Inhibition of glcnac-processing glycosidases by c-6-Azido-nag-thiazoline and its derivatives

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules19033471

NAG-thiazoline is a strong competitive inhibitor of GH20 β-N-Acetylhexosaminidases and GH84 β-N-Acetylglucosaminidases. Here, we focused on the design, synthesis and inhibition potency of a series of new derivatives of NAG-thiazoline modified at the C-6 position. Dimerization of NAG-thiazoline via C-6 attached triazole linkers prepared by click chemistry was employed to make use of multivalency in the inhibition. Novel compounds were tested as potential inhibitors of β-N-Acetylhexosaminidases from Talaromyces flavus, Streptomyces plicatus (both GH20) and β-N- Acetylglucosaminidases from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and humans (both GH84). From the set of newly prepared NAG-thiazoline derivatives, only C-6-Azido-NAG-thiazoline displayed inhibition activity towards these enzymes; C-6 triazole-substituted NAG-thiazolines lacked inhibition activity against the enzymes used. Docking of C-6-Azido-NAG-thiazoline into the active site of the tested enzymes was performed. Moreover, a stability study with GlcNActhiazoline confirmed its decomposition at pH < 6 yielding 2-Acetamido-2-deoxy-1-thio-A/ β- D-glucopyranoses, which presumably dimerize oxidatively into S-S linked dimers; decomposition products of NAG-thiazoline are void of inhibitory activity.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules19033471

Molecules 2014, 19, 3471-3488; doi:10.3390/molecules19033471
OPEN ACCESS
molecules
ISSN 1420-3049
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Article
Inhibition of GlcNAc-Processing Glycosidases by
C-6-Azido-NAG-Thiazoline and Its Derivatives
Jana Krejzová 1,2,†, Petr Šimon 1,3,†, Lubica Kalachova 1, Natallia Kulik 4, Pavla Bojarová 1,
Petr Marhol 1, Helena Pelantová 1, Josef Cvačka 5, Rüdiger Ettrich 4, Kristýna Slámová 1,*
and Vladimír Křen 1
1
Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083,
14220 Praha 4, Czech Republic; E-Mails: hoficek@centrum.cz (J.K.); shimon@seznam.cz (P.Š.);
kalachova@biomed.cas.cz (L.K.); fialovap@email.cz (P.B.); rtepm@seznam.cz (P.M.);
pelantova@biomed.cas.cz (H.P.); kren@biomed.cas.cz (V.K.)
2
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague,
Technická 5, 16628 Praha 6, Czech Republic
3
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
Flemingovo nám. 2, 16610 Praha 6, Czech Republic
4
Department of Structure and Function of Proteins, Institute of Nanobiology and Structural Biology
of GCRC, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 136, 37333 Nové Hrady,
Czech Republic; E-Mails: kulik@nh.cas.cz (N.K.); ettrich@nh.cas.cz (R.E.)
5
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
Flemingovo nám. 2, 16610 Praha 6, Czech Republic; E-Mail: cvacka@uochb.cas.cz
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: slamova.kristyna@gmail.com;
Tel.: +420-296-442-766; Fax: +420-296-442-509.
Received: 4 February 2014; in revised form: 6 March 2014 / Accepted: 13 March 2014 /
Published: 20 March 2014
Abstract: NAG-thiazoline is a strong competitive inhibitor of GH20 β-N-acetyl-
hexosaminidases and GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases. Here, we focused on the design,
synthesis and inhibition potency of a series of new derivatives of NAG-thiazoline modified
at the C-6 position. Dimerization of NAG-thiazoline via C-6 attached triazole linkers
prepared by click chemistry was employed to make use of multivalency in the inhibition.
Novel compounds were tested as potential inhibitors of β-N-acetylhexosaminidases from
Talaromyces flavus, Streptomyces plicatus (both GH20) and β-N-acetylglucosaminidases

Molecules 2014, 19
from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and humans (both GH84). From the set of newly
3472
prepared NAG-thiazoline derivatives, only C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline displayed inhibition
activity towards these enzymes; C-6 triazole-substituted NAG-thiazolines lacked inhibition
activity against the enzymes used. Docking of C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline into the active
site of the tested enzymes was performed. Moreover, a stability study with GlcNAc-
thiazoline confirmed its decomposition at pH < 6 yielding 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-1-thio-α/β-
D-glucopyranoses, which presumably dimerize oxidatively into S-S linked dimers;
decomposition products of NAG-thiazoline are void of inhibitory activity.
Keywords: NAG-thiazoline; enzyme inhibition; O-GlcNAcase; click chemistry; azide;
β-N-acetylhexosaminidase
1. Introduction
NAG-thiazoline (2'-methyl-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-α-D-glucopyranosyl-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline, 1) [1]
is generally recognized as a strong competitive inhibitor of GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases and
GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (O-GlcNAcases) [2] based on mimicking of the oxazoline
transition state during the hydrolytic cleavage of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) moiety from various
substrates. Small molecule inhibitors of β-N-acetylhexosaminidases are very helpful tools in the
studies of their physiological effects in vivo. However, only in case they are highly selective for just
one of these enzyme groups, false observations caused by undesired inhibition of all functionally
related enzymes may be avoided. Understanding the mechanism and localization of these structurally
and functionally related glycosidases can help in diagnosis and treatment of serious neurodegenerative
disorders such as Alzheimer’s, Tay-Sachs’ or Sandhoff’s diseases [3,4].
A kinetic study with NAG-thiazoline and a series of its derivatives with extended N-acyl moieties
demonstrated that both types of human β-N-acetylhexosaminidases (GH20 and 84) are inhibited by
thiazoline 1 in a very similar way (KI 70 nM), while the N-acyl-modified analogues of 1 are generally
weaker inhibitors displaying high selectivity towards O-GlcNAcase [5]. Several more series of various
derivatives based on the NAG-thiazoline scaffold have been introduced, e.g., a set of NAG-thiazolines
bearing substituents of the thiazoline ring [6], C-1 homologated thiazolines [7], and a series of
C-6-acylated analogues of NAG-thiazoline [8]; however, none of those derivatives ever reached the
inhibition potency of the parent compound 1. Detailed kinetic and structural studies of O-GlcNAcases
have enabled the design of the so far most potent and selective NAG-thiazoline-based inhibitor of
human O-GlcNAcase called thiamet-G, which displays a 37,000-fold higher selectivity for
O-GlcNAcase (KI 21 nM) over lysosomal β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (KI 750 μM). This inhibitor has
proved its selective effect in vivo and is currently tested as a potential Alzheimer’s therapeutics
blocking pathogenic hyperphosphorylation of protein tau [3,9].
In the present work we focused on the design, synthesis and inhibition potency of a series of new
derivatives of NAG-thiazoline (1) modified at the C-6 position of the pyranose ring first with the
azido-group (2), which was consequently transformed into substituted triazole-derivatives using click
chemistry (3–8). Moreover, two triazole-derivatives were dimers, aiming at a possible multivalency

