N. Raman et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1000 (2011) 135–144
137
tested substance was determined by microscopic observation of
microbial growth. It corresponds to the well with the lowest con-
centration of the tested substance where microbial growth was
clearly inhibited [19].
1550, 1455
m
(ArAC@C), 1311
m
(CAO), 550–575
m
(ZnAO), 430–455
m(ZnAN); UV–Vis (kmax, nm) (DMF): 346 and 370; molar conduc-
tance (DMF): 4.3 ohmꢁ1 cm2 molꢁ1
; leff (B.M.): Diamagnetic.
3. Results and discussion
2.5. Synthesis
3.1. Physicochemical properties of the synthesized compounds
2.5.1. Synthesis of Schiff base ligand (HL)
A mixture of 20-methylacetoacetoanilide (10 mmol 1.911 g),
2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine (10 mmol 1.110 g) and few drops of
acetic acid in 50 mL ethanolic solution was refluxed for 3 h. After
cooling to room temperature, the solution was neutralized with
concentrated aqueous ammonia. Brownish yellow color precipitate
was obtained, washed with water and ethanol, and dried in vacuo.
The resulting solid product was recrystallized from ethanol at
60 °C.
The ligand was prepared by refluxing an appropriate amount of
20-methylacetoacetoanilide with 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine in
1:1 molar ratio and the complexes were formed with the metal
salts and ligand in the ratio of 1:2. Formation of the complexes
can be represented by the following general equation:
MX2 þ 2HL ! ½ML2ꢂ þ 2HX
where M = Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II); X = Cl; HL = Schiff base ligand,
Formulation of the complexes has been done on the basis of their
elemental analysis data, molar conductance values, magnetic sus-
ceptibility, IR and 1H NMR data. All the complexes show 1:2 me-
tal–ligand stoichiometry. They are non-hygroscopic, decomposed
above 200 °C and possess good keeping qualities. The molar con-
ductance values in DMF (Table 1) reveal the non-electrolytic nature
of the complexes [20].
C
16H17N3O2: Yield (%): 77.78, brownish yellow, M.pt: 145 °C,
M.Wt: 283, Anal. Calc. (%): C, 67.82; H, 6.04; N, 14.83. Found (%):
C, 67.76; H, 5.92; N, 14.85; 1H NMR (CDCl3, d, ppm): 2.20 (s, 3H, ali-
phatic-CH3).), 2.75 (s, 3H, aromatic-CH3), 3.62 (s, 2H, CACH2AC),
6.85–7.82 (m, 7H, ArAH), 8.60 (s, 1H, CONH), 10.85 (s, 1H, ArAOH);
IR (KBr,
2920,
m
m
cmꢁ1): 3383
(aliphatic-CH), 1655
m
(OH), 3255
(CONH), 1612
(ArAC@C), 1255, m
m
(NH), 3051
m
(ArACH), 2982,
(C@N), 1575
(CAO). UV–
m
m
m
m
[(C@N)(pyridine)], 1548, 1460
Vis (kmax, nm) (DMF): 345, 362.
3.2. Electronic spectra and magnetic properties of metal(II) complexes
2.5.2. Synthesis of metal complexes
The electronic spectra were recorded in DMF solution and data
are given in the Table 1. The ligand exhibits absorption bands in
UV–Vis region around 345 and 362 nm. The first band below
Hot ethanolic solutions of appropriate metal chloride salts of
Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) (0.237, 0.237, 0.170 and 0.136 g,
1 mmol) were added to the similar hot solution (60 °C) of Schiff
base ligand (HL, 0.556 g, 2 mmol, 40 mL). The resulting mixture
was stirred under reflux for 2 h whereupon the complexes precip-
itated. They were collected by filtration, washed several times with
ethanol and diethyl ether, and dried in a desiccator over anhydrous
CaCl2 at room temperature.
345 nm is assigned to
p ?
p⁄ transition. Another band observed
at 362 nm is assigned to n ? p⁄ transition originating from the
amide or imine function of the Schiff base ligand [21].
The magnetic moment value (1.91 B.M.) for [CuL2] as well as the
broad band in its electronic spectrum centered at 805 and 977 nm,
assigned to 2B1g ? 2E1g and 2B1g ? 2A1g transitions suggested a
distorted octahedral geometry around the copper(II) ion [22].
However, the band observed at 368 nm was probably due to a
ligand-metal charge transfer transition.
[CoC32H32N6O4]: Yield (%): 70.72, reddish brown, M.pt: 175 °C,
M.Wt: 624, Anal. Calc. (%): Co, 9.45; C, 61.63; H, 5.17; N, 13.4.
