Mechanistic investigation of the enantioselective intramolecular stetter reaction: Proton transfer is the first irreversible step

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/ol200256a

A study on the mechanism of the asymmetric intramolecular Stetter reaction is reported. This investigation includes the determination of the rate law, kinetic isotope effects, and competition experiments. The reaction was found to be first order in aldehy

Full text of DOI:10.1021/ol200256a

ORGANIC
LETTERS
2011
Vol. 13, No. 7
1742–1745
Mechanistic Investigation of the
Enantioselective Intramolecular Stetter
Reaction: Proton Transfer Is the First
Irreversible Step
Jennifer L. Moore,† Anthony P. Silvestri, Javier Read de Alaniz,‡ Daniel A. DiRocco,
and Tomislav Rovis*
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523,
United States
rovis@lamar.colostate.edu
Received January 27, 2011
ABSTRACT
A study on the mechanism of the asymmetric intramolecular Stetter reaction is reported. This investigation includes the determination of the rate
law, kinetic isotope effects, and competition experiments. The reaction was found to be first order in aldehyde and azolium catalyst or free
carbene. A primary kinetic isotope effect was found for the proton of the aldehyde. Taken together with a series of competition experiments, these
results suggest that proton transfer from the tetrahedral intermediate formed upon nucleophilic attack of the carbene onto the aldehyde is the first
irreversible step.
The seminal example of the reversal of functional group
€
aliphatic aldehydes are competent nucleophilic coupling
partners with a wide range of R,β-unsaturated ketones,
esters, and nitriles.6 The ability to bring two different
electrophilic partners together and form a new car-
bon-carbon bond enhances the potential utility of this
transformation.
Our group has developed chiral triazolinylidene car-
benes and precursors, 1-3 (Figure 1), for a variety of
carbene-mediated transformations.2a,b We have shown
that the carbenes derived from 1 and 2 are capable of
inducing the cyclization of aromatic and aliphatic alde-
hydes to R,β-unsaturated esters, ketones, thioesters,
amides, aldehydes, and nitriles.7 More recently, we
have extended this reaction to preliminary reports of
polarity, the benzoin reaction, dates to 1832, when Wohler
and Liebig reported that cyanide catalyzes the formation
of benzoin from 2 equiv of benzaldehyde.1,2 In 1943, Ukai
et al. showed that thiazolium salts catalyze the homodi-
merization of aldehydes in the presence of base.3 A related
Umpolung4 transformation is the Stetter reaction, the
conjugate addition of the aldehyde into a Michael
acceptor.5 Utilizing thiazolylidene carbenes as catalysts,
Stetter demonstrated that a variety of aromatic and
† Current address: Natural Science Division, Pepperdine University,
Malibu, CA.
‡ Current address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University
of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
(1) Woehler, F.; Liebig, J. Ann. Pharm. 1903, 3, 249.
(2) For reviews, see: (a) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem.
2009, 290, 77. (b) Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. Synlett 2009, 8, 1189.
(c) Enders, D.; Niemeier, O.; Henseler, A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5606.
(3) Ukai, T.; Tanaka, R.; Dokawa, T. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1943, 63,
296.
(6) Stetter, H.; Kuhlmann, H. Org. React. 1991, 40, 407.
(7) (a) Kerr, M. S.; Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 10298. (b) Kerr, M. S.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
8876. (c) Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6284.
(d) Liu, Q.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2552. (e) Read de
Alaniz, J.; Kerr, M. S.; Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
2033.
(4) Seebach, D. Angew. Chem. 1979, 91, 259.
(5) Stetter, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 639.
r
10.1021/ol200256a
Published on Web 02/28/2011
2011 American Chemical Society

