synthesized using Fmoc-based solid-phase synthesis. [a]2D5 -21.6
(c 0.27, MeOH); dH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, Me4Si) 0.68 (3H, d,
J = 6.7 Hz), 0.75 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.32–1.45 (2H, m), 1.45–1.55
(1H, m), 1.69–1.80 (1H, m), 1.80–1.90 (1H, m), 2.38 (1H, dd, J =
16.4 and 5.5 Hz), 2.72 (1H, dd, J = 16.4 and 8.9 Hz), 2.81 (1H,
dd, J = 13.5 and 6.1 Hz), 2.94 (1H, dd, J = 13.5 and 8.0 Hz),
3.05–3.14 (2H, m), 3.26 (1H, dd, J = 15.2 and 4.2 Hz), 3.82 (1H, t,
J = 7.4 Hz), 4.04 (1H, dd, J = 15.2 and 7.7 Hz), 4.08–4.16 (1H, m),
4.55 (1H, dd, J = 14.2 and 7.2 Hz), 4.60–4.68 (1H, m), 6.58–7.11
(1H, br s), 7.15–7.25 (5H, m), 7.58 (1H, t, J = 5.7 Hz), 7.78 (1H,
d, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.87 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.00 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz),
8.08 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 8.36 (1H, dd, J = 7.4 and 4.2 Hz) and
12.3 (1H, s); dC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6, Me4Si) 18.1, 19.1, 25.3,
28.2, 29.5, 34.8, 37.1, 40.2, 43.0, 48.8, 52.0, 53.9, 60.1, 126.1, 128.0
(2C), 129.0 (2C), 137.3, 156.6, 158.3, 169.4, 169.8, 170.6, 171.1
and 171.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z calc. for C26H39N8O7 ([M + H]+)
575.2942, found 575.2952.
52.2, 53.9, 60.1, 80.0, 86.3, 116.3, 119.7, 124.3, 126.2, 128.1 (2C),
129.0 (2C), 130.3, 131.4, 137.3, 156.0, 157.4, 169.1, 169.4, 169.9,
170.8, 171.0 and 171.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z calc. for C43H63N8O10S
([M + H]+) 883.4388, found 883.4397.
Cyclo[–Arg(Pbf)–Gly–w[C( NH)NH]-Asp(OtBu)–D-Phe–
Val–] (23b). To
a solution of amidoxime 22 (30.0 mg,
0.0330 mmol) in MeOH (0.6 cm3) and AcOH (0.006 cm3) was
R
added RANEYꢀ Ni (0.440 cm3, slurry in H2O), and the mixture
stirred under a H2 atmosphere at room temperature for 2 h.
R
The mixture was filtered through Celiteꢀ. Concentration under
reduced pressure followed by flash chromatography over silica gel
with CH2Cl2–MeOH (95/5) gave title compound 23b (27.4 mg,
95% yield) as a colorless oil: [a]2D6 -53.3 (c 0.14, CHCl3); dH
(500 MHz, CD3OD, Me4Si) 0.74 (6H, dd, J = 14.7 and 6.9 Hz),
1.43 (9H, s), 1.45 (6H, s), 1.45–1.52 (1H, m), 1.55–1.60 (1H, m),
1.82–1.89 (1H, m), 1.95–2.00 (1H, m), 2.07 (3H, s), 2.56 (3H, s),
2.59 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.77 (1H, dd, J = 16.5 and 6.9 Hz), 2.94
(1H, dd, J = 13.3 and 6.7 Hz), 2.99 (2H, s), 3.05 (1H, dd, J = 13.2
and 9.0 Hz), 3.11–3.18 (1H, m), 3.53 (1H, d, J = 15.2 Hz), 3.87
(1H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 4.28 (1H, d, J = 15.2 Hz), 4.34–4.37 (1H, m),
4.39–4.45 (1H, m), 4.68 (1H, dd, J = 9.0 and 6.9 Hz) and 7.15–
7.29 (5H, m); dC (125 MHz, CD3OD, Me4Si) 12.5, 18.4, 18.7, 19.6,
19.7, 28.4, 28.4, 28.4 (3C), 29.6 (2C), 30.9, 37.9, 38.4, 44.0, 49.5,
49.7, 54.0, 56.4, 62.5, 82.6, 87.7, 118.5, 126.0, 127.9, 129.6 (2C),
130.4 (2C), 132.4, 133.5, 134.4, 138.0, 139.4, 158.1, 160.0, 172.0,
173.3, 173.6, 173.9, 174.2 and 174.3; HRMS (FAB) m/z calc. for
C43H62N9O9S ([M - H]-) 880.4397, found 880.4395.