Found (%): Co, 9.40; C, 61.58; H, 5.13; N, 13.41; IR (KBr,
m
cmꢁ1):
(CONH),
(ArAC@C),
(CoAN); UV–Vis (kmax
3254
1593
1309
m
m
m
(NH), 3069
(C@N), 1575
(CAO), 550–580
m
(ArACH), 2938
[(C@N)(pyridine)], 1535, 1455
(CoAO), 430–450
m(aliphatic-CH), 1645 m
The Ni(II) complex reported herein is high spin with a room
temperature magnetic moment value of 3.10 B.M. which is in the
normal range observed for octahedral Ni(II) complexes [22]. This
indicates that, the Ni(II) complex is probably octahedral [22,23].
The electronic spectrum of Ni(II) complex displayed three bands
at 446, 578 and 925 nm, assigned to 3A2g(F) ? 3T2g(F),
m
m
m
m
,
nm) (DMF): 347, 366, 464, 697 and 898; molar conductance
(DMF): 7.8 ohmꢁ1 cm2 molꢁ1
;
leff (B.M.): 3.65.
[NiC32H32N6O4]: Yield (%): 71.60, red, M.pt: 168 °C, M.Wt: 624,
Anal. Calc. (%): Ni, 9.41; C, 61.66; H, 5.17; N, 13.48. Found (%):
3
3A2g(F) ? 3T1g(F) and A2g(F) ? 3T1g(P) d–d transitions, respec-
Ni, 9.36; C, 61.55; H, 5.18; N, 13.44; IR (KBr,
(NH), 3056 (ArACH), 2975, 2920 (aliphatic-CH), 1643
(C@N), 1575 [(C@N)(pyridine)], 1546, 1455 (ArAC@C),
(CAO), 550–575 (NiAO), 440–460 (NiAN); UV–Vis (kmax
m
cmꢁ1): 3260
tively. The spectrum also showed a band at 368 nm, attributed to
ligand to metal charge transfer transition.
m
m
m
m(CONH),
1595
m
m
m
The measured magnetic moment value (3.65 B.M.) of the Co(II)
complex was lower than spin-only value (3.87 B.M.) and also lower
than the value reported for complex having octahedral geometry
[24]. The electronic spectrum of [CoL2] showed broad bands at
1310
m
m
m
,
nm) (DMF): 346, 368, 446, 578 and 925. molar conductance
(DMF): 5.5 ohmꢁ1 cm2 molꢁ1
;
leff (B.M.): 3.10.
[CuC32H32N6O4]: Yield (%): 71.33, dark brown, M.pt: 182 °C,
M.Wt: 628, Anal. Calc. (%): Cu, 10.11; C, 61.18; H, 5.13; N, 13.37.
4
464, 697 and 898 nm which are assigned to T1g(F) ? 4T2g(F),
4
4T1g(F) ? 4A2g(F) and T1g(F) ? 4T2g(P) transitions, respectively, in
Found (%): Cu, 10.07; C, 61.12; H, 5.07; N, 13.31; IR (KBr,
m
cmꢁ1): 3257
m
(NH), 3055
m
(ArACH), 2978, 2920
m
(aliphatic-CH),
[(C@N)(pyridine)], 1548,
(CuAO), 430–460
around the cobalt(II) ion. A moderately intense peak observed at
366 nm is also due to ligand to metal charge transfer transition.
The electronic spectrum of Zn(II) complex showed a band at
370 nm which is accounted for the ligand to metal charge transfer
transition.
1645
1458
m
m
(CONH), 1595
(ArAC@C), 1315
m
(C@N), 1575 m
m(CAO), 555–585
m
m
(CuAN); UV–Vis (kmax, nm) (DMF): 349, 368, 805 and 977; molar
conductance (DMF): 6.4 ohmꢁ1 cm2 molꢁ1
;
leff (B.M.): 1.91.
[ZnC32H32N6O4]: Yield (%): 70.51, yellow, M.pt: 186 °C, M.Wt:
630, Anal. Calc. (%): Zn, 10.37; C, 61.00; H, 5.11; N, 13.33. Found
(%): Zn, 10.35; C, 60.98; H, 5.13; N, 13.30; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, d,
ppm): 2.20 (s, 6H, aliphatic-CH3), 2.75 (s, 6H, aromati-CH3), 3.62
(s, 4H, CACH2AC), 6.85–7.82 (m, 14H, ArAH), 8.60 (s, 2H, CONH).
3.3. Molar conductivity
With a view to study the electrolytic nature of the mononuclear
metal complexes, their molar conductivities were measured in
DMF at 10ꢁ3 M. The molar conductivity values of all the complexes
are in the range 4.3–7.8 ohmꢁ1 cm2 molꢁ1 (shown in Table 1),
IR (KBr,
m
cmꢁ1): 3257
(CONH), 1597
m(NH), 3062
m(ArACH), 2984, 2925
m(ali-
phatic-CH), 1642
m
m(C@N), 1575 m[(C@N)(pyridine)],