Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
BRIEF ARTICLE
under reduced pressure and the residue triturated with diethyl ether to
yield 7: 2.90 g (68%).
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Spectroscopic details for 5,
b
1-(2,6-Difluorophenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indazol-3-ol (8).
7 (2.90 g, 15.6 mmol) and 2-oxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid methyl
ester (2.43 g, 15.6 mmol) were dissolved in acetonitrile (10 mL). PCl3
(1.63 mL, 18.7 mmol) was added carefully. The mixture was heated to
50 °C for 40 h, then cooled to rt, poured on ice, extracted with EtOAc,
washed with water, then brine, separated, dried (MgSO4), filtered,
and concentrated. The residue was triturated with MeOH to provide
8: 2.0 g (51%).
7ꢀ12; selectivity data for 1, 4, and 11. This material is available
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*Phone: +44 1304 644256. E-mail: lyn.jones@pfizer.com.
4-[1-(2,6-Difluorophenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indazol-
3-yloxy]piperidine-1-carboxylic Acid tert-Butyl Ester (9). 8
(5.0 g, 20 mmol) and 4-hydroxypiperidine-1-carboxylic acid tert-butyl
ester (4.0 g, 20 mmol) were dissolved in THF (100 mL). PPh3 (5.8 g,
22 mmol) and then DIAD (4.4 g, 22 mmol) were added. After 16 h, the
mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with water, then brine, sep-
arated, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated. The residue was puri-
fied by FCC (heptanes/EtOAc, 70/30) to provide 9: 8.7 g (76%).
1-(2,6-Difluorophenyl)-3-(piperidin-4-yloxy)-4,5,6,7-tetra-
hydro-1H-indazole Hydrochloride (10). 9 (6.6 g, 15.2 mmol) was
treated with HCl (4 M in dioxane, 20 mL, 80 mmol). After 1 h the sol-
vent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue triturated
with CH2Cl2 to provide 10: 5.0 g (99%).
3-Fluoro-2-[3-(piperidin-4-yloxy)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroinda-
zol-1-yl]phenol (11). 10 (5.0 g, 15 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane
(80 mL). Potassium tert-butoxide (6.8 g, 60 mmol) was added and the
mixture heated to reflux for 16 h. HCl (aq, 4 M in dioxane, 100 mL) was
added carefully and the solution refluxed for 2 h. The solvents were re-
moved under reduced pressure and the mixture partitioned between
EtOAc and saturated NaHCO3 (aq). The organic layer was washed with
water, then brine, separated, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated.
The mixture was triturated with diethyl ether, washed with cold methanol to
yield 11: 4.5 g (90%).
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Maria Stanley, Michele Coghlan, Matthew Strawbridge,
Malyn Asuncion, Mike Trevethick, Jessica Watson, Emilio Stewart,
and Richard Mold for pharmacological screening and David Fairman
and Rhys Jones for metabolic screening.
’ ABBREVIATIONS USED
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; COPD, chronic obstructive pul-
monary disease; DIAD, diisopropyl azodicarboxylate; DMSO,
dimethylsulfoxide; DoA, duration of action; EFS, electric field
stimulationn; ESCI, electrospray chemical ionization; FCC, flash
column chromatography; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; GPT,
guinea pig trachea; HLM, human liver microsome; LABA, long
acting β-2 agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist;
LCMS, liquid chromatographyꢀmass spectrometry; MABA,
muscarinic antagonistꢀβ2-agonist; nd, not determined; NET,
norepinephrin transporter; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance;
NMS, N-methylscopolamine; NRI, norepinephrin reuptake in-
hibitor; rt, room temperature; SAR, structureꢀactivity relation-
ship; THF, tetrahydrofuran; WLP, wide-ligand profile
3-Fluoro-2-{3-[1-(9-hydroxynonyl)piperidin-4-yloxy]-4,5,
6,7-tetrahydroindazol-1-yl}phenol (12). 11 (250 mg, 0.75 mmol),
9-bromononanol (168 mg, 0.75 mmol), and NaHCO3 (190 mg, 2.26 mmol)
were added to acetonitrile (20 mL) and heated at relux for 16 h. The sol-
vents were removed under reduced pressure, and the mixture was parti-
tioned between EtOAc and water. The organic layer was separated, dried
(MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated to provide 12: 320 mg (90%).
