5310
C. Liao et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 5308–5310
Scheme 5. Deuterium exchange reaction of 9.
stability include the deuterium exchange reaction and the methyl-
ation with methyl iodide after deprotonation with a strong base
such as sodium hydride.17b Both reactions reflect the acidity of
the protons at the possible reactive sites such as C-2, C-4, C-5,
and ꢀCH3 on C-2.21 We carried out deuterium exchange reactions
in both neutral and strongly basic condition. The reaction was con-
ducted in a NMR tube containing a mixture of 1 M ionic liquid in
0.5 mL CD3OD. Since the C2-subsituted ionic liquids are less sus-
ceptible to exchange, it is not surprising that neither of the stable
ionic liquids underwent any detectable deuterium exchange under
neutral condition. To further test their stability, KOH powder
(0.5 mmol) was added to the above solutions and the disappear-
ance of the 1H signal was followed as a function of reaction time.
We observed an uneven deuteration on the three types of protons
in IL 9 and 11. The deuterium exchange occurred on the protons at
C-4, and C-5, as well as in ꢀCH3 (or ꢀCH2OCH2CH2CH2CH3) at C-2,
as shown in Scheme 5 using IL 9 as an example. Under the strong
basic condition, both IL 9 and 11 underwent fast deuteration on the
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s
Office of Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Sciences and
Engineering, under contract with UT-Battelle, LLC. C.L. acknowl-
edges Professor Robert C. Corcoran at University of Wyoming for
helpful discussions.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Walder, P. Bull. Acad. Imper. Sci. 1914, 1, 1800.
2. Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071.
3. Antonietti, M.; Kuang, D.; Smarsly, B.; Zhou, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
4988.
4. Han, X.; Armstrong, D. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1079.
5. Garcia, B.; Lavallée, S.; Perron, G.; Michot, C.; Armand, M. Electrochim. Acta
2004, 49, 4583.
6. Galinski, M.; Lewandowski, A.; Stepniak, I. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 5567.
7. Wilkes, J. S.; Zaworotko, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 965.
8. (a) Visser, A. E.; Swatloski, R. P.; Reichert, W. M.; Mayton, R.; Sheff, S.;
Wierzbicki, A.; Davis, J. J. H.; Rogers, R. D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 135; (b)
Harjani, J. R.; Friscic, T.; MacGillivray, L. R.; Singer, R. D. Dalton Trans. 2008,
4595.
a-protons in the C-2 substituents (ꢀCH3 and ꢀCH2OCH2CH2-
CH2CH3). IL 9 showed significantly faster deuteration rate on the
protons at the C-4 and C-5 positions, with 90% deuterated in
approximately an hour (Fig. S12, Supporting Information). On the
contrast, the deuteration of the protons at the C-4 and C-5 posi-
tions in IL 11 was much slower, with only 9% deuterated during
the first hour. (Figure S1, Supporting Information) This suggests
that the substitution of ꢀCH2OCH2CH2CH2CH3 at the C-2 position
has strong electronic effects on the imidazolium ring so that the
CꢀH bonds at the C-4 and C-5 positions are significantly weakened.
No detectable deuteration was observed in IL 10; instead, upon
strong base addition (potassium hydroxide), a precipitation in deu-
terated methanol was obtained. As confirmed by 1H NMR, the pre-
cipitation is the OHꢀ metathesis product of IL 10. The ꢀCN
substitution at the C-2 position significantly enhanced the stability
of the protons at the C-4 and C-5 positions. As demonstrated in the
above examples, the electronic effects of the substituents at the C-
2 position played a key role in defining the reactivity of the ionic
liquids.
9. Lee, S. G. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1049.
10. Seki, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Miyashiro, H.; Ohno, Y.; Usami, A.; Mita, Y.; Kihira, N.;
Watanabe, M.; Terada, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 10228.
11. Whitten, J. P.; Mccarthy, J. R.; Matthews, D. P. Synthesis 1988, 470.
12. Nguyen, D. Q.; Bae, H. W.; Jeon, E. H.; Lee, J. S.; Cheong, M.; Kim, H.; Kim, H. S.;
Lee, H. J. Power Sources 2008, 183, 303.
13. Kim, H.; Nguyen, D. Q.; Bae, H. W.; Lee, J. S.; Cho, B. W.; Kim, H. S.; Cheong, M.;
Lee, H. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 1761.
14. Brown, R. S.; Slebocka-Tilk, H.; Buschek, J. M.; Ulan, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106, 5979.
15. Arduengo, A. J.; Dias, H. V. R.; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
5530.
16. Aggarwal, V. K.; Emme, I.; Mereu, A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1612.
17. (a) Cheng, J.-Y.; Chu, Y.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1575; (b) Kan, H.-C.;
Tseng, M.-C.; Chu, Y.-H. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1644.
18. Hsieh, Y.-N.; Kuei, C.-H.; Chou, Y.-K.; Liu, C.-C.; Leu, K.-L.; Yang, T.-H.; Wang,
M.-Y.; Ho, W.-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3666.
19. Lu, J. M.; Yan, F.; Texter, J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 431.
20. Lee, J. S.; Wang, X.; Luo, H.; Baker, G. A.; Dai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4596.
21. Handy, S. T.; Okello, M. J. Org. Chem 2005, 70, 1915.
In conclusion we have synthesized three different types of
imidazoles and their ionic liquids. Depending on their C-2 substit-
uents, the imidazoles can be used as monomers for polymerization,
precursors for moisture-sensitive and air stable ionic liquids.