Molecules 2014, 19
3473
effect in enzyme inhibition (9,10). Two GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases and two GH84
β-N-acetylglucosaminidases were used as representatives of these glycosidase families in inhibition
assays with the prepared NAG-thiazoline derivatives. The results of the inhibition experiments were
correlated with molecular dynamics simulations of the substrate and the new inhibitor C-6-azido-
NAG-thiazoline (2) docked into crystal structures and homology models of enzymes used in
the inhibition tests.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis of NAG-Thiazoline Derivatives 2–10
NAG-thiazoline (1), prepared from 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-1,3,4,6-tetraacetyl-β-D-glucopyranoside
using Lawesson’s reagent followed by Zemplén deacetylation [1], was used as starting material for
derivatizations. Compound 1 was activated at C-6 by tosylation with TsCl in pyridine followed by the
reaction with NaN3 in DMF [10] and the obtained azido derivative 2 was then treated with respective
alkyne derivatives under Cu+ catalysis (Cu-AAC, copper catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition). Eight
new derivatives of NAG-thiazoline attached via triazole ring at C-6 were prepared. Two structures of
these series are dimeric NAG-thiazolines bridged by aliphatic or etheric linkers (Scheme 1), which are
non-hydrolysable in vivo.
Scheme 1. Synthetic pathway.
Reagents and Conditions: (a) TsCl, pyridine, 20 °C, 1 h; then NaN3, DMF, 60 °C, 16 h; (b) CH3CN,
DIPEA, CuI, 20 °C, 16 h.
Excess of monofunctional alkyne afforded triazole derivatives substituted by a sugar unit at N-1 of
the triazole moiety (Scheme 1). Half equivalent of the bifunctional alkyne linked two NAG-thiazoline
moieties in an analogous way. The influence of the respective linkers attached to the triazole moiety

Molecules 2014, 19
3474
was evaluated to select the optimal linker type for multivalent presentation of this inhibitor, finally,
aliphatic (octa-1,7-diyne) and etheric (dipropargylether) dialkynes were employed. Reaction conditions
of Cu-AAC were improved with respect to the present acido-labile thiazoline moiety; the optimized
reactions catalyzed by CuI in acetonitrile and DIPEA afforded good yields.
2.2. Stability of the NAG-Thiazoline Parent Structure 1
Since some GlcNAc-processing enzymes such as fungal β-N-acetylhexosaminidases optimally act
(and are usually investigated) under acidic conditions [11] we examined the fate of NAG-thiazoline at
pH below 7 at 35 °C. As a result, the acid-labile thiazoline ring quickly (within minutes) decomposed
at pH < 6; at pH 6 the stability was safely acceptable for experiments that last maximally up to
one hour. A thorough HPLC monitoring of NAG-thiazoline stability at pH 6.5 revealed a quasi-linear
decomposition rate of ca 1% per hour, decreasing to 0.5% per hour after 3 h. After 24 h, the content of
intact NAG-thiazoline decreased to ca 70% of the original concentration. This demonstrates that the
use of NAG-thiazoline for long term experiments (in the range of days) at pH < 7 is unadvisable since
the decomposition rate is not negligible under these conditions; at lower pH the decomposition is
expected to proceed much faster.
The direct decomposition product of NAG-thiazoline is 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-1-thio-α-D-
glucopyranose (11a). Besides expected mutarotation to its β-anomer 11b, both these compounds
rapidly undergo spontaneous oxidation by air oxygen to form a rich mixture of products, presumably
of GlcNAc-S-(1↔1)-S-GlcNAc type (m/z = 456) (Scheme 2). Importantly, neither the hydrolytic
products 11a and 11b nor the originating oxidation products displayed any inhibition effects
comparable to thiazoline 1 (as shown in Talaromyces flavus β-N-acetylhexosaminidase). After
application of dithiothreitol, the oxidation mixture was reduced back to 11a and 11b, as confirmed by
in situ NMR and HPLC experiments.
Scheme 2. Decomposition products of NAG-thiazoline 1; 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-1-thio-α-
D-glucopyranose (11a), its β-anomer 11b formed by mutarotation and a mixture of
oxidation products (tentative structure) spontaneously originating by the action of air oxygen.
OH
O
HO
HO
spontaneous oxidation
(air oxygen)
NH
SH
H+
O
OH
O
O
S
OH
OH
O
11a
HN
S
HO
HO
HO
HO
O
OH
OH
mutarotation
H2O
HO
NH
N
S
O
1
OH
O
12
mixture of products
SH
HO
NH
O
11b

Molecules 2014, 19
3475
2.3. Inhibiton of GH20 and GH84 Glycosidases with NAG-Thiazoline Derivatives
The parent compound NAG-thiazoline (1) is a well established competitive mechanism-based
inhibitor of the GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases and GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases [1,5]. Based
on its structure, a number of analogues were designed and tested as β-N-acetylhexosaminidase
inhibitors, including various N-acyl-derivatives [3,5,6] and the C-6-acylated derivatives [8]. Thus, the
prepared monomeric (2–8) and dimeric (9,10) derivatives of NAG-thiazoline bearing the azido or
triazole moiety at C-6 were designed as potential competitive inhibitors of GlcNAc-processing
enzymes from the families 20 and 84 of glycoside hydrolases.
One bacterial and one eukaryotic model enzyme of each glycosidase family were selected for the
inhibition study: the GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases from Streptomyces plicatus (bacterial) and
Talaromyces flavus (fungal) and GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
(bacterial) and humans. Bacterial and human enzymes were prepared by heterologous expression in
E. coli using standard procedures and purified by metal affinity chromatography from the lysed cells.
β-N-Acetylhexosaminidase from T. flavus was expressed extracellularly in Pichia pastoris and purified
by cation exchange chromatography from the culture media. All new compounds were tested with all
of the enzymes but only the C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) displayed inhibition activity towards these
enzymes; the triazole-substituted NAG-thiazolines lacked any inhibition activity against the enzymes
used. The results of the Michaelis-Menten kinetic experiments with NAG-thiazoline (1) and
C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) using pNP-β-GlcNAc as a substrate are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Inhibition of β-N-acetylhexosaminidases and β-N-acetylglucosaminidases by
NAG-thiazoline 1 and its C-6-azido derivative 2 (substrate pNP-β-GlcNAc; pH 7; 25 °C).
KI [µM]
KI [µM]
Enzyme
NAG-thiazoline (1) C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2)
β-N-acetylhexosaminidase
T. flavus
S. plicatus
42.7 ± 1.9
24 ± 5
211.9 ± 16.3
n.d.
O-GlcNAcase
B. thetaiotaomicron
human
0.029 ± 0.003
0.18 ± 0.03
3.1 ± 0.3
19.3 ± 11.9
n.d. = not determined.
The inhibition constants presented in Table 1 clearly indicate the stronger effect of both inhibitors
with the GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases, while with GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases the
inhibition activity of the tested inhibitors is significantly (up to three orders of magnitude) lower or
even negligible as in the case of bacterial β-N-acetylhexosaminidase and the azido-derivative 2.
However, in all cases the newly designed C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) performed somewhat worse
than the original NAG-thiazoline; with O-GlcNAcases the inhibition constants appeared approximately
hundred times higher. We can conclude that both tested inhibitors are highly selective for the GH84
glycosidases while the C-6-azido derivative 2 remains less effective than the parent compound 1.
Similar result has been shown previously with other structurally modified NAG-thiazolines [5,6,8]
with the only exception of the potential Alzheimer’s therapeutic thiamet-G [3]. Thus, new pathways
are still to be found that lead to derivatives conquering the inhibition potency of 1.

