki Kagobutsu Toronkai Koen Yoshishu
1992, 34th, 566; (b) Koiso, Y.; Natori, M.; Iwasaki, S.; Sato, S.; Sonoda, R.; Fujita,
Y.; Yaegashi, H.; Sato, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4157; (c) Koiso, Y.; Li, Y.;
Iwasaki, S.; Hanaoka, K.; Kobayashi, T.; Sonoda, R.; Fujita, Y.; Yaegashi, H.; Sato,
Z. J. Antibiot. 1994, 47, 765.
The effect of the changes present in the four analogues on the
polymerization of purified tubulin was investigated using the
IC50 value of ustiloxin D (2.5
evaluation of ent-ustiloxin D (1) showed no inhibition with an
IC50 value >40 M. Similarly, 7-N-Gly-ustiloxin D (4) showed no
inhibition (IC50 >40 M), suggesting that the naturally occurring
lM) as the benchmark. Biological
2. Hamel, E. Med. Res. Rev. 1996, 16, 207.
l
3. Hamel, E.; Covell, D. G. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents 2002, 2, 19.
4. (a) Cao, B. University of Pennsylvania, 2002; (b) Cao, B.; Park, H.; Joullié, M. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 520; (c) Tanaka, H.; Sawayama, A. M.; Wandless, T. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6864; (d) Sawayama, A. M.; Tanaka, H.; Wandless, T. J.
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8810; (e) Li, P.; Evans, C. D.; Joullié, M. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
5325.
l
ustiloxin D macrocycle size is optimum. (2S)-epi-Ustiloxin D (3)
exhibited a very slight inhibitory effect, but overall had an IC50
>40
ether bridge afforded 2,2-dimethyl ustiloxin
IC50 = 9.2 M.
l
M. Interestingly, removal of the stereogenic carbon at the
D
(2) with an
5. Li, P.; Evans, C. D.; Forbeck, E. M.; Park, H.; Bai, R.; Hamel, E.; Joullié, M. M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4804.
2
l