DOI: 10.1002/anie.201101501
Molecular Motor
A Molecular Four-Stroke Motor**
Gebhard Haberhauer*
Dedicated to Professor Rolf Gleiter on the occasion of his 75th birthday
One of the most challenging aspect in the construction of
molecular analogues of mechanical devices[1–4] is the creation
of synthetic molecular motors which utilize the unidirectional
movements of smaller parts and which thus should be able to
perform a physical task.[5,6] Almost all synthetic molecular
motors described to date are rotary motors. The axis of the
rotation in these motors is a single or a double chemical bond
or a mechanical bond, and is coincident with the center where
energy is transformed into mechanical work.[7,8] As their
flexible parts remain the same size during a cycle, they
perform a simple rotation like that found in the F1-ATPase in
nature.[9] Thus they are designed to transport an attached
molecule in a rotation movement of 3608, but they are not
able to transport surrounding molecules in one definite
direction—they just distribute them in a circular movement.
Herein we present a synthetic molecular motor that has a
motion sequence which resembles the movement of motile
cilia.[10] Motile cilia are widely found in nature and, through
their beating movement, are used either for the transport of
particles and surrounding medium or for the locomotion of
cells. As our motor works in a similar way, it should
automatically push surrounding molecules in a definite
direction during a four-stroke cycle. The essential principle
is the spatial separation of the area where chemical energy is
transformed into mechanical work, from the rotation axis.
The design and the concept of our molecular four-stroke
motor is illustrated in Figure 1. The central part of the motor
is a chiral clamp,[11] which we have already successfully used
for the control of unidirectional movements and for the
design of a molecular chirality pendulum.[12,13] Through the
chiral clamp, the clamp-bound pyridine rings of the bipyridine
units are fixed in a cycle, and thus adopt a P configuration
with respect to each other. One of the bipyridine units carries
a light-switchable azobenzene unit and is the chemically
driven pushing blade of the motor. The other bipyridine unit
acts as a stopper and controls the direction of the movement.
An alternating stimulation of the whole blade and the
azobenzene unit of the blade leads in sum to a 3608 rotation
of the phenyl group of the azobenzene unit around a virtual
axis.
Letꢀs consider the states of the rotation process in detail.
The molecule trans-(P)-1 corresponds to state I of the rotation
cycle. As non-complexed 2,2’-biypridine units have an N-C-C-
N dihedral angle of about 1808,[14] the arm of the blade
(azobenzene unit) and the arm of the stopper (bromine) in
trans-(P)-1 have a definite relative spatial configuration (the
P configuration).[13] The addition of salts containing metal
ions, such as Zn2+, leads to a complexation of the 2,2’-
bipyridines and thus the complex trans-(M)-1*Zn24+ is formed
which represents state IV of the rotation cycle. As metal-
complexed 2,2’-bipyridines have a N-C-C-N dihedral angle of
around 08, the transition from state I to state IV is
accompanied by a movement of the blade. The reversibility
of this movement—the backward movement of the blade—is
achieved chemically by the addition of cyclam which com-
plexes the Zn2+ ions better than the bipyridine units of 1. The
second important process for the cycle is the light-induced
switching of the azo group.[15] In the trans configuration of the
azo group (state I) the para-bonded hydrogen atom points
away from the bipyridine unit whereas in the cis configuration
(state II) it is orientated toward the bipyridine unit. Thus, the
trans!cis isomerization of the azobenzene group triggered
by UV irradiation (l = 355 nm) is accompanied by a folding of
the blade. This transition (I!II) is also reversible. The
reverse state change from II!I takes place on a brief
irradiation of the cis isomer with visible light. The whole
rotation cycle consists of an alternating combination of the
rotation movement of the blade and its light-induced folding
and opening: Exposure of trans-(P)-1 to UV light at 208C
induces trans!cis isomerization and results in a transition
from state I to state II (first stroke). The addition of Zn2+
leads to a movement of the blade (second stroke) and the
complex cis-(M)-1*Zn24+ representing state III in the cycle is
formed. This stroke resembles the recovery stroke of motile
cilia. The third stroke (III!IV; opening of the blade) is the
4+
cis!trans back isomerization to trans-(M)-1*Zn2 induced
by visible light. The backward movement of the opened blade
triggered by the addition of cyclam (fourth stroke) resembles
the effective stroke of motile cilia. As the opened blade can
push more molecules in one direction (fourth stroke) than the
closed blade in the other (second stroke) there should be a net
transport of the surrounding molecules in one direction.
An important requirement for the motor is that the
movement of the blade must proceed unidirectionally. To
check if this is true for the motor 1, the reference compound 2
was investigated. The only difference between 1 and 2 is the
absence of the azobenzene unit in molecule 2. In principle
there are two possible ways for the movement of the blade. In
[*] Prof. Dr. G. Haberhauer
Institut fꢀr Organische Chemie, Fakultꢁt fꢀr Chemie
Universitꢁt Duisburg-Essen
Universitꢁtsstrasse 7, 45117 Essen (Germany)
E-mail: gebhard.haberhauer@uni-due.de
[**] This work was generously supported by the Deutschen For-
schungsgemeinschaft (DFG). We thank Dr. Andreea Schuster for
helpful discussions and Helma Kallweit and Petra Schneider for
assistance in synthesis.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6415 –6418
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
6415