Scheme 1. Proposed General Mechanism for the Stetter Reac-
tion
Figure 1. Catalysts used in the Stetter reaction.
asymmetric intermolecular reactions.8,9 Nevertheless, lim-
itations remain.
Mechanistic insight into organocatalytic reactions is
important for the development of general transforma-
tions.10 To the best of our knowledge a detailed study
probing the mechanism of the Stetter reaction has not been
reported. In the absence of such a study the working model
of the Stetter reaction is based on the Breslow mechanism
for the thiamin-catalyzed benzoin reaction.11,12 The
mechanism is closely related to Lapworth’s mechanism for
cyanide anion catalyzed benzoin reaction.13 As with the
cyanide-catalyzed benzoin reaction, the thiazolinylidene-
catalyzed reaction is reversible.14
The proposed catalytic cycle is as follows: the carbene I
(Scheme 1), formed in situ by base deprotonation of the
corresponding azolium salt, adds to the aldehyde to form
II. A proton transfer event generates acyl anion equivalent
III, termed the nucleophilic alkene or Breslow intermedi-
ate. Subsequent addition intothe Michael acceptorforms a
new carbon-carbon bond togenerateIV. A secondproton
transfer event then provides V. Finally, collapse of this
tetrahedral intermediate V to form a Stetter product is
accompanied by liberation of the active catalyst. As we
strive to understand differences in catalysts and continue
to work toward the development of the enantioselective
intermolecular reactions, we believe that the results from a
detailed mechanistic study may provide insight toward the
rational attainmentof these goals. Hereinwereportaseries
of mechanistic experiments that shed light on the nuances
that govern reactivity in the intramolecular Stetter
reaction.
(8) (a) Liu, Q.; Perreault, S.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
14066. (b) Liu, Q.; Rovis, T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2856. (c) DiRocco,
D. A.; Dalton, D. M.; Oberg, K. M.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 10872.
(9) Contributions from others: (a) Enders, D.; Han, J.; Henseler, A.
Chem. Commun. 2008, 3989. (b) Enders, D.; Han, J. Synthesis 2008,
3864. (c) Jousseaume, T.; Wurz, N. E.; Glorius, F. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 1410. (d) For an enzyme-catalyzed asymmetric Stetter, see:
€
€
Dresen, C.; Richter, M.; Pohl, M.; Ludeke, S.; Muller, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6600.
(10) (a) Kunz, R. K.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
ꢀ
127, 3240. (b) Franzen, J.; Marigo, M.; Fielenback, D.; Wabnitz, T. C.;
Kjærsgaard, A.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 18296. (c)
Halland, N.; Lie, M. A.; Kjærsgaard, A.; Marigo, M.; Schiøtt, B.;
Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 7083. (d) Grossman, R. B.;
Comesse, S.; Rasne, R. M.; Hattori, K.; Delong, M. N. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 871. (e) Lemay, M.; Ogilvie, W. W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4141. (f)
Armstrong, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1460. (g) Bulman Page,
P. C.; Barros, D.; Buckley, B. R.; Marples, B. A. Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 2005, 16, 3488.
(11) (a) Breslow, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3719. (b) Knight,
R. L.; Leeper, F. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3611. (c) Knight, R. L.;
Leeper, F. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1891. (d) Dudding, T;
Houk, K. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5770. (d) Sheehan,
J. C.; Hunneman, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3666. (e) White,
M. J.; Leeper, F. J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5124. (f) Mahathananchai, J.;
Zheng, P.; Bode, J. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1673.
(12) Lopez-Calahorra and co-workers proposed an alternative me-
chanism involving thiazolium dimer VI with the reaction occurring
through nucleophilic attack of this species on benzaldehyde to yield
VII, followed by formation of intermediate type VIII, lacking stabiliza-
tion of the carbanion. See, for example: Lopez-Calahorra, F.; Rubires,
R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9713. For a counterpoint, see: Breslow, R.;
Schmuck, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8241.
As salicylaldehyde derived aldehyde 4 is used as a bench-
mark to measure the efficiency and selectivity of newly
developed catalysts for the Stetter reaction, it was chosen
as the substrate for this study, eq 1. Under standard
reaction conditions, aldehyde 4 is subjected to 20 mol %
2aand 20mol % KHMDS in toluene (0.025M) at0 °C; the
observed rate of the reaction is 2.65 ꢀ 10-3 M-1 s-1. Gas
chromatography was utilized for the analysis of cyclized
product 5 by using 4,40-di-tert-butyl biphenyl (DBB) as an
internal standard (tR 4.8 min) and monitoring the disap-
pearance of aldehyde 4 (tR 2.0 min) and concurrent
(13) Lapworth, A. J. Chem. Soc. 1903, 83, 995.
(14) Buck, J. S.; Ide, W. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1931, 53, 2350.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1743

