∼40 Hz (38 Hz in 6) and around 80 Hz in the [5(S),S(R)]
epimers.7 This correlation will be determinant in the final
comparison with natural (-)-Centrolobine.
Scheme 2
Without protection of the hydroxyl group, the methyl ester
6 was transformed into the N-methyl-N-methoxyamide
(Weinreb amide)8 7 in 93% yield. The hydroxyketone 3 was
then obtained in 71% yield by addition of p-methoxy-
phenylmagnesium bromide reagent to the Weinreb amide 7.
With the hydroxyketone 3 in hand, we tried the cyclization
under catalytic acid conditions (p-toluenesulfonic acid9 or
camphorsulfonic acid10) and obtained 50% of the starting
hydroxyketone 3 and 50% of the dihydropyran 8 (Scheme
3). In these acidic conditions, it was impossible to isolate
Scheme 3
the intermediate hemiketal 9, which was dehydrated quickly
to the very stable and highly conjugate dihydropyran 8. It
was not possible to improve the yield.
Following the work of Olah11 and Nicolaou12 who
described the trimethylsilyl triflate catalyzed preparation of
unsymmetrical ethers by reductive condensation of carbonyl
compounds with alkoxysilanes, we treated the hydroxyketone
3 with an excess of Et3SiH and TMSOTf in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C.
After 15 min, we obtained in good yield (81%) the
tetrahydropyran 10 with complete syn stereoselectivity
(Scheme 4). The syn stereochemistry of 10 was assigned by
cation procedure. According to our previous results,5 the
reduction of the â-ketosulfoxide 4 with DIBAL/ZnBr2
yielded [5(R),S(R)]-â-hydroxysulfoxide 6 in 80% yield and
98% de. The (R) configuration of the hydroxylic carbon was
expected from the reaction mechanism already proposed5d
and also from our 1H NMR characterization of the product.
From the numerous examples of reduction of â-ketosulfox-
ides already reported,5b,c,f,6 we noticed that the nonequiva-
lence of the methylene hydrogens R to the sulfoxide group
is quite different in the two diastereomers: in the [5(R),S(R)]
configuration, the ∆ν value between these two hydrogens is
Scheme 4
(3) Solladie´, G.; Hutt, J.; Girardin, A. Synthesis 1987, 173.
(4) Solladie´, G.; Maestro, M. C.; Rubio, A.; Pedregal, C.; Carren˜o M.
C.; Garcia-Ruano, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2317.
(5) (a) Solladie´, G.; Demailly, G.; Greck, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985,
26, 435. (b) Solladie´, G.; Demailly, Greck, C. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
1552. (c) Solladie´, G.; Frechou, C.; Demailly, G.; Greck, C. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 1912. (d) Solladie´-Cavallo, A.; Suffert, J.; Adib, A.; Solladie´, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6649. (e) Solladie´, G.; Rubio, A.; Carren˜o M.
C.; Garcia-Ruano, J. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1990, 1, 187. (f) Carren˜o,
M. C.; Garcia Ruano, J. L.; Martin, A.; Pedregal, C.; Rodriguez, J. H.;
Rubio, A.; Sanchez, J.; Solladie´, G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2120
(6) (a) Solladie´, G.; Huser, N . Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1995, 114,
153. (b) Solladie´, G.; Carren˜o, M. C. In Organosulfur Chemistry: Synthetic
Aspects; Page, P. C. B., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1995; p 1. (c)
Carren˜o, M. C. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1717.
1H NMR spectroscopy on the basis of NOESY experiments.
The configuration at the new stereogenic center must be
(7) Solladie´, G.; Huser, N.; Garc´ıa Ruano, J. L.; Adrio, J.; Carren˜o, M.
C.; Tito, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5297.
(8) Boukouvalas, J.; Fortier, G.; Radu, I. I. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 916.
1724
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 10, 2002