E.M. Pasciak et al. / Electrochimica Acta 127 (2014) 159–166
161
bath. Each reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 ◦C and then
transferred to a separatory funnel; the organic layer was separated,
washed twice with brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate,
and concentrated with the aid of rotary evaporation. Products 1a
and 1c were purified by recrystallization of each resulting solid,
respectively, from ethanol and water, whereas 1b was obtained
as a yellow oil via vacuum distillation. Melting points for the two
solids were found to be as follows: 1a (Mp 66–67 ◦C); 1c (Mp
133–134 ◦C). High-resolution mass spectral data for these three
compounds are as follows: (a) for 1a, HRMS (ESI) m/z: calculated for
C9H10ClNO [M]+ 183.0445, found 183.0449; (b) for 1b, HRMS (ESI)
m/z: calculated for C10H12ClNO [M]+ 197.0602, found 197.0597;
(c) for 1c, HRMS (ESI) m/z: calculated for C8H8ClNO [M]+ 169.0289,
found 169.0288.
2.5. General procedure for synthesis of products (3a–3c)
We prepared N-methyl-N-phenylacetamide (3a), N-ethyl-N-
phenylacetamide (3b), and N-phenylacetamide (3c) according to
the protocol described in the preceding section by substituting
acetyl chloride for chloroacetyl chloride. Compounds 3a and 3c
were obtained as colorless crystals, and 3b was isolated as a yellow
oil by means of vacuum distillation. High-resolution mass spectral
data for these three compounds are as follows: (a) for 3a, HRMS
(ESI) m/z: calculated for C9H11NO [M]+ 149.0835, found 149.0834;
(b) for 3b, HRMS (ESI) m/z: calculated for C10H13NO [M]+ 163.0992,
found 163.0991; (c) for 3c, HRMS (ESI) m/z: calculated for C8H9NO
[M]+ 135.0679, found 135.0681.
Fig. 3. Cyclic voltammograms recorded at 100 mV s−1 for reduction of 1.0 mM
nickel(II) salen in the absence (solid curve) and in the presence of 2.0 mM 2-chloro-
N-methyl-N-phenylacetamide (1a, dashed curve) at a glassy carbon cathode scanned
from ca. –0.05 to –1.25 to –0.05 V in DMF containing 0.050 M TMABF4.
was utilized, and the auxiliary anode was a graphite rod immersed
in a DMF–0.050 M TMABF4 solution separated from the cath-
ode compartment by a sintered-glass disk backed by a methyl
cellulose–DMF–0.050 M TMABF4 plug.
2.6. Syntheses of N,Nꢀ-dimethyl-N,Nꢀ-diphenylsuccinamide (5a)
and N,Nꢀ-diethyl-N,Nꢀ-diphenylsuccinamide (5b)
2.3. Separation, identification, and quantitation of electrolysis
products
At the end of each controlled-potential (bulk) electrolysis, the
catholyte was partitioned three times between diethyl ether and
brine. Then the ether phase was dried over anhydrous sodium
sulfate and concentrated with the aid of rotary evaporation.
Products were separated and identified by means of gas chro-
matography (GC) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
(GC–MS). Each chromatograph (Agilent 7890A) was equipped with
a 30 m × 0.25 mm capillary column (J & W Scientific) with a DB-
5 stationary phase; the GC system utilized a flame-ionization
detector, whereas the GC–MS system contained an inert mass-
selective detector operating in electron ionization mode (70 eV).
Gas chromatographic retention times and mass spectral data for the
electrolysis products were compared with those for commercially
available or chemically synthesized authentic samples.
Procedures used for the quantitation of electrolysis products
have been described in an earlier paper [24]. Peak areas for the
different products were determined with respect to an internal
standard (n-hexadecane) added in known amount to the electrol-
ysis cell prior to the start of a controlled-potential reduction.
Identities of the several starting materials and products, syn-
thesized as described below, were confirmed by means of both
1H and 13C NMR spectrometry (400 MHz, Varian Inova) and high-
resolution GC–MS (Thermo Electron Corporation) coupled to a
MAT-95XP magnetic-sector mass spectrometer.
We prepared the title compounds according to the follow-
ing general procedure based, with some modification, on that
employed for the synthesis of compounds 1a–1c. Freshly dis-
tilled N-methylaniline or N-ethylaniline (18.5 mmol) was added
to 40 mL of cold ethyl acetate (in an ice bath). To this mixture
was added sodium hydroxide (4 g, 100 mmol) dissolved in 20 mL
of water, and the solution was allowed to cool to near 0 ◦C. Suc-
cinyl chloride (1.5 mL, 13.6 mmol) was slowly added, with stirring,
to the reaction mixture and stirring was continued for 1 h. After
the organic layer was separated, it was washed twice with brine,
and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Solvent was removed
under reduced pressure, and the solid product was recrystallized
from ethanol–water. A melting point and spectroscopic data were
acquired for each compound: (a) for 5a, Mp 155–156 ◦C; 1H NMR
(CDCl3): ␦ 2.33 (s, 4H), 3.23 (s, 6H), 7.23–7.42 (m, 10H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3): ␦ 29.5, 37.2, 127.4, 128.5, 129.7, 143.9, 172.8; HRMS
(ESI) m/z: calculated for C18H20N2NaO2 [M + Na]+ 319.1422; found
319.1412; (b) for 5b, Mp 104–105 ◦C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): ␦ 1.05 (t,
J = 7.2 Hz, 6H), 2.26 (s, 4H), 3.72 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.19–7.42 (m,
10H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): ␦ 13.1, 29.9, 44.0, 127.8, 128.6, 129.7, 142.3,
171.4; HRMS (ESI) m/z: calculated for C20H24N2NaO2 [M + Na]+
347.1735; found 347.1728.
2.7. Computational methods
2.4. General procedure for synthesis of chloroacetamides (1a–1c)
Computational studies involving density functional theory were
out with the Gaussian suite of electronic structure programs [25].
Geometry optimizations were done with the popular B3LYP den-
sity functional [26,27] that uses a standard 6-31 + G(d,p) basis set
[28,29]. At this level of theory, the nature of the stationary points
(minima or transition states) as well as zero-point vibrational
We
synthesized
(1a),
and
purified
2-chloro-N-methyl-N-
phenylacetamide
2-chloro-N-ethyl-N-phenylacetamide
(1b), and 2-chloro-N-phenylacetamide (1c) according to the
procedure outlined by Hennessy and Buchwald [15], which entails
the reaction of 1 equivalent of N-alkylaniline or aniline with 1.5
equivalents of chloroacetyl chloride in a 2:1 ethyl acetate–water
mixture and in the presence of 3 equivalents of KOH in an ice–water