glycerolphosphate building blocks could also be used in the
synthesis to allow the assembly of substituted TA fragments.
Employing the solid phase methodology, a small library of TA
fragments was generated which was tested for activity in
an opsonophagocytic inhibition assay, revealing a clear
TA-length–activity relationship. The assay also revealed
glucosyl substituted TA-hexamers 20 and 21 as promising lead
candidates for future vaccine development. We are currently
exploring the full scope of the method in the generation of a
larger library of TAs, bearing diverse substitution patterns to
unravel more detailed structure–activity relationships.
Notes and references
Fig. 1 Opsonophagocytic inhibition assay. a-LTA 12030 represents
the killing of the sera at 1 : 200 dilution. LTA is used as a positive
y The use of the commercially available N-MMT-6-aminohexanol
phosphoramidite led to the formation of N-cyanoethyl side products
in the cleavage/deprotection step. Although this could be prevented by
the use of 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT) in the cleavage cocktail, we prefer
the use of the stable benzyl carbamate 3.
control and is used at a concentration of 100 mg mLꢀ1
.
efficiency of the building blocks used. Notably, the benzylidene
functionality on the glucosyl moiety in 15 proved to be stable
to the repeated detritylation steps. Global deprotection of the
partially protected TA-fragments was achieved by hydrogenolysis
of the benzyl ethers, CBz-group and benzylidene functionality
over palladium black followed by desalination (Scheme 2),
uneventfully leading to TA-target structures 16–21, as
summarized in Table 1. The structure of the final products
was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and high resolution
mass spectrometry. In the NMR spectra the relative ratio of
the integrals of the peaks belonging to the spacer CH2 groups,
the spacer CH2–N group and the terminal glycerol CH2–O
moiety with respect to the bulk signal originating from all of
the other glycerol protons provided proof for the integrity of
the structures.
1 (a) W. Fischer, Adv. Microb. Physiol., 1988, 29, 233;
(b) F. C. Neuhaus and J. Baddiley, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
2003, 67, 686; (c) C. Weidenmaier and A. Peschel, Nat. Rev.
Microbiol., 2008, 6, 276; (d) I. B. Naumova, A. S. Shashkov,
E. M. Tul’skaya, G. M. Streshinskaya, Y. I. Kozlova,
N. V. Potekhina, L. I. Evtusshenko and E. Stackebrandt, FEMS
Microbiol. Rev., 2001, 25, 269.
2 (a) S. Morath, A. Geyer and T. Hartung, J. Exp. Med., 2001,
193, 393; (b) S. Morath, A. Geyer, I. Spreitzer, C. Hermann and
T. Hartung, Infect. Immun., 2002, 70, 938; (c) S. Morath, S. von
Aulock and T. Hartung, J. Endotoxin Res., 2005, 11, 348.
3 (a) S. von Aulock, T. Hartung and C. Hermann, J. Immunol., 2007,
178, 2610; (b) M. Hashimoto, M. Furuyashiki and Y. Suda,
J. Immunol., 2007, 178, 2610; (c) M. Hashimoto,
K. Tawaratsumida, H. Kariya, A. Kiyohara, Y. Suda, F. Krikae,
T. Kirikae and F. Gotz, J. Immunol., 2006, 177, 3162.
4 See for example: (a) A. Stadelmaier, S. Morath, T. Hartung and
R. R. Schmidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 916;
(b) I. Figueroa-Perez, A. Stadelmaier, S. Deininger, S. von Aulock,
T. Hartung and R. R. Schmidt, Carbohydr. Res., 2006, 341, 2901;
(c) I. Figueroa-Perez, A. Stadelmaier, S. Morath, T. Hartung and
R. R. Schmidt, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2005, 16, 493.
5 W. F. J. Hogendorf, L. J. van den Bos, H. S. Overkleeft,
´
J. D. C. Codee and G. A. van der Marel, Bioorg. Med. Chem.,
2010, 18, 3668.
6 I. G. Sava, E. Heikens and J. Huebner, Clin. Microbiol. Infect.,
2010, 16, 533.
7 (a) S. Koch, M. Hufnagel and J. Huebner, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther.,
2004, 4, 1519; (b) C. Theilacker, W. A. Krueger, A. Kropec and
J. Huebner, Vaccine, 2004, 22, S31.
8 S. L. Beaucage and M. H. Caruthers, Tetrahedron Lett., 1981,
22, 1859.
9 (a) C. B. Reese, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 3851;
(b) S. L. Beaucage, Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev., 2008,
11, 203; (c) S. L. Beaucage and R. P. Iyer, Tetrahedron, 1993,
49, 6123.
10 (a) D. Crich and W. Cai, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 4976;
(b) D. Crich and O. Vinogradova, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 8473;
(c) D. Crich, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 1144.
The prepared TA fragments were tested in an opsono-
phagocytic inhibition assay to establish their antigenic activity.13
In this assay, rabbit sera raised against purified E. faecalis
LTA are used to kill E. faecalis bacteria. Blocking the opsonic
antibodies in the sera with an inhibitor will lead to reduced
killing.z The inhibitory potential of the synthesized TA fragments
at a concentration of 100 mg mLꢀ1 is displayed in Fig. 1, which
shows that the smallest fragment tested, hexamer 16, is capable
of inhibiting the opsonophagocytic killing. For the 10-, 14-
and 20-mer a length-dependence is observed for the inhibitory
potential. The longer the fragments are the better the binding
is to the opsonic antibodies, resulting in reduced killing.
Interestingly, the glucose substituted TA fragments 20 and
21 were found to be very potent inhibitors. This is striking
since the a-glucosyl substituent is found in S. aureus TA, but
has not been found in E. faecalis TA. Nonetheless, compound
21 proved to be the most active compound of the series,
making this a promising candidate for the future development
of a vaccine comprising 21 or a close analogue as a synthetic
TA-antigen.
11 (a) J. D. C. Code
H. S. Overkleeft, J. H. van Boom and G. A. van der Marel, Org.
Lett., 2003, 5, 1947; (b) J. D. C. Codee, T. J. Boltje and G. A. van
´
e, L. J. van den Bos, R. E. J. N. Litjens,
´
der Marel, Carbohydrate Chemistry: Proven Methods, 2011, vol. 1,
ch 6, p. 67.
We have described the development of automated solid phase
methodology to synthesize glycerol phosphate teichoic acid
fragments. Tailor made glycerol phosphoramidite building
blocks were used in combination with a commercially available
synthesizer, to produce partially protected TA fragments.
With a full coupling cycle, taking approximately 15 minutes,
a TA 20-mer was produced in 5 hours. Functionalized
12 R. Weltz and S. Muller, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 795.
13 (a) C. Theilacker, Z. Kaczynski, A. Kropec, F. Fabretti, T. Sange,
O. Holst and J. Huebner, Infect. Immun., 2006, 74, 5703;
(b) C. Theilacker, A. Kropec, O. Holst and J. Huebner, Int. J.
Med. Microbiol., 2006, 296, 97; (c) I. Toma, C. Theilacker, I. Sava,
A. Kropec, F. Hammer and J. Huebner, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents,
2007, 29, S512.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8961–8963 8963