Molecules 2014, 19
3476
2.4. Interactions and Calculated Binding Energies of C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) in The Active
Site of Enzymes
To obtain a deeper understanding of the inhibition on a molecular scale, we performed molecular
docking and consequent molecular dynamics simulations of inhibitors 1 and 2 and the artificial
substrate pNP-β-GlcNAc. In molecular dynamics simulations the solvent is explicitly included, and
after initial equilibration at the given temperature the full conformational space of the
substrate/inhibitor-enzyme complexes is sampled, which significantly improves further analysis of the
initial docked poses and gives a more realistic understanding of the substrate-enzyme interaction. In
the simulations substrate/inhibitor-enzyme complexes adapted to the environment and reached
equilibrium around 5 ns as estimated by root mean square deviation, and only the production run
hereafter was used for analysis. For energy calculations complex conformations from the last 2 ns of
the production runs were used to ensure that they represent the equilibrated substrate/inhibitor-enzyme
complex. The binding energy hereby is estimated as the sum of the intermolecular energy calculated
by the force field and the torsional free-energy penalty. Hereby, the intermolecular energy includes
terms for electrostatic energy, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals interactions, and a desolvation energy
estimate. A comparison of the calculated binding energies and type of interactions for the various
complexes is presented in Table 2. The strongest binding was observed in the complex of the bacterial
O-GlcNAcase and C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2), whose binding energy is significantly lower than the
one calculated for the substrate and also inhibitor 1. The interaction of the inhibitor with the active site
of bacterial O-GlcNAcase is enhanced by two π-cation interactions, one by the azido-group at the C-6
atom with residues Tyr345 and His433, the other one by the positively charged nitrogen atom in the
oxazolinium ring involving Tyr282 and Trp337 compared to pNP-β-GlcNAc (Figure 1). However,
His433 is not conserved throughout the family and in human β-N-acetylglucosaminidase this position
is filled by the smaller and neutral valine in the vicinity of the inhibitor’s azido-group.
Table 2. Binding energies * in the molecular dynamics simulations calculated by
AutoDock (number of hydrogen bonds throughout the simulations).
NAG-thiazoline
(1) [kcal/mol]
C-6-azido-NAG-
thiazoline (2)
[kcal/mol]
pNP-β-GlcNAc
Enzyme
[kcal/mol]
β-N-
S. plicatus
T. flavus
−9.22 (6−7)
−7.63 (3−6)
−7.14 (4−5)
−6.42 (3−4)
−7.36 (3−5)
−7.71 (3−4)
−8.65 (4−5)
−7.16 (3−4)
−9.48 (5−8)
−10.19 (6−9)
−7.75 (6−7)
−7.45 (5−6)
acetylhexosaminidase
O-GlcNAcase
B. thetaiotaomicron
human
* Lower binding energy corresponds to better binding.
Surprisingly, inhibitor 2 appeared to bind better than 1 into the active site of both bacterial and
human β-N-acetylglucosaminidases. This improvement could be explained by π-cation interaction of
C-6 azido-group with aromatic residues (Figure 2). In the case of human GH84 enzyme this interaction
is weaker and occurs just with Tyr286 (corresponds to Tyr345 in bacterial GH84). This together with
the loss of a hydrogen bonding interaction of human Asn280 with C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2)
caused the significantly weaker binding of inhibitor 2 (Figure 3) to human β-N-acetylglucosaminidase.

Molecules 2014, 19
Figure 1. C-6-Azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) (A) and substrate pNP-β-GlcNAc (B) in the
3477
active site of bacterial β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (B. thetaiotaomicron). Color scheme:
carbon atom–cyan, oxygen–red, nitrogen–blue, sulfur–green, hydrogens are omitted;
hydrogen bonds–green dashed line with marked donor-acceptor length in Ångstroms;
residues participating in π-cation interaction are shown schematically.
Figure 2. Overlay of NAG-thiazoline (1) and C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) and in the
active site of bacterial β-N-acetylglucosaminidase. Bacterial residues and C-6-azido-NAG-
thiazoline are labeled in vivid colors using the color scheme analogous to Figure 1.
Bacterial residues and NAG-thiazoline are shown in grey. Common residues participating
in hydrogen bond or π-cation interactions are in circles.

Molecules 2014, 19
Figure 3. Overlay of C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) in the active site of human and
3478
bacterial β-N-acetylglucosaminidases. Bacterial residues are labeled in the upper lines,
human Lys98 and Asn280 are shown schematically only, as they are not in hydrogen bond
distance to the inhibitor. Bacterial active site amino acid residues are shown in color,
human enzyme is presented in grey. Residues His433 (magenta) in the bacterial enzyme
and the corresponding Val376 (yellow) in the human enzyme are shown in stick
representation. Val376 is unable to form a π-cation interaction with the azido-group
(N9-N10-N11) of 2. Other interactions are similar to the bacterial enzyme. Color scheme is
the same as in Figure 1.
A different character of interactions was observed in the case of GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases.
Here, the azido-group of inhibitor 2 docked into the active site is not surrounded by aromatic residues
like in bacterial O-GlcNAcase, weakening the stability of the resulting complexes. Generally, the
affinity of β-N-acetylhexosaminidases to modified NAG-thiazoline 2 is lower than to the substrate that
has more hydrogen bonding partners and a π-π stacking interaction of the p-nitrophenyl group with
tryptophan residues (Figure 4A). In the fungal enzyme, the C-3 hydroxyl group of 2 contributes to one
additional hydrogen bond with Glu322 and Trp509. Again, residue Glu322 is not conserved
throughout the family and in the bacterial β-N-acetylhexosaminidase a valine is present in this
position. Equilibrium orientation of the azido-group in C-6 modified NAG-thiazoline in the active site
of bacterial GH20 is different from NAG-thiazoline and substrate, because orientation of some
residues in the vicinity of C-6 atom is changed to accommodate the azido-group (Figure 4B), which
explains the minor potential of compound 2 to inhibit this bacterial enzyme. In the case of T. flavus
enzyme, the equilibrium orientations of inhibitor 2 and substrate were similar and did not initiate
distortions in the vicinity of the C-6 atom (Figure 5).
Overall, the results of molecular docking appear to be in a good correlation with the performed kinetic
experiments, predicting the best inhibition for bacterial O-GlcNAcase and suggesting a molecular
explanation for the undetermined inhibition constant with bacterial β-N-acetylhexosaminidase. These
results give us an idea about potency of the mentioned enzymes to tolerate modifications for future
inhibitor constructions.

