S. A. Testero et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 2675–2678
2677
Table 2 (continued)
Entry
Trifluoroborate
Product
Yielda (%)
BF3K
O
10
11
HO
14(41)
HO
S
O O
S
BF3K
O
N
—
—
0 (12)
0 (78)
O
12
BF3K
a
Isolated yield; data in parentheses are the recovered starting materials.
As a final effort to enable Ullmann cross-coupling diversifica-
tion from 2 as an intermediate, we explored the use of aryl triflu-
oroborates for phenol O-arylation as described by Batey and
Quach. The result from the initial reaction (Table 1, entry 1). was
encouraging. Given the modest yield for 1, and the intrinsic com-
plexity of this reaction—key variables include the choice of copper
salt catalyst, catalyst loading, catalyst ligand, reagent stoichiome-
try, solvent, temperature, oxidant, and nature of the molecular
sieves and its source—we explored many of these variables as a
prelude to library diversification. Cu(OAc)2 was chosen as the Cu(II)
source. The addition of 1,2-dimethylimidazole24 and N-methylim-
idazole25 monodentate copper ligands, as were recently used in
similar copper-catalyzed cross-couplings, gave a small increase in
the reaction yield. 1,2-Dimethylimidazole was the better ligand
of the two. DMSO and MeCN as sole solvents, or as co-solvents
(in different ratios) with dichloromethane, were compared to
dichloromethane alone. None of these changes improved the
yields. The use of 5 equiv (instead of 2 equiv) of the potassium phe-
nyltrifluorborate actually reduced the yield. This outcome may be
attributed to phenyltrifluorborate homocoupling.24 Furthermore,
we discovered that different sources for the molecular sieves, all
exhaustively activated at 200 °C under vacuum prior to use, gave
different yields. These differences may be attributed to the
variability of the constituents and the mixtures of ingredient
minerals in different molecular sieves from different origins.
As is shown in Table 1, we decided to increase the amount of
copper using DMAP as ligand. We found that 1 equiv of Cu(OAc)2,
0.2 equiv of DMAP, 2 equiv of potassium phenyltrifluoroborate in
the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves gave the best results for this
funtionalization (Table 1, entry 4). As Batey and Quach observed
previously, under these conditions, phenylboronic acid also under-
goes cross-coupling with phenol 2, although in lower yield (with
15% of cross-coupling product and 49% of starting material
recovered).
The mechanism of this copper-mediated oxidative coupling
with organotrifluoroborates is believed to go through a CuIII spe-
cies. Stahl and co-workers26 have suggested that after the initial
transmetallation, the resulting aryl-CuII species is oxidized by an-
other equivalent of CuII to yield an aryl-CuIII intermediate, which
undergoes facile C–O reductive elimination.
Notwithstanding the modesty in yields, the procedure em-
ployed in the present study allows for a single-step rapid assembly
of a series of analogs of 1 with variations in the ether moiety in the
last step on a structurally sensitive precursor. We have expanded
the mild and essentially neutral conditions developed by Batey
and Quach for the syntheses of alkenyl–aryl and aryl–aryl ethers.
The reaction was successfully applied to the base-labile thiirane
2 to generate a series of analogs of gelatinase inhibitor 1.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Grant from the National
Institutes of Health (CA122417). The Mass Spectrometry
&
Proteomics Facility at the University of Notre Dame is supported
by a Grant from the National Science Foundation, (CHE-0741793).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400.
2. Quach, T. D.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1381.
3. (a) Molander, G. A.; Figueroa, R. Aldrichimica Acta 2005, 38, 49; (b) Stefani, H. A.;
Cella, R.; Vieira, A. S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3623; (c) Molander, G. A.; Ellis, N. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 275; (d) Darses, S.; Genet, J. P. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 288.
4. Molander, G. A.; Cooper, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3885. and references
therein.
5. Brown, S.; Bernardo, M. M.; Li, Z. H.; Kotra, L. P.; Tanaka, Y.; Fridman, R.;
Mobashery, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6799.
6. Lee, M.; Bernardo, M. M.; Meroueh, S. O.; Brown, S.; Fridman, R.; Mobashery, S.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4463.
7. Forbes, C.; Shi, Q.; Fisher, J. F.; Lee, M.; Hesek, D.; Llarrull, L. I.; Toth, M.;
Gossing, M.; Fridman, R.; Mobashery, S. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 74, 527.
8. Tao, P.; Fisher, J. F.; Mobashery, S.; Schlegel, H. B. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2559.
9. Celenza, G.; Villegas-Estrada, A.; Lee, M.; Boggess, B.; Forbes, C.; Wolter, W. R.;
Suckow, M. A.; Mobashery, S.; Chang, M. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2008, 71, 187.
10. Lee, M.; Villegas-Estrada, A.; Celenza, G.; Boggess, B.; Toth, M.; Kreitinger, G.;
Forbes, C.; Fridman, R.; Mobashery, S.; Chang, M. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 70,
371.
11. Ikejiri, M.; Bernardo, M. M.; Bonfil, R. D.; Toth, M.; Chang, M.; Fridman, R.;
Mobashery, S. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 33992.
12. Bonfil, R. D.; Sabbota, A.; Nabha, S.; Bernardo, M. M.; Dong, Z.; Meng, H.;
Yamamoto, H.; Chinni, S. R.; Lim, I. T.; Chang, M.; Filetti, L. C.; Mobashery, S.;
Cher, M. L.; Fridman, R. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 118, 2721.
13. Kruger, A.; Arlt, M. J. E.; Gerg, M.; Kopitz, C.; Bernardo, M. M.; Chang, M.;
Mobashery, S.; Fridman, R. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3523.
14. Martin, M. D.; Carter, K. J.; Jean-Philippe, S. R.; Chang, M.; Mobashery, S.;
Thiolloy, S.; Lynch, C. C.; Matrisian, L. M.; Fingleton, B. Cancer Res. 2008, 68,
6251.
We realize that when the number of components for the reac-
tion is many (as is required for this reaction), many different con-
ditions could be tried. Regardless, the conditions given in Table 1,
entry 4, were satisfactory and we were poised to prepare a series
of analogs of compound 1 by this method. The results of these ef-
forts are given in Table 2.
As Batey and Quach noted, electron-rich aryl trifluoroborates
give the best results (Table 2, entries 5 and 7), whereas electron-
deficient aryl trifluoroborates with electron-withdrawing groups
at the para position and alkyl organotrifluoroborates did not react,
when treated with phenol 2 (Table 2, entries 11 and 12). However,
the electron-deficient potassium 3-nitrophenyltrifluoroborate
(Table 2, entry 4), with an electron-withdrawing group at the meta
position, furnished the desired product in a moderate yield. With
the exception of potassium trans-styryltrifluoroborate (Table 2,
entry 2), alkenyl and heterocyclic trifluoroborates were modest
cross-coupling partners (Table 2, entries 3 and 6).