appearance of keto-ester 5 (tR 2.9 min). Standard kinetic
analysis using the conversion of aldehyde 4 to keto-ester 5
exhibits a first order dependence as a function of aldehyde
concentration versus time over four half-lives.15
The catalyst dependence was found to be first order,
determined by varying the concentration of catalyst from
0.0025 to 0.0100 M. These experiments establish a second
order rate law (eq 1).16
The 2H kinetic isotope effect (KIE) study was conducted
under standard reaction conditions with 4 and its deuter-
ated isotopologue (ArCDO), and the kH/kD was found to
be 2.62 (Scheme 2). These experiments suggest that proton
transfer is turnover limitting.
the reaction. A more electron-deficient aldehyde is con-
sumed ∼10.1 times faster than the parent substrate 4
(Scheme 3a). Conversely, the more electron-rich sub-
strate 10 proved more sluggish than 4 providing a k4/k10
of ∼7.7.
Scheme 3. Aldehyde Competition Experiments
Scheme 2. Kinetic Isotope Effect Studies
The above observations are all consistent with the initial
proton transfer (II to III, Scheme 1) being the first irrever-
sible step.17 The more electron-deficient substrate 8 bears a
methine of increased acidity relative to the parent sub-
strate. Similarly, substrate 10 bearing the electron-releas-
ing para-methoxy group thus has a less acidic methine in
its corresponding intermediate II, leading to a slower
reaction.
What remains is to determine the mechanism of the
proton transfer. A direct 1,2-proton shift is symmetry
forbidden and unlikely to occur.18 In a DFT study of a
model Stetter reaction mechanism, Yates has suggested
that the proton transfer event must proceed intermolecu-
larly, most likely via a second zwitterionic intermediate
(similar to II, Scheme 1).19 However, if this were the
mechanism for the proton transfer in our reaction, kinetics
should be second order in catalyst and substrate. We have
further found that the reaction involving the free carbene
In order to shed further light onto the mechanism, we
conducted a series of competition experiments. We rea-
soned that the sterics and electronics of the Michael
acceptor should have a profound role on the reaction if
the first irreversible step is the second proton transfer event
(IV to V) but a negligible role if it is the first (II to III,
Scheme 1). Equimolar amounts of aldehydes 4 and 6 were
subjected to the reaction in the presence of an internal
standard (DBB), and the reaction was monitored by GC.
We found that the two substrates are consumed at nearly
the same rate (krel = 1.25, k4/k6, eq 2). This result suggests
that the initial proton transfer is the first irreversible step.
(17) This is consistent with Berkessel’s observation that the catalyst
resting state in the triazolylidene-catalyzed benzoin in THF is a dioxo-
lane resulting from the tetrahedral alkoxy intermediate analogous to II
adding another molecule of aldehyde in a reversible process. Thus, if
proton transfer to generate III is slow, the alkoxide would prefer adding
to an aldehyde to avoid the charge on oxygen in the absence of solvation.
See: Berkessel, A.; Elfert, S.; Etzenbach-Effers, K.; Teles, J. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7120.
(18) A 1,2-proton shift is a symmetry forbidden transformation
(Kemp, D. S. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 202 and references therein) but
has been calculated to have an ∼29 kcal/mol barrier (thiazolylidine) and
∼51 kcal/mol barrier (cyanide) in the formation of the acyl anion
equivalent from formaldehyde. See:Goldfuss, B.; Schumacher, M. J.
Mol. Model. 2006, 12, 591.
We further conducted a series of competition experi-
ments to investigate the role of aldehyde electronics on
(15) See Supporting Information for the details of the kinetic experi-
ments and the corresponding graphs.
(16) The same kinetic analysis was conducted on catalyst 3a showing
little difference in the corresponding catalytic cycle.
(19) Hawkes, K. J.; Yates, B. F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 5563.
1744
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011