Molecules 2014, 19
Figure 4. Overlay of pNP-β-GlcNAc and C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) docked into the
3479
active site of bacterial β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (S. plicatus). (A) Hydrogen bond
interaction in the active site. Color scheme is like in Figure 1. Enzyme with docked
pNP-β-GlcNAc is shown in color and C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline in grey. (B) Active site
amino acids changed orientation during MD with C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (yellow
color). Enzyme and pNP-β-GlcNAc are shown in magenta. Distances between
corresponding atoms (Å; in blue) of identical residues are labeled.
Figure 5. Overlay of C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) in the active site of
β-N-acetylhexosaminidases from T. flavus (in color, active site amino acids are labeled in
the upper line) and S. plicatus (grey, active site amino acids are labeled in the lower line).
Common amino acid residues participating in the interaction are emphasized by circles.
Trp408 from S. plicatus contributes only to the hydrophobic interaction with the inhibitor.
Due to the slightly different orientation of the inhibitor in the active site of both enzymes,
Arg162 from S. plicatus contributes to hydrogen bonds with atoms O-3 and O-4, while
Arg218 (from the T. flavus enzyme) is able to form just one hydrogen bond with the
O-3 atom.

Molecules 2014, 19
3480
3. Experimental
3.1. General Methods
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Prague, Czech Republic). Reactions were
monitored by TLC with pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheets from Merck (Prague, Czech
Republic), detected with UV light and/or charred with sulfuric acid (5% H2SO4 in EtOH). Compounds
were purified by column flash chromatography with silica gel 60 (230–240 mesh, Merck). Solvents
were distilled and dried according to the standard procedures before use.
3.2. NMR Spectroscopy
1
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer (400.00 MHz for H,
100.58 MHz for 13C at 30 °C in CD3OD-compounds 2–10) and a Bruker Avance III 700 MHz
1
13
spectrometer (700.13 MHz for H, 176.07 MHz for C at 30 °C in D2O-compounds 11a and 11b).
Residual signals of solvent were used as internal standards (δH 3.330 ppm, δC 49.30 ppm for CD3OD;
δH 4.508 ppm for D2O). Carbon chemical shifts in D2O were referenced to acetone (δC 30.50 ppm).
1
13
NMR experiments H-NMR, C-NMR, gCOSY, gHSQC, and gHMBC were performed using the
1
13
manufacturer’s software. H-NMR and C-NMR spectra were zero filled to fourfold data points and
multiplied by window function before Fourier transformation. Two-parameter double-exponential
1
Lorentz-Gauss function was applied for H to improve resolution and line broadening (1 Hz) was
13
applied to get better C signal-to-noise ratio. Chemical shifts are given in δ-scale with digital
resolution justifying the reported values to three (δH) or two (δC) decimal places. The full NMR spectra
of the newly prepared compounds 2–10 are presented in the Supplementary material.
Proton spin systems of thiazoline and triazole-linker moieties were assigned by COSY and by
HSQC transferred to carbons; HMBC experiment enabled to join the above mentioned partial structures
together. Thiazoline structure was proved by the presence of methyl doublet (J = 2.0 or 2.1 Hz) correlated
in HMBC to carbons C-1 and C-2. Dimer formation (compounds 9 and 10) was unambiguously
confirmed by the auto-correlation cross peak of the central carbon of the linker (C-3' for 10 and C-5'
for 9). 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 2–10 are provided in the Supplementary information.
3.3. Mass Spectrometry
The exact masses were measured using LTQ Orbitrap XL hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ion source. The mobile phase consisted
of methanol/water (4:1), flow rate 30 μL/min, and the samples were injected using a 2-μL loop. The
mass spectra of positively charged ions were internally calibrated using protonated phthalic anhydride
as lock mass. Data were acquired and processed using Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
HRMS spectra of compounds 2–10 are provided in the Supplementary information.
3.4. Synthesis of NAG-Thiazoline Derivatives 2–10
6-Azido-1,2-dideoxy-2'-methyl-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline (2): 1,2-Dideoxy-2'-methyl-α-D-
glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline prepared according to Knapp and coworkers [1] (1, 1 g 4.56 mmol) was

Molecules 2014, 19
3481
dissolved in the mixture of dry pyridine (10 mL) and dry CH2Cl2 (10 mL), cooled to 0 °C and TsCl
(1 g, 5.25 mmol) was added. Reaction mixture was stirred 1 h at room temperature and then CH2Cl2
(10 mL) was added. Organic phase was washed twice with H2O and dried over Na2SO4. Solvents were
evaporated, the tosylated derivative was dried in vacuo, dissolved in dry DMF (15 mL) and NaN3
(800 mg, 11.9 mmol, 2.6 eq) was added. Reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C overnight. Title
compound 2 was at first purified by column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc/MeOH = 9:1). Isolated
mixture of expected product 2 and corresponding 3,6-anhydro-derivative were separated by gel
filtration using Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare by AP Czech, Prague, Czech Republic) using 80%
1
MeOH as an eluent. Product 2 was isolated as a white solid (223 mg, 20%). H-NMR (400.00 MHz,
CD3OD): 2.288 (3H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, CH3), 3.418 (2H, m, H-6), 3.471 (1H, m, H-5), 3.588 (1H, ddd,
J = 8.8, 3.6, 1.0 Hz, H-4) 4.169 (1H, ddd, J = 4.7, 3.6, 0.7 Hz, H-3), 4.377 (1H, dddq, J = 7.0, 4.7, 1.0,
13
2.1 Hz, H-2), 6.394 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1). C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 20.96 (CH3), 53.62
(C-6), 72.67 (C-4), 74.35 (C-3), 75.24 (C-5), 80.83 (C-2), 90.89 (C-1), 170.96 (=C-). HRMS:
C8H12O3N4NaS calcd. 267.05223; m/z [M+Na]+ found 267.05227.
6-(4-Butyltriazolyl)-1,2-dideoxy-2'-methyl-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline (3): Compound 2
(100 mg, 0.41 mmol) was dissolved in the mixture of acetonitrile (3 mL) and N,N-
diisopropylethylamine (0.2 mL). Hexyne (0.1 mL) and CuI (30 mg) were added and reaction mixture
was stirred overnight at room temperature. The product was isolated after evaporation of solvents by
column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc-MeOH = 9:1). Butyl derivative 3 was isolated as a white
1
solid (38 mg, 28%). H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 0.967 (3H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H-6'), 1.395 (2H, m,
H-5'), 1.665 (2H, m, H-4'), 2.237 (3H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, CH3), 2,710 (2H, dt, J = 0.6, 7.5 Hz, H-3'), 3.575
(2H, m, H-4, H-5), 4.245 (1H, dd, ΣJ = 6.8 Hz, H-3), 4.380 (1H, dddq, ΣJ = 18.1 Hz, H-2), 4.474 (1H,
dd, J = 14.4, 8.0 Hz, H-6u), 4.717 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 1.9 Hz, H-6d), 6.330 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1),
13
7.695 (1H, t, J = 0.6 Hz, H-1'). C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 14.41 (C-6'), 20.82 (CH3), 23.39
(C-5'), 26.18 (C-3'), 32.96 (C-4'), 53.25 (C-6), 73.05 (C-4), 74.17 (C-3), 74.50 (C-5), 80.90 (C-2),
90.66 (C-1), 124.41 (C-1'), 149.36 (C-2'), 170.84 (=C-). HRMS: C14H23O3N4S calcd. 327.14854; m/z
[M+H]+ found 327.14848.
1,2-Dideoxy-2'-methyl-6-(4-phenyltriazolyl)-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline (4): Compound 4
was prepared analogously as described for the compound 3 from azide 2 (100 mg) and phenylacetylene
1
(0.1 mL) yielding title compound 4 as a white solid (50 mg, 35%). H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD):
2.239 (3H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, CH3), 3.631 (1H, ddd, J = 9.1, 3.2, 1.0 Hz, H-4), 3.689 (1H, dddd, J = 9.1, 7.7,
2.5, 0.4 Hz, H-5), 4.269 (1H, dd, J = 4.7, 3.2 Hz, H-3), 4.399 (1H, dddq, J = 7.0, 4.7, 1.0, 2.1 Hz, H-2),
4.598 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 7.7 Hz, H-6u), 4.806 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 2.5 Hz, H-6d), 6.368 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz,
H-1), 7.352 (1H, m, H-para), 7.443 (2H, m, H-meta), 7.825 (2H, m, H-ortho), 8.283 (1H, s, H-1').
13C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 20.92 (CH3), 53.38 (C-6), 72.29 (C-4), 74.18 (C-3), 74.39 (C-5),
80.74 (C-2), 90.63 (C-1), 123.60 (C-1'), 126.95 (C-ortho), 129.59 (C-para), 130.23 (C-meta), 131.92
(C-ipso), 148.94 (C-2'), 171.10 (=C-). HRMS: C16H19O3N4S calcd. 347.11724; m/z [M+H]+
found 347.11704.

