2116
K. A. Parker, R. W. Denton / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2115–2116
CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3
CH3
Me3Si
MOMO
CH3
NIS
DMSO
O
CO2H
CH3(CH2)9
OH
O
O
O
OH
TBSO
3
HO
CH3
CH3
I
O
(Z )-1a
CH3
I
CH3
MOMO
MOMO
O
OH
O
O
CH3
CH3
+
O
CH3
TBSO
TBSO
H
NH
CH3 CH3
(E)-2a
CH3
CH3
H
CH3
4
(Z)-2a
96% (71:29)
Figure 1. The structures of khafrefungin (3) and tirandamycin A (4).
Scheme 2.
Table 1
Yields and stereoselectivity in iododesilylation of vinyl silanes 5 as a function of
solvent
Me3Si
AcO
CH3
AcO
CH3
NIS
I
n-C5H11
OR
Me3Si
OR
C5H11-n
NIS
C5H11-n
+
I
I
TBSO
TBSO
OR
HFIP,
76%
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
(Z)-1b
(E)-2b
Scheme 3.
(Z)-5
(Z)-6
(E)-6
verted (E)-geometry in both the simple, unhindered series 5 (i.e.,
with substrate (Z)-5d) and in the case of polypropionate substrate
(Z)-1b.
Substrate 5
Yield (ratio of (Z)-6 to (E)-6)c Rxn time (h)
HFIP
MeCN/ClCH2CN (4:1)
DMSO
a (R = H)
(ꢀ)a
82% (86:14)b
85% (15:85)d
1.5
18
67
Acknowledgment
b (R = TBS)
c (R = MOM)
d (R = Ac)
72% (97:3)
0.5
53% (72:28)
2
94% (4:96)
117
This work was supported by the Army Breast Cancer Initiative
(BC 051816), the National Institutes of Health (GM 74776), and
the National Science Foundation (CHE-0131146, NMR
instrumentation).
75% (97:3)
0.5
87% (82:18)
19
86% (3:97)
6
94% (5:95)
0.5
48% (7:93)
17
43% (E)-6 only
18
a
b
c
See Ref. 4.
Solvent was neat MeCN.
Determined by integration of the NMR spectrum of the isolated vinyl iodide
References and notes
mixture.
1. Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4442.
2. Stamos, D. P.; Taylor, A. G.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8647.
3. Ilardi, E. A.; Stivala, C. E.; Zakarian, A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1727–1730.
4. Xie, Q.; Denton, R. W.; Parker, K. A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5345–5348.
5. As part of an extensive study of solvent effects on the stereoselectivity of the
halodesilylation of (E)-1-silyloctenes, Tamao had shown that NBS in DMF gave
1-bromooctenes with a high inversion: retention (Z:E) ratio; see: Tamao, K.;
Akita, M.; Maeda, K.; Kumada, M. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1100.
6. Complex intermediates that contain trisubstituted (E)-olefins adjacent to a
series of asymmetric centers are most often prepared from methyl acetylenes
by hydrozirconation/iodination or hydrostannylation/iodination; see: (a) Hart,
D. W.; Blackburn, T. F.; Schwartz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 679; (b) Benechie,
M.; Skrydstrup, T.; Khuong-Huu, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7535. They have
also been prepared from (E)-vinyl silanes by iododesilyation with retention of
geometry (our Refs. 2–4).
7. During the course of our work, Oguri and co-workers reported complete
inversion of geometry in the iododesilylation of a (Z)-trisubstituted olefin,
unsubstituted on the carbon chain, in DMF; see: Migita, A.; Shichijo, Y.; Oguri,
H. i.; Watanabe, M.; Tokiwano, T.; Oikawa, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1021.
8. For total syntheses and biological activities of khafrefungin and its isomers,
see: Shirokawa, S.; Shinoyama, M.; Ooi, I.; Hosokawa, S.; Nakazaki, A.;
Kobayashi, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 849. and references therein.
9. For leading references on tirandamycins A and B, see: Shiratani, T.; Kimura, K.;
Yoshihara, K.; Hatakeyama, S.; Irie, H.; Miyashita, M. Chem. Commun. 1996, 21.
10. Each of these compounds was fully characterized.
d
Yield based on 33% recovered starting material.
In a 4:1 mixture of MeCN/ClCH2CN, iododesilylation of (Z)-5a–c
gave product mixtures in which the (Z)-olefins predominated.
Homoallylic acetate (Z)-5d, under these conditions, again gave al-
most exclusively the (E)-olefin.
Remarkably, reaction of silanes (Z)-5a–c as well as that of silane
(Z)-5d in DMSO supplied almost entirely the inverted E-iodoolefi-
nic products.10 These results are consistent with the general prin-
ciples put forth by Tamao5 for the halodesilylation of disubstituted
vinyl silanes. They implicate a high level of participation by solvent
or, in the case of (Z)-5d, by a nearby participating functional group.
Extension of the solvent-induced inversion of double bond
geometry to more complex substrates was partially successful.
Application of the DMSO protocol to substrate (Z)-1a afforded a
disappointing 71:29 ratio of the known (Z)-2a and the desired
(E)-2a (Scheme 2). The appearance of a significant amount of the
retention product is consistent with increased steric hindrance at
the allylic position2 in substrate (Z)-1a relative to that in the model
system.
11. Alcohol 5a was prepared in three steps from 1-cyclohexyl-3-nonyn-1-ol.
Functionalization with tetramethyldisilazane (TMDS) and intramolecular
On the other hand, treatment of the acetate (Z)-1b10,13 with NIS
(in HFIP with 2,6-lutidine) gave only vinyl iodide (E)-2b10 (Scheme
3) in 76% yield after 1 h at room temperature.
In summary, both unhindered and chain-substituted (Z)-vinyl
silanes ((Z)-5 and (Z)-1a, respectively) give (Z)-vinyl iodides under
the HFIP conditions; however, only the unhindered compounds
were efficiently converted into (E)-vinyl iodides in DMSO. On the
other hand, a well-positioned participating group led to the in-
hydrosilyation
catalyzed
by
the
cationic
ruthenium
complex,
*
[Cp Ru(MeCN)3]PF6 gave the dihydrooxasiline. Ring cleavage with
methyllithium yielded hydroxy vinyl silane 5a. See: (a) Trost, B. M.; Ball, Z.
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 30; (b) Mbaye, M. D.; Demerseman, B.; Renaud, J.-
L.; Toupet, L.; Bruneau, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 835.
12. For additional evidence for this mechanism, see Refs. 2 and 3.
13. Acetate (Z)-1b was prepared by 9-BBN hydroboration of our siloxine precursor
(Ref. 4), ring opening with methyllithium, selective protection of the primary
hydroxyl group with TBSCl, and acetylation of the remaining secondary
hydroxyl group.