D. Halim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 305–308
307
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada (NSERC). K.C. is also grateful to NSERC for
a Undergraduate Student Research Award (USRA).
Figure 1. Acrylamide inhibitors studied previously.10,11
Supplementary data
Chromatography procedures and spectral data of all
synthetic intermediates are available. Supplementary
data associated with this article can be found, in the on-
Within each series it can be noted that efficiency increas-
es with chain length. This trend has also been observed
for three other series of inhibitors based on the same
peptide scaffold.10,12 Since TGases are designed to ex-
clude asparagine residues as acyl-donor substrates,
reacting only with glutamine residues, they are capable
of discriminating against substrate analogs having short
side chains. However, tTG cannot exclude longer acyl-
donor substrates (or irreversible inhibitors) having the
conformational flexibility necessary to properly position
their pendant reactive groups near the active site thiol.
References and notes
1. Folk, J. E.; Cole, P. W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 22,
244.
2. Achyuthan, K. E.; Slaughter, T. F.; Santiago, M. A.;
Enghild, J. J.; Greenberg, C. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268,
21284.
3. Greenberg, C. S.; Birkbichler, P. J.; Rice, R. H. FASEB J.
1991, 5, 3071.
4. Kim, S.-Y.; Jeitner, T. M.; Steinert, P. M. Neurochem. Int.
2002, 40, 85.
5. Cooper, A. J. L.; Jeitner, T. M.; Gentile, V.; Blass, J. P.
Neurochem. Int. 2002, 40, 53.
6. Singer, S. M.; Zainelli, G. M.; Norlund, M. A.; Lee, J. M.;
Muma, N. A. Neurochem. Int. 2002, 40, 17.
7. Karpuj, M. V.; Becker, M. W.; Steinman, L. Neurochem.
Int. 2002, 40, 31.
8. Choi, K.; Siegel, M.; Piper, J. L.; Yuan, L.; Cho, E.;
Strnad, P.; Omary, B.; Rich, K. M.; Khosla, C. Chem.
Biol. 2005, 12, 469.
9. Hausch, F.; Halttunen, T.; Ma¨ki, M.; Khosla, C. Chem.
Biol. 2003, 10, 225.
It is also instructive to draw a comparison with a series
of acrylamide inhibitors studied previously. As shown in
Figure 1, acrylamides 2g–4g also comprise a dipeptide
scaffold having a comparable C-terminal ester, and their
pharmacophore differs from maleimide by only one car-
bonyl completing the heterocycle. Compounds 2g–4g
were determined11 to have KI values in the range of
0.23–0.85 lM, and their efficiency constants are shown
in Table 1. From this comparison it is evident that the
maleimides are ꢀ103- to 104-fold less efficient inhibitors.
Although direct comparison of reactivity and affinity
constants is not possible, one may presume that the
maleimides possess inherently greater reactivity (larger
kinact values), given the activation of the double bond to-
ward nucleophilic addition by two conjugated carbonyl
groups. By this reasoning, it would appear that the affin-
ity constants of the maleimides are well above those
measured for the acrylamides (even larger KI values).
This is consistent with the lack of complete saturation
that was observed for the maleimides, for concentrations
up to 750 lM. Our modeling of the glutamine substrate
binding tunnel of tTG25 suggests that it is a sterically
constrained environment that may not easily accommo-
date the greater volume of the cyclic maleimide group.
Furthermore, this hypothesis is supported by our obser-
vation that any substitution for example, by methyl or
phenyl, on the c-carboxamide nitrogen of glutamine re-
sults in the complete loss of donor substrate activity.27
´
10. de Macedo, P.; Marrano, C.; Keillor, J. W. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2002, 10, 355.
´
11. Marrano, C.; de Macedo, P.; Keillor, J. W. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2001, 9, 1923.
12. Marrano, C.; de Macedo, P.; Gagnon, P.; Lapierre, D.;
´
Gravel, C.; Keillor, J. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9,
3231.
13. Folk, J. E.; Chung, S. I. Methods Enzymol. 1985, 113, 358.
14. Starting materials were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich.
15. Procedure A: Boc protection. Compounds 2a, 3a, and 4a
(1.75 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL of methanol. After
the addition of 1.45 mL of triethylamine (10.5 mmol),
460 mg of (Boc)2O (2.10 mmol) and a few drops of 1 M
NaOH were added. The mixture was stirred overnight at
room temperature and then evaporated under reduced
pressure. The residue was dissolved in 20 mL of 1 N
NaOH. The aqueous phase was washed with 3· 20 mL
CH2Cl2 and acidified to pH ꢀ1.5 by the addition of 6 N
HCl. The product was extracted with 3· 25 mL EtOAc
and the organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
evaporated under reduced pressure to give the final
product (36–81% yield).
In summary, the series of novel maleimide inhibitors
presented herein confirm the validity of the peptidic
scaffold, bearing an electrophilic ‘warhead’ on a long
side-chain, for the design of small molecule inhibitors
that target the active site of tTG. The maleimide group
itself, although well known for inactivation of thiol-de-
pendent enzymes, appears to be just large enough to de-
crease the ease of its insertion and productive
orientation in the narrow donor substrate binding tun-
nel of tTG.
16. Procedure B: Benzyl ester formation. In the dark, com-
pounds 2b, 3b, and 4b (1.15 mmol) were dissolved in
10 mL DMF. After the addition of 0.17 mL of benzyl
bromide (1.38 mmol), 0.24 mL of triethylamine
(1.73 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred overnight
at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then