ACS Combinatorial Science
LETTER
Table 1. Selected Results from This “One-Pot” 3-Step
Pyrazine Library Preparation
Yield and purity data for selected compounds can be seen in
Table 1.
To summarize, we have developed an efficient 3-step one-
pot reaction by rational reaction design, relying on cascading
reactions types of increasing tolerance with simple concentra-
tions between steps. In this particular case, we started the sequence
with the most sensitive reaction (Mitsunobu alkylation) and
finished with the least sensitive reaction (ammonolysis “drown
out”) and proved that, with a well designed route and a rapid
preparative mass-triggered LCMS purification method, one can
access large libraries in a matter of weeks on pharmacologically
interesting and diverse skeletons. We also hope that this paper
does illustrate nicely that, chemistry permitting of course, one
can achieve acceptable to excellent final purity profiles and yields
without the constraints of developing a solid-phase supported
synthesis.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
1
S
Supporting Information. Experimental procedures, H
b
NMR and LCMS data of a selection of compounds highlighted in
the manuscript. This material is available free of charge via the
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: craig.harris2@astrazeneca.com.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank the Reims support team,
particularly Pascal Boutron and Nadine Gondouin, for their help
during the preparation of this large library.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Teicher, B. A. Newer cytotoxic agents: attacking cancer broadly.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 1610–1617.
(2) (a) Ding, J.; Feng, Y.; Wang, H.-Y. From cell signaling to cancer
therapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2007, 9, 1494–1498. (b) Traxler, P; Bold,
G; Buchdunger, E; Caravatti, G; Furet, P; Manley, P; O’Reilly, T; Wood,
J; Zimmermann, J. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: from rational design to
clinical trials. Med. Res. Rev. 2001, 21, 499–512. (c) Zuccotto, F.; Ardini,
E.; Casale, E.; Angiolini, M. Through the “Gatekeeper Door”: Exploiting
the active kinase conformation. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 2681–2694 and
references cited therein. (d) Morphy, R. Selectively nonselective kinase
inhibition: Striking the right balance. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 1413–1437.
(3) According to a news release from the World Health Organization
in 2003, the figure of 10 million new cases of cancer per year recorded in
2000 is expected to reach 15 million cases per year by 2020 (http://
www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr27/en/).
(4) (a) Woodburn, J. R.; Barker, A. J.; Gibson, K. H.; Ashton, S. E.;
Wakeling, A. E. ZD 1839, an epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase
inhibitors selected for clinical development. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res.
1997, 38, 6333. (b) Gibson, K. H.; Grundy, W.; Godfrey, A.; Woodburn,
J. R.; Ashton, S. E.; Curry, B. J.; Scarlet, L.; Barker, A. J.; Brown, D. S.
Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase: structure-activity
relationships and antitumor activity of novel quinazolines. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2723–2727.
subsequent SuzukiꢀMiyaura cross-coupling. After 30 min in the
microwave, the reaction mixtures were concentrated to dryness
in their pressure tubes, recapped and dissolved in a fresh solution
of methanolic ammonia (7 N) and reacted under microwave
irradiation to effect the transesterification to the primary carbox-
amide. The resulting crude reaction mixtures were concentrated
to dryness and dissolved in DMF, filtered and purified directly
without any workup prior to injection. The DMF solutions were
purified using a Waters X-Terra reverse-phase column (C-18,
5 μm silica, 19 mm diameter, 100 mm length, flow rate of 40 mL/
minute) and decreasingly polar mixtures of water (containing 1%
acetic acid) and acetonitrile as eluent. The fractions containing
the desired compound were evaporated to dryness to afford the
final compounds (9), generally as solids with average purities of
(5) Laird, A. D.; Cherrington, J. M. Small molecule tyrosine kinase
inhibitors: clinical development of anticancer agents. Expert Opin. Invest.
Drugs 2003, 12, 51–64.
(6) (a) Klebl, B. M.; M€uller, G. Second-generation kinase inhibitors.
Expert Opin. Ther. Targ. 2005, 9, 975–993. (b) Laird, A. D.; Cherrington,
1
>95% as judged qualitatively by U.V. (254 nm) and H NMR.
451
dx.doi.org/10.1021/co200062n |ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 449–452