Molecules 2014, 19
3482
1,2-Dideoxy-6-(4-hydroxymethyltriazolyl)-2'-methyl-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline
(5):
Compound 5 was prepared as described for the compound 3 from azide 2 (100 mg) and
propargylalcohol (0.1 mL) yielding hydroxymethyl derivative 5 as a white solid (20 mg, 16%).
1H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 2.241 (3H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, CH3), 3.562 (1H, ddd, J = 9.1, 3.3, 1.0 Hz,
H-4), 3.639 (1H, dddd, J = 9.1, 7.9, 2.5, 0.4 Hz, H-5), 4.222 (1H, dd, J = 4.6, 3.3 Hz, H-3), 4.372 (1H,
dddq, J = 7.0, 4.6, 1.0, 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.542 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 7.9 Hz, H-6u), 4.696 (2H, d, J = 0.6 Hz,
H-3'), 4.751 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 2.5 Hz, H-6d), 6.337 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1), 7.887 (1H, t, J = 0.6 Hz,
13
H-1'). C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 20.86 (CH3), 53.26 (C-6), 56.77 (C-3'), 72.89 (C-4), 74.20
(C-3), 74.39 (C-5), 80.78 (C-2), 90.70 (C-1), 124.41 (C-1'), 149.20 (C-2'), 170.95 (=C-). HRMS:
C11H17O4N4S calcd. 301.09650; m/z [M+H]+ found 301.09650.
1,2-Dideoxy-2'-methyl-6-(4-trimethylsilyltriazolyl)-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline
(6):
Compound 6 was prepared as described for compound 3 from azide 2 (100 mg) and
trimethylsilylacetylene (0.1 mL) yielding trimethylsilyl derivative 6 as a white solid (50 mg, 36%).
1H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 0.334 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3), 2.261 (3H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, CH3), 3.594 (1H,
ddd, J = 9.2, 3.1, 0.8 Hz, H-4), 3.641 (1H, ddd, J = 9.2, 7.6, 2.3 Hz, H-5), 4.272 (1H, dd, J = 4.5,
3.1 Hz, H-3), 4.405 (1H, m, H-2), 4.569 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 7.6 Hz, H-6u), 4.796 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 2.3 Hz,
13
H-6d), 6.341 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1), 7.970 (1H, s, H-1'). C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): −0.78
(Si(CH3)3), 21.10 (CH3), 52.77 (C-6), 72.99 (C-4), 74.27 (C-3), 74.58 (C-5), 80.82 (C-2), 90.61 (C-1),
132.82 (C-1'), 147.47 (C-2'), 171.39 (=C-). HRMS: C13H23O3N4SSi calcd. 343.12546; m/z [M+H]+
found 343.12537.
1,2-Dideoxy-6-[4-(hex-5-ynyl)triazolyl]-2'-methyl-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline (7) and 1,4-
Bis[(1,2-dideoxy-2´-methyl-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2´-thiazolin-6-yl)-triazol-4-yl]-butane (9)
Compound 2 (300 mg, 1.23 mmol) was dissolved in the mixture of acetonitrile (15 mL) and
N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.6 mL). Octa-1,7-diyne (0.08 mL) and CuI (150 mg) were added and the
reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The products were isolated after
evaporation of solvents by column chromatography (silica gel, CHCl3/MeOH = 6:1). Monomeric
derivative 7 was isolated as a white solid (75 mg, 17%) and dimeric derivative 9 was then eluted by
methanol gradient as a white solid (69 mg, 19%).
1
Compound 7: H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 1.571 (2H, m, H-5'), 1.802 (2H, m, H-4'), 2.233 (3H,
m, H-6', H-8'), 2.242 (3H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, CH3), 2.738 (2H, dt, J = 0.6, 7.4 Hz, H-3'), 3.567 (2H, m, H-4,
H-5), 4.249 (1H, m, H-3), 4.382 (1H, dqm, J = 7.0, 2.1 Hz, H-2), 4.474 (1H, m, H-6u), 4.723 (1H, m,
13
H-6d), 6.331 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1), 7.718 (1H, t, J = 0.6 Hz, H-1'). C-NMR (100.58 MHz,
CD3OD): 19.06 (C-6'), 20.81 (CH3), 25.95 (C-3'), 29.22 (C-5'), 29.78 (C-4'), 53.28 (C-6), 70.01 (C-8',
73.08 (C-4), 74.14 (C-3), 74.50 (C-5), 80.81 (C-2), 85.12(C-7'), 90.62 (C-1), 124.51 (C-1'), 149.01 (C-2'),
171.10 (=C-). HRMS: C16H22O3N4NaS calcd. 373.13048; m/z [M+Na]+ found 373.13033.
1
Compound 9: H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 1.734 (2H, m, H-4'), 2.228 (3H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, CH3),
2.754 (2H, m, H-3'), 3.561 (1H, m, H-4), 3.584 (1H, m, H-5), 4.230 (1H, m, H-3), 4.371 (1H, dddq,
J = 7.0, 4.8, 0.8, 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.485 (1H, m, H-6u), 4.712 (1H, m, H-6d), 6.329 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz,

