Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
BRIEF ARTICLE
heme. In this conformation one of the fluorine atoms makes an
unfavorable intramolecular contact with the chlorine atom on the
phenyl ring. However, there is no electron density indicating an
altered orientation for the CF2 group that avoids this unfavorable
contact. This steric hindrance may partially account for the 2-fold
drop in potency for 8b compared to 8a. When both meta positions of
the phenyl ring are substituted (8d), the conformation of the phenyl
ring is determined by the bulkier chlorine atom and the conformation
is more like 8a than 1b. This ring is still well tolerated in the active site,
and of the CF2 analogues reported here (1a,b, 8a,b, 8d,e), 8d is the
most potent of the series. Interestingly, the side chain of 8d shows
only one conformation because the meta disubstituted ring is too
large to be accommodated in the alternative conformation. Inhibitor
8e is the least potent analogue of the series. Similar to 8b, ortho
substitution in 8e leads to an intramolecular clash between fluorine of
the ring and the CF2 group, and again, only one side chain
conformation is observed with CF2 pointing downward to the heme
(Figure 1B,F).
Inhibitor 8c, a mixture of diastereomers, is the monofluoro
methylene derivative of 1b with a chiral pyrrolidine core. The mixture
shows increased potency for rat nNOS (8c vs 1b, Table 1). This may
result from the higher basicity of the amino group in the lipophilic tail
of 8c compared to that of 1b.8 However, the nNOS selectivity of 8c
over eNOS is somewhat diminished compared with that for 1b
because of its relatively higher potency toward eNOS. The structures
of 8c bound to nNOS and eNOS were obtained (Figure 1C,D). In
both structures, the same binding mode for 8c is observed, with its
single fluorine atom pointing down toward the heme. Apparently,
despite being a mixture of diastereomers, the (R,R,R)-diastereomer
has greater binding affinity to the isozymes than the (R,R,S)-diaster-
eomer because the observed electron density for the fluorine atom only
supports one position (R). This may be because there is no unfavorable
contact between this fluorine atom and heme propionate A in con-
trast to the clashes observed for the CF2 group in its “downward”
conformation in the nNOS-8a structure (Figure 1A). The amino group
in the lipophilic tail of the inhibitor lures Glu592 of nNOS (Glu363 of
eNOS) into an alternative rotamer by hydrogen bonding.
’ EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
The purity of the final compounds was determined by HPLC analysis
to be g95%. For experimental details, see the Supporting Information.
6-(((3R,4R)-4-(2-((2,2-Difluoro-2-(3-fluorophenyl)ethyl)-
amino)ethoxy)pyrrolidin-3-yl)methyl)-4-methylpyridin-2-
amine (1b). To a solution of 12a (60 mg, 85 umol) in MeOH (2mL) was
added 6 N HCl (4 mL) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for
12 h and then concentrated. The crude product was purified by recrystalli-
zation (EtOH/H2O) to give inhibitor 1b (40 mg, 99%) as a tri-HCl salt;
[R]20 +6.25 (c 4, MeOH).
6-(((3R,4R)-4-(2-((2,2-Difluoro-2-(3-chlorophenyl)ethyl)-
amino)ethoxy)pyrrolidin-3-yl)methyl)-4-methylpyridin-2-
amine (8a). To a solution of 12b (70 mg, 0.10 mmol) in MeOH
(2 mL) was added 6 N HCl (4 mL) at room temperature. The mixture
was stirred for 12 h and then concentrated. The crude product was
purified by recrystallization (EtOH/H2O) to give inhibitor 8a (50 mg,
1
95%) as a tri-HCl salt: H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 2.19 (s, 3H),
2.60À2.75 (m, 1H), 2.85À2.95 (m, 1H), 3.00À3.10 (m, 2H),
3.20À3.30 (m, 1H), 3.30À3.45 (m, 3H), 3.55À3.60 (d, J = 13.0 Hz,
1H), 3.65À3.70 (m, 1H), 3.75À3.90 (m, 3H), 4.15 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H),
6.41 (s, 1H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 7.30À7.45 (m, 3H), 7.52 (s, 1H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, D2O) δ 20.0, 29.2, 41.3, 41.4, 47.0, 47.4, 49.1, 51.7, 63.6,
78.3, 110.4, 114.0, 118.2, 123.39, 123.42, 123.47, 125.07, 125.12,
130.7, 131.5, 133.9, 134.4, 145.4, 153.9, 158.1; LC-TOF (M + H+)
calcd for C21H28ClF2N4O 425.1920, found 425.1919.