Evaluation of inhibitory activity against integrin-mediated cell
attachment. Human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs; AGC Techno
Glass, Chiba, Japan) were maintained in DMEM containing
10% FBS, 100 U cm-3 penicillin and 100 mg cm-3 streptomycin
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Human plasma vitronectin
(0.1 mg in 0.050 cm3 well-1; EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibbstown, NJ,
USA) were added to 96-well plates (Nalge Nunc, Rochester, NY,
USA) and incubated for 1 h at 37 ◦C. The plates were washed and
blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO, USA) in DMEM. HDFs were incubated at room
temperature for 15 min in various concentrations of peptides
(0.001–200 mM in 1% DMSO). Then, 0.100 cm3 HDFs (2 ¥ 104
cells) in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA were added to each well
and incubated at 37 ◦C for 30 min in 5% CO2. The attached cells
were stained with a 0.2% crystal violet aqueous solution in 20%
MeOH (0.150 cm3) for 15 min. After washing with Milli-Q water,
the plates were dried overnight at room temperature and dissolved
in 0.150 cm3 of a 1% SDS solution. The absorbance at 570 nm
was measured. Each sample was assayed in triplicate, and cells
attached to the BSA were subtracted from all measurements. 1%
DMSO did not have any effect on HDF attachment to vitronectin.
Cyclo[–Arg–Gly–w[C( NH)NH]–Asp–D-Phe–Val–]
(17).
Protected amidine 23b (7.90 mg, 0.00900 mmol) was treated
with 1 M TMSBr–thioanisole in TFA (10 cm3) in the presence
of m-cresol (0.1 cm3) and 1,2-ethanedithiol (0.5 cm3) at 4 ◦C
for 15 min. The mixture was poured into ice-cold dry Et2O
(50 cm3). The resulting powder was collected by centrifugation
and washed three times with ice-cold dry Et2O. The crude product
was purified by preparative HPLC to afford expected peptide
17 as a white powder (5.30 mg, 0.00660 mmol, 73% yield): [a]D25
-129.2 (c 0.17, MeOH); dH (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, Me4Si) 0.70
(3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 0.74 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.32–1.60 (3H, m),
1.73–1.84 (1H, m), 1.88–1.98 (1H, m), 2.59 (1H, dd, J = 17.0 and
5.7 Hz), 2.78 (1H, dd, J = 13.5 and 6.5 Hz), 2.84 (1H, dd, J =
17.2 and 8.2 Hz), 3.00 (1H, dd, J = 13.0 and 8.4 Hz), 3.04–3.13
(2H, m), 3.72–3.78 (2H, m), 3.90–3.98 (1H, m), 4.23 (1H, dd, J =
13.5 and 8.2 Hz), 4.43 (1H, t, J = 16.2 and 7.0 Hz), 4.53–4.60
(1H, m), 4.62–4.68 (1H, m), 6.80–7.40 (2H, br s), 7.16–7.28 (5H,
m), 7.72 (1H, t, J = 5.7 Hz), 7.93 (1H, dd, J = 11.3 and 8.4 Hz),
8.12 (1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz), 8.28–8.32 (1H, m), 8.53 (1H, d, J =
7.7 Hz), 8.92–8.98 (1H, m), 9.10–9.20 (1H, m) and 9.64 (1H, s);
dC (125 MHz, DMSO-d6, Me4Si) 17.9, 25.3, 28.2, 29.6, 34.2, 37.0,
37.1, 40.2, 51.7, 51.9, 54.2, 59.9, 126.4, 128.2 (2C), 129.1 (2C),
137.2, 156.8, 158.4, 164.8, 166.8, 170.7, 171.2, 171.3 and 171.7;
HRMS (FAB) m/z calc. for C26H40N9O6 ([M + H]+) 574.3102,
found 574.3101.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
and the Targeted Protein Research Program from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. E.
I. and K. T. are grateful for Research Fellowships from the JSPS
for Young Scientists.
Notes and references
1 For reviews, see: (a) K. Burgess, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 826; (b) M.
G. Bursavich and D. H. Rich, J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45, 541; (c) V. J.
Hruby, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 4215.
2 (a) R. J. Abraham, S. L. R. Ellison, P. Schonholzer and W. A. Thomas,
Tetrahedron, 1986, 42, 2101; (b) T. E. Christos, A. Arvanitis, G. A. Cain,
A. L. Johnson, R. S. Pottorf, S. W. Tam and W. K. Schmidt, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett., 1993, 3, 1035; (c) J. A. K. Howard, V. J. Hoy, D.
O’Hagan and G. T. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 12613; (d) J. Lin, P.
J. Toscano and J. T. Welch, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1998, 95,
14020; (e) P. Wipf, T. C. Henninger and S. J. Geib, J. Org. Chem., 1998,
63, 6088.
Cyclo(–Arg–Gly–Asp–D-Phe–Val–) (16). By an identical pro-
cedure to that described for the preparation of 17, 23a (8.00 mg,
0.00900 mmol) was converted into cyclic RGD peptide 16
(0.00790 mmol, 87% yield). All characterization data were in
agreement with the data for the control peptide, which was
3426 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 3421–3427
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©