Molecules 2014, 19
3483
13
H-1), 7.717 (1H, t, J = 0.6 Hz, H-1'). C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 20.86 (CH3), 26.18 (C-3'),
30.00 (C-4'), 53.25 (C-6), 73.01 (C-4), 74.20 (C-3), 74.50 (C-5), 80.90 (C-2), 90.70 (C-1), 124.62 (C-1'),
149.03 (C-2'), 170.82 (=C-). HRMS: C24H35O6N8S2 calcd. 595.21155; m/z [M+H]+ found 595.21133.
1,2-Dideoxy-2'-methyl-6-[4-(propargyloxymethyl)-triazolyl]-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2'-thiazoline (8)
and bis{[(1,2-dideoxy-2´-methyl-α-D-glucopyrano-[2,1-d]-∆2´-thiazoline-6-yl)-triazol-4-yl]-methyl}
ether (10)
Compounds 8 and 10 were prepared as described for the compounds 7 and 9, respectively, from the
azide 2 (300 mg) and dipropargylether (0.08 mL) yielding monomeric derivative 8 as a white solid
(10 mg, 2.4%) and dimeric derivative 10 as a white solid (100 mg, 28%).
Compound 8: 1H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 2.242 (3H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, CH3), 2.915 (1H, t, J = 2.4 Hz,
H-6'), 3.568 (1H, m, H-4), 3.610 (1H, m, H-5), 4.211 (2H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-4'), 4.241 (1H, dd, J = 4.5,
2.7 Hz, H-3), 4.379 (1H, dddq, J = 7.0, 4.5, 0.9, 2.1 Hz, H-2), 4.538 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 7.7 Hz, H-6u),
4.702 (2H, d, J = 0.5 Hz, H-3'), 4.762 (1H, dd, J = 14.4, 2.3 Hz, H-6d), 6.336 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1),
13
7.954 (1H, t, J = 0.5 Hz, H-1'). C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 20.83 (CH3), 53.33 (C-6), 58.28
(C-4'), 63.47 (C-3'), 72.99 (C-4), 74.16 (C-3), 74.35 (C-5), 76.73 (C-6'), 80.49 (C-5'), 80.83 (C-2),
90.65 (C-1), 126.62 (C-1'), 145.41 (C-2'), 170.93 (=C-). HRMS: C14H19O4N4S calcd. 339.11215;
m/z [M+H]+ found 339.11203.
1
Compound 10: H-NMR (400.00 MHz, CD3OD): 2.236 (6H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, CH3), 3.567 (2H, ddd,
J = 9.1, 2.9, 1.0 Hz, H-4), 3.615 (2H, dddd, J = 9.1, 7.6, 2.4, 0.4 Hz, H-5), 4.238 (2H, dd, J = 4.5, 2.9 Hz,
H-3), 4.378 (2H, dddq, J = 7.0, 4.5, 1.0, 2.1 Hz, H-2), 4.549 (2H, dd, J = 14.4, 7.6 Hz, H-6u), 4.667
(4H, d, J = 0.4 Hz, H-3'), 4.763 (2H, dd, J = 14.4, 2.4 Hz, H-6d), 6.341 (2H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1), 7.967
(2H, t, J = 0.4 Hz, H-1'). 13C-NMR (100.58 MHz, CD3OD): 20.86 (CH3), 53.32 (C-6), 64.12
(C-3'), 72.95 (C-4), 74.15 (C-3), 74.36 (C-5), 80.81 (C-2), 90.68 (C-1), 126.62 (C-1'), 145.73 (C-2'),
170.91 (=C-). HRMS: C22H31O7N8S2 calcd. 583.17516; m/z [M+H]+ found 583.17503.
3.5. Stability of NAG-Thiazoline 1
NAG-thiazoline (1; 200 mM) was incubated in 50 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer pH 6.5 at 35 °C and
850 rpm. Aliquots (10 μL) were taken at regular time intervals (30–60 min), mixed with 95% CH3CN
(40 μL) and analyzed by HPLC. Chromatography was carried out on the Shimadzu Prominence UFLC
system (Kyoto, Japan) consisting of DGU-20A mobile phase degasser, two LC-20AD solvent delivery
units, SIL-20ACHT cooling autosampler, CTO-10AS column oven and SPD-M20A diode array
detector. The HILIC column TSKgel Amide-80 (250 × 4.6 mm i.d., Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart,
Germany) was used as a stationary phase. The PDA data were acquired in the 190–320 nm range and
the 200 nm signal was extracted. Gradient elution: mobile phase A (CH3CN); mobile phase B (H2O);
gradient, 0–2 min, 20% B; 2–15 min, 20%–60% B; 15–16 min, 60% B, 16–18 min, 60%–20% B,
18–21 min, 20% B (column equilibration). Flow rate was 1 mL/min at 25 °C. The experiment was
monitored for 24 h. Retention times were found as follows: NAG-thiazoline 1, 6.1 min; α-GlcNAc-SH
11a, 6.8 min; β-GlcNAc-SH 11b, 7.1 min; oxidation products, 9–13 min. In situ reduction of the

Molecules 2014, 19
3484
products of spontaneous oxidation was performed by adding dithiothreitol (1 M) to the reaction
mixture in the final concentration of 100 mM and monitored by HPLC and NMR.
3.6. Analysis of Decomposition Products of NAG-Thiazoline 1
NAG-thiazoline (1; 200 mg, 0.91 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer pH 6.5
(4 mL) and incubated at 35 °C and 850 rpm for 5 h. Then, the reaction volume was reduced to
2.5 mL in vacuo and the reaction mixture was loaded on a Biogel P-2 column (BioRad, Prague, Czech
Republic) in water, flow rate 12 mL/h. A mixture of oxidation products was isolated (20 mg). This
mixture was further practically inseparable since the compounds coexisted in equilibrium. Analysis by
MS revealed the presence of masses corresponding to C8H15NO5S calcd. 237.07, m/z [M–H]− found
236.0; and to C16H28N2O10S2 (tentative structure GlcNAc-S-(1↔1)-S-GlcNAc) calc. 472.1, m/z
[M–H]− found 471.0 (HPLC and MS are presented in the Supplementary Information). After
application of dithiothreitol, the oxidation mixture was quickly reduced to the anomeric mixture of
1
2-acetamido-2-deoxy-1-thio-D-glucopyranose 11a (α) and 11b (β). (11a) H-NMR (700.13 MHz,
D2O): 1.749 (3H, s, 2-Ac), 3.136 (1H, dd, J = 10.1, 8.5 Hz, H-4), 3.507 (2H, d, J = 3.7 Hz, H-6), 3.565
(1H, dd, J = 10.5, 8.5 Hz, H-3), 3.685 (1H, dd, J = 10.5, 5.0 Hz, H-2), 3.862 (1H, dt, J = 10.1, 3.7 Hz,
H-5), 5.272 (1H, d, J = 5.0 Hz, H-1), 13C-NMR (176.07 MHz, D2O): 22.45 (2-Ac), 55.29 (C-2), 60.93
(C-6), 70.73 (C-4), 71.37 (C-5), 71.56 (C-3), 80.37 (C-1), 174.27 (CO). (11b): 1H-NMR (700.13 MHz,
D2O): 1.742 (3H, s, 2-Ac), 3.124 (1H, m, H-5), 3.150 (1H, m, H-4), 3.174 (1H, m, H-3), 3.352 (1H,
dd, J = 10.0, 9.9 Hz, H-2), 3.396 (1H, dd, J = 12.4, 5.5 Hz, H-6u), 3.577 (1H, dd, J = 12.4, 2.0 Hz,
H-6d), 4.385 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, H-1), 13C-NMR (176.07 MHz, D2O): 22.57 (2-Ac), 59.72 (C-2), 61.25
(C-6), 70.18 (C-4), 75.78 (C-3), 80.23 (C-5), 80.69 (C-1), 174.63 (C=O). Results of NMR analysis of
oxidation product mixture are not in contradiction with the structure GlcNAc-S-(1↔1)-S-GlcNAc as
proposed from the MS measurement.
3.7. Enzymes
β-N-Acetylhexosaminidase from Talaromyces flavus was extracellularly expressed in Pichia
pastoris and purified from the culture media by cation exchange chromatography as described
previously [12]. The gene of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase from Streptomyces plicatus (GenBank ID:
AF063001.3) was prepared synthetically as a His6-tagged fusion protein (Geneart, Regensburg,
Germany) and cloned into the bacterial expression vector pET-15b via the NdeI and BamHI restriction
sites. The gene was intracellularly expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS strain (Promega, Prague,
Czech Republic) under the IPTG (0.5 mM) induction. After 16 h of cultivation at 25 °C, the cells were
harvested by centrifugation (4,000 ×g, 15 min) and resuspended in a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7)
with 50 mM NaCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and
lysozyme (1 mg/mL). The cells were then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and disrupted with ultrasound
(6 × 1 min). After centrifugation (13,500 ×g, 10 min) the supernatant was loaded onto Ni-NTA agarose
column (Qiagen by Dynex, Bustehrad, Czech Republic). The column was equilibrated with 50 mM
Tris/HCl buffer with 150 mM KCl and 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.4. The fusion protein was eluted from
the column using 50 mM Tris/HCl buffer supplemented with 150 mM KCl and 250 mM imidazole, pH
7.4. The purity of the fractions was determined by 10% SDS-PAGE.