6-(((3R,4R)-4-(2-((2,2-Difluoro-2-(2-chlorophenyl)ethyl)-
amino)ethoxy)pyrrolidin-3-yl)methyl)-4-methylpyridin-2-
amine (8b). Inhibitor 8b was synthesized using a procedure similar
to that for 8a (50 mg, 95%) as a tri-HCl salt: 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ
2.19 (s, 3H), 2.60À2.75 (m, 1H), 2.85À2.95 (m, 1H), 3.03À3.08 (t, J =
11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (s, 1H), 3.21À3.25 (dd, J = 3.0, 13.0 Hz, 1H),
3.35À3.42 (m, 3H), 3.52À3.58 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 3.63À3.66 (m,
1H), 3.82À3.88 (m, 1H), 3.90À4.00 (m, 2H), 4.14À4.16 (t, J = 3.5 Hz,
1H), 6.42 (s, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 7.30À7.35 (m, 1H), 7.40À7.45 (m, 2H),
7.55À7.60 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ 21.0, 29.0, 41.2, 47.0,
47.4, 48.8, 49.2, 50.3, 50.5, 63.4, 78.2, 110.4, 113.9, 118.1, 127.57, 127.63,
127.70, 129.1, 130.8, 131.4, 131.5, 133.1, 145.5, 153.9, 158.1; LC-TOF
(M + H+) calcd for C21H28ClF2N4O 425.1920, found 425.1919.
6-(((3R,4R)-4-(2-((2-Fluoro-2-(3-fluorophenyl)ethyl)amino)-
ethoxy)pyrrolidin-3-yl)methyl)-4-methylpyridin-2-amine (8c).
Inhibitor 8c was synthesized as a mixture of two diastereomers using a
procedure similar to that for 8a (32 mg, 90%) as a tri-HCl salt: 1H NMR
(500 MHz, D2O) δ 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.65À2.75 (m, 1H), 2.85À2.95 (m, 1H),
3.03À3.11 (m, 1H), 3.20 (s, 1H), 3.21À3.25 (dd, J = 3.0, 13.0 Hz, 1H),
3.30À3.45 (m, 4H), 3.50À3.58 (m, 2H), 3.60À3.66 (m, 1H), 3.80À3.85
(m, 1H), 4.14À4.16 (m, 1H), 5.80À6.00 (m, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H),
6.50À6.55 (m, 1H), 7.00À7.15 (m, 3H), 7.30À7.41 (m, 1H);
13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ 21.0, 29.0, 29.1, 41.3, 41.4, 43.7, 43.9,
47.0, 47.1, 47.3, 48.7, 49.2, 49.3, 51.3, 51.5, 51.7, 51.8, 63.6, 63.9, 78.2, 88.4,
89.8, 110.4, 112.48, 112.54, 112.56, 112.61, 112.69, 112.72, 112.74, 114.0,
114.1, 116.3, 116.5, 116.6, 121.35, 121.40, 121.46, 121.49, 121.51, 130.85,
130.92, 131.0, 136.8, 136.99, 137.02, 145.60, 145.64, 153.85, 153.86,
158.11, 158.12, 161.6, 163.5; LC-TOF (M + H+) calcd for C21H29F2N4O
391.2309, found 391.2288.
6-(((3R,4R)-4-(2-((2,2-Difluoro-2-(3-chloro-5-fluorophenyl)-
ethyl)amino)ethoxy)pyrrolidin-3-yl)methyl)-4-methylpyridin-
2-amine (8d). Inhibitor 8d was synthesized as a mixture of two dia-
stereomers using a procedure similar to that for 8a (7 mg, 80%) as a tri-HCl
salt: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.80À2.87 (m, 1H),
2.93À2.98 (m, 1H), 3.07À3.13 (m, 1H), 3.23À3.27 (m, 1H), 3.38À3.45
(m, 1H), 3.51À3.56 (m, 2H), 3.50À3.58 (m, 2H), 3.65À3.68 (d, J = 13.0
Hz, 1H), 3.73À3.79 (m, 2H), 3.94À3.99 (m, 1H), 4.00À4.07 (m, 1H),
4.19À4.21 (m, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 7.42À7.46 (m, 2H), 7.56
(s, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, MeOD) δ 22.0, 30.4, 43.5, 52.5, 52.7, 64.9,
StructureÀactivity relationship (SAR) studies demonstrate
the key role of the meta substituent in 1b, 8c, and 8d for retaining
high inhibitory activity for rat nNOS. A bulkier m-chloro group in 8a
increases potency relative to the m-fluoro substituent but leads to a
loss in selectivity over the other two isoforms. Although m-chloro
and m-fluoro disubstitution (8d) achieves another small boost in
potency, it also results in an additional drop in selectivity. The
o-chloro group in 8b or o-fluoro group in 8e leads to tight intra-
molecular contacts with its CF2 group, which is accompanied by an
unfavorable side chain conformation and a drop in potency. The
p-fluoro in 1a forces its CF2 group into a downward conformation,
weakening the hydrogen bond from the amino group to the Glu592
side chain. It seems then that only meta substituents place the
phenyl ring in the right position to optimize van der Waals contact
with the hydrophobic pocket surrounded by Val567 and Phe584 in
nNOS,7 and m-fluoro inhibitor 1b achieves the optimum balance
between potency and selectivity.
’ CONCLUSION
An improved synthesis of chiral pyrrolidine inhibitors of nNOS
has been developed. Compared with the reported synthesis, it is
three steps shorter with an overall yield of ∼10% (>10-fold larger). It
also enables expanded SAR studies on the pyrrolidine-based scaffold,
which can be beneficial for further development of nNOS inhibitors.
6402
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm200411j |J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 6399–6403