J. D. Majmudar et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 2616–2620
2619
O
O
S Cl
S
SH
O
O
a
b
O
12
11
13
c
S
O
O
O
S
OH
N
H
O
14
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) Li wire, DTTB, THF, À78 °C to room temp, 45%; (b) NCS (4 equiv), 2 M HCl/ACN (1:1), 20 °C, 92%; (c) farnesyl cysteine, 2N Na2CO3/
dioxane, 63%.
For the analogs that contain the alkyl chain, the base in the
S-alkylation step was changed to 2 M sodium hydroxide in ethanol
as described before (see Supplementary data for more detail).15,16
Although racemization at the alpha carbon is certainly a possibil-
ity, we did not investigate for this possibility. The structures of
these analogs are shown in Figure 4. These analogs were evaluated
as inhibitors and substrates of hIcmt using the VDA.
inhibitory activity although more analogs need to be evaluated to
corroborate this result.
Finally, we wanted to incorporate the phenoxyphenyl motif
(Fig. 2) that is a part of the most potent AMFCs into the SMFC scaf-
fold. As 2-phenoxy-phenyl sulfonyl chloride is not commercially
available, we synthesized it and then coupled it to farnesyl cys-
teine. Scheme 2 shows the synthesis of POP-SMFC that uses a
lithium mediated homolytic C–S bond cleavage in phenoxathin17
followed by oxidative chlorination18 to yield the sulfonylchloride
13 of interest.
The percent inhibition of compounds 7a–c and 8a–b are shown
in Table 2. None of these compounds exhibited substrate activity at
25
l
M.
Analogs 7a–c and 8a–b are relatively poor inhibitors of hIcmt as
Compound 14, the SMFC analog of POP-FC (1) inhibits hIcmt by
compared to their farnesyl analogs (compounds 6r, 6ae and 6af).
These data illustrate that the farnesyl group is highly important
for hIcmt inhibition by SMFCs. Increased chain length of the prenyl
group appears to be a key factor in hIcmt inhibition. Also, the fact
that analog 8a exhibits very similar inhibition to 7b illustrates that
the geranyl and the hexyl chains make little difference in the bio-
logical activities of these analogs. The fact that compound 8b only
showed marginal improvement in inhibition over 8a also strength-
ens our hypothesis that a longer prenyl chain is a key for hIcmt
inhibition. Overall, these data suggest that a determining factor
for hIcmt inhibition by SMFCs is the presence of the farnesyl chain,
imparting a specific binding interaction rather than simply hydro-
phobic bulk.
55% at 10 lM and has an IC50 of 18.4 1.8 lM as determined by
the VDA. Although most SMFCs are better, or equal inhibitors of
hIcmt as compared to AMFCs, POP-SMFC (14) is a poorer inhibitor
of hIcmt as compared to its amide counterpart.
Overall, we have shown that the sulfonamide bond is a viable
replacement for the amide bond in AFC derived hIcmt inhibitors.
We have also explored the structure–activity relationship of SMFCs
as hIcmt inhibitors. The most potent analog, 6ag has an IC50 of
8.8 0.5 lM. We have demonstrated that the farnesyl group of
SMFCs is a necessary structural motif for hIcmt inhibition and that
stereochemistry of the alpha carbon does not play a significant role
in inhibiting hIcmt. We have also highlighted the importance of the
carboxylate motif in SMFCs for hIcmt inhibition, but this result
needs further evaluation.
In comparison to the AMFCs, the SMFC library is superior for a
number of reasons. Notably, the lead SMFC 6ag exhibits superior
ligand efficiency19 to POP and POP-3-MB. While the AMFC library
yielded several substrates for hIcmt, the SMFC library showed no
substrate activity. Our lead, 6ag is a step in the right direction be-
cause it has a lower molecular weight, a lower C Log P, a higher
tPSA and overall a more ‘drug-like’ character. These encouraging
data are fueling our efforts in designing and evaluating novel scaf-
folds as amide isosteres for achieving potent hIcmt inhibition.
Having determined the role of the farnesyl group in hIcmt inhi-
bition by SMFCs, we next wanted to evaluate the effect of stereo-
chemistry at the alpha carbon of the SMFCs. To achieve this goal,
we synthesized the (S) enantiomers of compounds 6ae and 6af.
These were synthesized in a manner similar to the one shown in
Scheme 1, using
of these analogs are shown in Figure 5.
Interestingly, analogs 9a–b exhibited identical inhibition pro-
files at 10 M as compared to compounds 6ae and 6af. There
D-cysteine in place of L-cysteine. The structures
l
was little to no difference in the inhibition profiles of the
two enantiomers (data not shown). The enantiomers also did
not exhibit any substrate activity. The fact that stereochemistry
at the alpha carbon did not play a significant role in hIcmt
inhibition by SMFCs coupled with the knowledge that the far-
nesyl group appeared to be a key factor for inhibition leads
us to hypothesize that the farnesyl chain in either enantiomer
is able to adopt a favorable conformation and enables the SMFC
to inhibit hIcmt.
Next, we wanted to evaluate the importance of the carboxylate
motif of SMFCs for hIcmt inhibition. Toward this aim, we synthe-
sized the methyl ester analog (compound 10) of 6ag (details for
synthesis in Supplementary data). Strikingly, this analog exhibited
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH/NCI Grant R01CA112483 (to
R.A.G.), and by NIH/NCI P30CA21328 (to the Purdue University
Center for Cancer Research).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
only 10% hIcmt inhibition at 10 lM in the VDA. Although com-
References and notes
pound 6ag is the most potent SMFC, its ester, compound 10, is a
remarkably poor hIcmt inhibitor. This leads us to hypothesize that
a deviation from the carboxylate group greatly reduces hIcmt
1. Konstantinopoulos, P. A.; Karamouzis, M. V.; Papavassiliou, A. G. Nat. Rev. Drug
Disc. 2007, 6, 540.