Molecules 2014, 19
3485
The genes of O-GlcNAcase from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and human O-GlcNAcase were
obtained from Prof. D. Vocadlo (SFU, Burnaby, BC, Canada). The genes were intracellularly
expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS strain under the induction by IPTG (0.5 mM). After 4 h of
cultivation at 16 °C, the cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,000 ×g, 15 min). The procedure for the
isolation of both O-GlcNAcases was analogous to the purification procedure for β-N-acetylhexosaminidase
from Streptomyces plicatus as described above.
3.8. β-N-Acetylhexosaminidase and O-GlcNAcase Activity and Inhibition Assays
β-N-Acetylhexosaminidase and O-GlcNAcase activities were assayed in end-point experiments
using p-nitrophenyl 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranoside (pNP-β-GlcNAc; Sigma Aldrich) as a
substrate; starting concentration 2 mM. One unit of enzymatic activity was defined as the amount of
enzyme releasing 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol per minute in 50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 and
35 °C. After incubation of the reaction mixture at 35 °C for 10 min, the liberated p-nitrophenol was
determined spectrophotometrically at 420 nm under alkaline conditions (50 μL of the reaction mixture
was added to 1 mL of 0.1 M Na2CO3).
Michaelis-Menten kinetics of β-N-acetylglucosaminidase reactions was measured in a kinetic assay
at 348 nm (isosbestic point of p-nitrophenol), using pNP-β-GlcNAc as substrate with its concentration
in the range of 0.04–0.5 mM (50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 25 °C); in the inhibition assays
the concentration of the inhibitors ranged from 0.001 to 0.5 mM for O-GlcNAcases and from 0.05 to
2 mM for β-N-acetylhexosaminidases. All data were measured in five parallels; the non-linear
regression was calculated using Enzfitter (Biosoft, UK). Lineweaver-Burk plots for the individual
experiments are shown in the Supplementary information.
3.9. Molecular Modeling and Docking
C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) was constructed in YASARA by modification of the crystal structure
of NAG-thiazoline (1) extracted from the enzyme/inhibitor complex of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase
from Streptomyces plicatus with NAG-thiazoline (pdb code: 1hp5) [13]. Quantum calculations to
determine the partial charges were performed in Gaussian 03 [14] at the B3LYP/6-31G(p,d) level of
theory. The resulting charges were converted to RESP charges by Antechamber [15] and included in
the molecular topology to be used in YASARA. pNP-β-GlcNAc was constructed in YASARA by
modification of di-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (chitobiose), extracted from the crystal structure of
chitobiase from Serratia marcescens (pdb code: 1qbb) [16].
The substrate pNP-β-GlcNAc, inhibitor C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) and NAG-thiazoline (1) were
docked in the active site of selected β-N-acetylhexosaminidases (GH20) and β-N-acetylglucosaminidases
(GH84) using rigid docking in AutoDock 4.2.3 [17] to accommodate them properly in the active site of
enzymes, using a grid space of 0.275 Å, the Lamarckian genetic algorithm [18], and 100 docking runs).
Structures of enzymes used for docking are listed as follows: crystal structure of O-GlcNAcase from
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (pdb code: 2chn) [19]; model of human O-GlcNAcase [20]; crystal
structure of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase from Streptomyces plicatus (pdb code: 1hp5) [13] and the
model of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase from Talaromyces flavus (will be published elsewhere). The
obtained complexes with best docking scores were used for molecular dynamics simulation in water

Molecules 2014, 19
3486
with YASARA (isothermal–isobaric ensemble (NPT), counter ions to reach neutrality, YASARA 2
force field [21], periodic boundary condition, long range electrostatics treated by Particle Mesh Ewald
method [22]). Molecular dynamics simulations were run for more than 10 ns and analyzed. Root mean
square deviation of all C-alpha and of active site amino acid residues was used to asses if complexes
are equilibrated. Additionally, the interaction energy from the force field was calculated during the
whole simulation with YASARA to monitor if the energy reaches a stable plateau and thus indicates
that the substrate/inhibitor interaction with the enzyme is stable. Finally, a set of representative
structures of stable substrate/inhibitor-enzyme complexes from the last 2 ns of the equilibrated
production period of the simulations was used for binding energy calculations by AutoDock and for
analysis with YASARA. Interactions in the active site were shown with LigPlot+ [23] and YASARA.
4. Conclusions
A series of novel derivatives of GlcNAc-thiazolines substituted (compounds 2–8) or dimerized
at C-6 (compounds 9–10) bearing azido or triazole moieties were designed as potential
β-N-acetylhexosaminidase inhibitors and synthesized. New compounds were tested for their inhibitory
activities with GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases and GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases. One
bacterial and one eukaryotic model enzyme of each glycosidase family were selected for the inhibition
study: GH20 β-N-acetylhexosaminidases from Streptomyces plicatus (bacterial) and Talaromyces
flavus (fungal) and GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidases from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (bacterial)
and humans. While all the triazole-substituted NAG-thiazolines 3–10 lacked inhibition activity with
the enzymes used, the C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline (2) inhibited most of the enzymes in a moderate
way. Elaborated kinetic study was performed to compare both the original 1 and the new inhibitor 2.
Molecular docking of C-6-azido-NAG-thiazoline 2 into the active site of the respective enzymes and
consequent molecular dynamics simulations of the resulting complexes were performed to corroborate
the conclusions obtained from the “wet” experiments with a molecular explanation. Generally, the
affinity of β-N-acetylhexosaminidases to modified NAG-thiazoline 2 is lower than to the
substrate having more hydrogen bonding partners. A detailed stability study with unsubstituted
GlcNAc-thiazoline 1 has shown its decomposition at pH < 6 resulting in the thiazoline ring opening
yielding 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-1-thio-α/β-D-glucopyranoses 11a,b, which presumably dimerize
oxidatively into S-S linked dimers. Tentative structures of the products were supported by mass
spectrometry and NMR measurements. Decomposition products proved to have no inhibitory activity
towards β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (T. flavus).
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be accessed at: http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/19/3/3471/s1.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant P207/11/0629 and by EU project
NOVOSIDES FP7-KBBE-2010-4-265854. Access to computing and storage facilities owned by
parties and projects contributing to the National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum, provided under the

