generate alkyl free radical intermediates.8,9 Visible light-
mediated photoredox catalysis is particularly attractive as
the reaction occurs under mild conditions, requiring low
catalyst loadings, and offering good functional group
tolerance and chemoselectivity. In addition, the synthetic
community has long recognized the importance of acces-
sing significant molecular complexity in a single step from
relatively simple starting materials.10 One means of accom-
plishing thisgoalisthroughthoughtful design ofsubstrates
and the use of cascade reactions. Herein, we report the
application of photoredox catalysis to afford fused tricyc-
lic molecular architectures from simple, functionalized
cyclopropane starting materials.
Scheme 2. Access to VCPs and Observed Reactivity
the fused tricyclic pyrrolidinone was generated as the
major product in 52% yield after 12 h. When the reaction
was run at elevated temperature, 40 °C, the yield of the
tricycle improved to 69% (Scheme 2B). In this case, heating
of the reaction medium required only surrounding the
reaction vessel and CFL with aluminum foil and relying
on the light source to heat the medium.17 Furthermore, it is
noteworthy that this transformation results in the generation
of two new ring structures bearing valuable chemical motifs,
specifically a diarylmethane18 and fused pyrrolidinone.19
The substrate scope of this transformation is quite
broad, as demonstrated in Table 1. The reaction is insensi-
tive to substitution about the aryl ring. Both electron-rich
and -deficient aromatic rings undergo the tandem reaction
sequence efficiently. In addition, utilization of trans-1,2-
diaryl substituted cyclopropanes allows access to the com-
plementary regioisomer of the tricyclic product (Table 1,
entries 6À8). Furthermore, tertiary amides having one
propargyl group afforded the rearranged compound in
low yields, due tothe inability of one of the conformational
isomers to undergo the initial cyclization (entry 9). Finally,
diastereomerically pure substrates having differentially
substituted aromatic rings provided a 1:1 mixture of the
constitutional isomers of the rearranged product (entry
10). This is a reflection of the lack of diastereoselectivity of
the radical cyclization step.
Scheme 1. Photoredox Catalysis: Rapid Generation of Plat-
forms for Diversity and Reaction Discovery
We have recently reported the development of a general
radical cyclization reaction, wherein an alkyl radical is
generated via the single electron reduction of alkyl halides.
In this work, we observed efficient formation of com-
pounds which we hypothesized had great potential for
use as a platform for molecular diversity and reaction
discovery,11 in particular bromocyclopropanes and vinyl-
cyclopropanes (VCPs) (Scheme 1).12,13 With this in mind,
we observed that heating of 214 in toluene induced a retro-
ene fragmentation of the cyclopropane ring to afford 3 in
99% yield (Scheme 2A).15 This type of reaction profile is
typical of alkyl substituted VCPs and is often encountered
as an undesired transformation, particularly in the VCP/
cyclopentene rearrangement.16 Therefore, we synthesized
4 in an effort to suppress this retro-ene pathway. Upon
subjecting 4 to the photoredox cyclization conditions,
including irradiation by a household compact fluorescent
lamp (CFL) at room temperature, we observed only trace
amounts of the corresponding VCP product (6). Instead,
In addition to this observed reactivity, subtle structural
changes to the reaction scaffold afforded varied types of
transformations. For instance, an interesting mode of
reactivity was observed when subjecting the corresponding
secondary amide, 7a, and propargyl ester, 7b, to the
optimized reaction conditions. Compounds of this type
have a thermodynamic bias to adopt the (Z) conformation
about the amide/ester bond.20 As a result, they are less
(10) Newhouse, T.; Baran, P. S.; Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2009, 38, 3010.
(11) Beeler, A. B.; Su, S.; Singleton, C. A.; Porco, J. A., Jr. J. Am.
(17) See the Supporting Information for details.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1413.
(18) (a) Wai, J. S.; Egbertson, M. S.; Payne, L. S.; Fisher, T. E.;
Embrey, M. W.; Tran, L. O.; Melamed, J. Y.; Langford, H. M.; Guare,
J. P., Jr.; Zhuang, L.; Grey, V. E.; Vacca, J. P.; Holloway, M. K.; Naylor-
Olsen, A. M.; Hazuda, D. J.; Felock, P. J.; Wolfe, A. L.; Stillmock,
K. A.; Schleif, W. A.; Gabryelski, L. J.; Yong, S. D. J. Med. Chem. 2000,
43, 4923. (b) Long, Y.-Q.; Jiang, X.-H.; Dayam, R.; Sanchez, T.;
Shoemaker, R.; Sei, S.; Neamati, N. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2561.
(19) For examples of biologically acive pyrrolidinones, see: (a) Dwoskin,
L. P.; Teng, L.; Buxton, S. T.; Crooks, P. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999,
288, 905. (b) Winblad, B. CNS Drug Rev. 2005, 11, 169.
(12) For examples of coupling reaction of cyclopropanes see:
(a) Piers, E.; Jean, M.; Marrs, P. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5075.
(b) Charette, A. B.; Giroux, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8718.
(13) For selected reviews on the reactivity of vinylcyclopropanes, see:
(a) Wender, P. A.; Bi, F. C.; Gamber, G. G.; Gosselin, F.; Hubbard,
R. D.; Scanio, M. J. C.; Sun, R.; Williams, T. J.; Zhang, L. Pure Appl.
Chem. 2002, 74, 25. (b) Baldwin, J. E. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1197.
(14) Tucker, J. W.; Nguyen, J. D.; Narayanam, J. M. R.; Krabbe,
S. W.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 4985.
(15) (a) Nakamura, E.; Kubota, K.; Isaka, M. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
5809. (b) Lin, Y.-L.; Turos, E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8751.
(16) Hudlicky, T.; Koszyk, F. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 2487.
€
(20) (a) Blom, C. E.; Gunthard, H. H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 84,
267. (b) Schnur, D. M.; Yuh, Y. H.; Dalton, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 3779.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 20, 2011
5469