5-[2-(9-{4-[1-(2-Fluoro-6-hydroxyphenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-
1H-indazol-3-yloxy]piperidin-1-yl}nonylamino)-1-hydroxy-
ethyl]-8-hydroxy-1H-quinolin-2-one (13). 12 (160 mg, 0.34 mmol)
was dissolved in DMSO (5 mL). Then NEt3 (470 μL, 3.38 mmol) and
sulfur trioxideꢀpyridine complex (215 mg, 1.35 mmol) were added. The
mixture was stirred for 16 h. The mixture was partitioned between EtOAc
and water. The organic layer was washed with brine, separated, dried
(MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated. The crude aldehyde was dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (9mL) andEtOH(1mL), andtheamine144e wasadded(106mg,
0.32 mmol). NaB(OAc)3H (201 mg, 0.95 mmol) was added and the mix-
ture stirred for 16 h. The solvents were removed under reduced pressure,
and the residue was partitioned between EtOAc and water. The organic
layer was separated, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated. The crude
’ REFERENCES
(2) Cazzola, M.; Molimard, M. The scientific rationale for combin-
ing long-acting β-2 agonists and muscarinic antagonists in COPD.
Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 23, 257–267.
(3) Welte, T. Optimising treatment for COPD—new strategies for
combination therapy. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2009, 63, 1136–1149.
(4) (a) Ray, N.; Alcaraz, L. Muscarinic antagonist-β-adrenergic
agonist dual pharmacology molecules as bronchodilators: a patent
review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2009, 19, 1–12. (b) Cazzola, M.; Matera,
M. Novel long-acting bronchodilators for COPD and asthma. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 291–299. (c) Jones, L. H.; Baldock, H.; Bunnage,
M.; Burrows, J.; Clarke, N.; Coghlan, M.; Entwistle, D.; Fairman, D.;
Feeder, N.; Fulton, C.; Hilton, L.; James, K.; Jones, R.; Kenyon, A.;
Marshall, S.; Newman, S.; Osborne, R.; Patel, S.; Selby, M.; Stuart, E.;
Trevethick, M.; Wright, K.; Price, D. Inhalation by design: dual
pharmacology β-2 agonists/M3 antagonists for the treatment of COPD.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 2759–2763. (d) Hughes, A.; Chin, K.;
Dunham, S.; Jasper, J.; King, K.; Lee, T.; Mammen, M.; Martin, J.;
Steinfeld, T. Discovery of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist
and beta 2 adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) dual pharmacology mole-
cules. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 1354–1358. (e) Mammen, M.;
Dunham, S.; Hughes, A.; Tae, W.; Husfeld, C.; Stangeland, E. Biphenyl
Derivatives. US 20040167167, 2004. (f) Jones, L. H.; Lunn, G.; Price, D.
Sulfonamide Derivatives as Adrenergic Agonists and Muscarinic Antago-
nists. WO 2008041095, 2008.
adduct was dissolved in THF (10 mL). NEt3 3HF (255 mg, 1.58 mmol)
3
was added and the mixture stirred for 16 h. The mixture was partitioned
between EtOAc and water, and the organic layer was separated and con-
centrated. The residue was purified by FCC (CH2Cl2/MeOH/NH3 (aq)
80/20/2) to provide 13: 25 mg (11% over three steps). 1HNMR(CD3OD,
400 MHz) δ1.20ꢀ1.45 (m, 10H), 1.47ꢀ1.64(m,4H), 1.65ꢀ1.91(m, 6H),
2.05 (m, 2H), 2.28ꢀ2.46 (m, 8H), 2.78ꢀ2.90 (m, 4H), 3.00 (m, 2H), 4.58
(m, 1H), 5.27 (m, 1H), 6.63ꢀ6.74 (m, 2H), 6.78 (m, 1H), 6.97 (m, 1H),
7.20ꢀ7.29 (m, 2H), 8.37 (m, 1H); LCMS m/z 676 (M + H)+, >95% pure.
catalog.asp.
(6) Schelkun, R. M.; Yuen, P.-W. Therapeutic Pyrazolo[3,4-b]-
pyridines and Indazoles. WO 2006056873, 2006.
7001
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm2007535 |J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 6998–7002