3a is similar in all respects to the 2a/KHMDS system
suggesting HMDSand KBF4 play no rolein the reaction.20
XI, analogous to the nucleophilic alkene III in Scheme 1.
As a test of this hypothesis, we conducted a competition
experiment between ether-linked aldehyde 4 and substrate
12 bearing a methylene linker. Experiments shown in
Scheme 3 suggest that the more electrophilic substrate 12
(bearing the more acidic methine; contrast 4 and 10,
Scheme 3b) should be consumed faster if the oxygen linker
has no role in the mechanism. We found that the oxygen-
linked substrate 4 is consumed in high preference over the
methylene-linked substrate 12 implicating the oxygen in
the proton transfer event.21
Scheme 4. Probing the Mechanism of the 1,2-Proton Shift
Scheme 5. Competition Experiment
The most likely scenario that remains is that there is an
agent of proton transfer within the molecule, on either the
catalyst or the substrate. We envisioned two scenarios, one
involving the ethereal oxygen linking the aldehyde and
Michael acceptor and the second involving the aryl ring on
the azolium precatalyst (Scheme 4). As a test of the latter
hypothesis, we note that subjection of deuteroaldehyde
4-D to a N-phenyl triazolium precatalyst under typical
reaction conditions results in no observed deuteration in
the catalyst architecture. A kinetic isotope effect should
result in some deuteration of the ortho position on the
catalyst aryl ring (compare XIII in Scheme 4, H vs D). The
potential role of substrate in accelerating the proton
transfer event was also evaluated. One can imagine that
the proximity of the ether linker leads to deprotonation of
the methine and generation of the derived oxonium (X in
Scheme 4). This intermediate is presumably very short-
lived, undergoing abstraction by the alkoxide generating
In summary, we have provided convincing evidence that
proton transfer is the first irreversible step in the triazoli-
nylidine carbene-catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular
Stetter reaction. This finding will have an impact on the
design of future catalysts for the Stetter reaction. Further-
more, given the importance of generating the enolamine or
nucleophilic alkene in other NHC-catalyzed reactions of
aldehydes, this mechanistic nuance should also have a
bearing on those areas.
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Science
Foundation and NIGMS (GM72586) for support and
Roche and Amgen for unrestricted support. J.R. and J.
L.M. thank the National Institutes of Health (Ruth L.
Kirschstein Minority Predoctoral fellowship). J.R. also
thanks Colorado PEAKS AGEP (graduate fellowship).
We thank Profs. Jeffrey B. Johnson (Hope College) and
Daniel A. Singleton (Texas A&M) for many helpful
discussions.
(20) The protocol for generating the free carbene 3a involves removal
of volatiles including HMDS. Added HMDS did not appreciably affect
the rate of the reaction. Separation of the insoluble KBF4 shows no
appreciable differences in reactivity. Furthermore, in situ 19F NMR of
the reaction medium shows no fluorine signals suggesting KBF4 is
completely insoluble under these conditions.
(21) That substrate 12 still undergoes reaction means that there must
be another mechanism available for proton transfer, presumably either
via Hypothesis II above or involving another molecule of catalyst or
intermediate, as argued by Yates (see ref 19).
Supporting Information Available. Experimental pro-
cedures, kinetic and competition experiment data are
provided. This material is available free of charge via
the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1745