Molecules 2014, 19
3487
program “Projects of Large Infrastructure for Research, Development, and Innovations” (LM2010005)
is acknowledged. The authors would like to thank to D. Vocadlo (SFU, Burnaby, BC, Canada) for very
kindly providing the genes of O-GlcNAcase from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and human O-GlcNAcase.
Author Contributions
J. Krejzová and K. Slámová prepared the enzymes and measured inhibition kinetics, P. Šimon and
L. Kalachova synthesized compounds 1–10, P. Bojarová and P. Marhol performed the analysis of
inhibitor stability, H. Pelantová measured and interpreted NMR, J. Cvačka measured MS, N. Kulik and
R. Ettrich performed computational modeling, K. Slámová and V. Křen prepared the manuscript
for publication.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Knapp, S.; Vocadlo, D.; Gao, Z.; Kirk, B.; Lou, J.; Withers, S.G. NAG-Thiazoline, an N-acetyl-β-
hexosaminidase inhibitor that implicates acetamido participation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
6804–6805.
2. Slámová, K.; Bojarová, P.; Petrásková, L.; Křen, V. β-N-Acetylhexosaminidase: What’s in a
name…? Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 682–693.
3. Yuzwa, S.A.; Macauley, M.S.; Heinonen, J.E.; Shan, X.; Dennis, R.J.; He, Y.; Whitworth, G.E.;
Stubbs, K.A.; McEachern, E.J.; Davies, G.J.; et al. A potent mechanism-inspired O-GlcNAcase
inhibitor that blocks phosphorylation of tau in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4, 483–490.
4. Mahuran, D.J. Biochemical consequences of mutations causing the GM2 gangliosidoses. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1999, 1455, 105–138.
5. Macauley, M.S.; Whitworth, G.E.; Debowski, A.W.; Chin, D.; Vocadlo, D.J. O-GlcNAcase uses
substrate-assisted catalysis: Kinetic analysis and development of highly selective mechanism-
inspired inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25313–25322.
6. Knapp, S.; Abdo, M.; Ajayi, K.; Huhn, R.A.; Emge, T.J.; Kim, E.J.; Hanover, J.A. Tautomeric
modification of GlcNAc-thiazoline. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2321–2324.
7. Amorelli, B.; Yang, C.; Rempel, B.; Withers, S.G.; Knapp, S. N-Acetylhexosaminidase inhibitory
properties of C-1 homologated GlcNAc- and GalNAc-thiazolines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008,
18, 2944–2947.
8. Krejzová, J.; Šimon, P.; Vavříková, E.; Slámová, K.; Pelantová, H.; Riva, S.; Spiwok, V.; Křen, V.
Enzymatic synthesis of new C-6-acylated derivatives of NAG-thiazoline and evaluation of their
inhibitor activities towards fungal β-N-acetylhexosaminidase. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 2013, 87,
128–134.
9. Yuzwa, S.A.; Shan, X.; Maculey, M.S.; Clark, T.; Skorobogatko, Y.; Vosseller, K.; Vocadlo, D.
Increasing O-GlcNAc slows neurodegeneration and stabilizes tau against aggregation. J. Nat.
Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 393–399.

Molecules 2014, 19
3488
10. Vocadlo, D.; McEachern, E.W.O. Selective Glycosidase Inhibitors and Uses Thereof.
Patent 2008/025170 A1, 6 March 2008.
11. Fialová, P.; Weignerová, L.; Rauvolfová, J.; Přikrylová, V.; Pišvejcová, A.; Ettrich, R.; Kuzma, M.;
Sedmera, P.; Křen, V. Hydrolytic and transglycosylation reactions of N-acyl modified substrates
catalysed by β-N-acetylhexosaminidases. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 693–701.
12. Slámová, K.; Bojarová, P.; Gerstorferová, D.; Fliedrová, B.; Hofmeisterová, J.; Fiala, M.;
Pompach, P.; Křen, V. Sequencing, cloning and high-yield expression of a fungal β-N-
acetylhexosaminidase in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr. Purif. 2012, 82, 212–217.
13. Mark, B.L.; Vocadlo, D.J.; Knapp, S.; Triggs-Raine, B.L.; Withers, S.G.; James, M.N.G.
Crystallographic evidence for substrate-assisted catalysis in a bacterial β-hexosaminidase. J. Biol.
Chem. 2001, 276, 10330–10337.
14. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2004.
15. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Kollmann, P.; Case, D. Antechamber, an accessory software package for
molecular mechanical calculation. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 25, 1157–1174.
16. Tews, I.; Perrakis, A.; Oppenheim, A.; Dauter, Z.; Wilson, K.S.; Vorgias, C.E. Bacterial
chitobiase structure provides insight into catalytic mechanism and the basis of Tay-Sachs disease.
Nat. Struct. Biol. 1996, 3, 638–648.
17. Morris, G.M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M.F.; Belew, R.K.; Goodsell, D.S.; Olson, A.J.
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.
J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785–2791.
18. Morris, G.M.; Goodsell, D.S.; Halliday, R.S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W.E.; Belew, R.K.; Olson, A.J.
Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy
function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639–1662.
19. Dennis, R.J.; Taylor, E.J.; Macauley, M.S.; Stubbs, K.A.; Turkenburg, J.P.; Hart, S.J.; Black, G.N.;
Vocadlo, D.J.; Davies, G.J. Structure and mechanism of a bacterial β-glucosaminidase having
O-GlcNAcase activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 365–371.
20. Slámová, K.; Kulik, N.; Fiala, M.; Krejzová-Hofmeisterová, J.; Ettrich, R.; Křen, V. Expression,
characterization and homology modelling of a novel eukaryotic GH84 β-N-acetylglucosaminidase
fom Penicillium chrysogenum. Protein Expr. Purif. 2014, 95, 204–210.
21. Krieger, E.; Joo, K.; Lee, J.; Raman, S.; Thompson, J.; Tyka, M.; Baker, D.; Karplus, K.
Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling:
Four approaches that performed well in CASP8. Proteins 2009, 77, 114–122.
22. Essman, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M.L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L.G. A smooth particle
mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577–8593.
23. Laskowski, R.A.; Swindells, M.B. LigPlot+: Multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug
discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2778–2786.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1 and 2 are available from the authors at the Institute
of Microbilology, Prague, Czech Republic.
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).