was the respective 1,2-DHP. The order of initial rates were
4-Cl > H > 4-Me > 3,4-dimethoxy = 4-methoxy, indicat-
ingatrendwhereingreaterelectrondeficiencyatthefulvene
6-position enhances attack by the nucleophile (vide infra).
In the aliphatic series (6-alkyl or 6,6-dialkyl), a similar
study revealed that steric factors affect the 1,2-DHP for-
mation rates. Whereas after 1 h 6-methyl- and 6-ethylful-
venes were completely consumed togive the corresponding
1,2-DHPs, the conversion of 6-isopropyl derivative was
only 25%. 6,6-Dimethylfulvene was reacted much more
slowly than the 6-monosubstituted analogues and also
gave rise to 2-isopropenyl-6,6-dimethylfulvene.
Scheme 2. Mechanism of Fulveneꢀenamine [6 þ 2] Cycloaddition
The 6-cyclopentylidene derivative 1k did not give any
1,2-DHP; instead, product 4 was isolated from this reac-
tion. The formation of 311 and 4 presumably arises from
initial base-catalyzed isomerization to alkenylcyclopenta-
dienide followed by condensation with acetone, respec-
tively. The tendencey of 1k to undergo facile isomerization
to cyclopent-1-enylcyclopentadiene has also been noted by
Scheme 3. Condensation of 1j with Acetone-d6 and Pyrrolidine
Alder and Ruhmann, as well as Nair et al.12 On the basis of
€
the studies described above, a plausible multistep mechan-
ism emerges, consistent with our results. The 1,2-dihydro-
pentalenes arise from a formal [6 þ 2] cycloaddition of a
fulvene with 1-isopropenylpyrrolidine 5,13 formed in situ
from acetone and pyrrolidine. Nucleophilic attack at
fulvene C-6 (the most electrophilic site in fulvenes, as
documented in various examples)14 gives rise to a zwitter-
ionic intermediate incorporating a cyclopentadienyl anion
and an iminium ion. The latter species cyclizes to a bicyclo-
[3.3.0]octadienyl derivative before eliminating pyrrolidine
to give the final product (Scheme 2).
In order to exclude the possibility of a 1-isopropenylfulvene
formation followed by an 8π-electrocyclization to give the
1,2-DHP, we conducted the reaction of 1i in acetone-d6
with catalytic base.
The 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture clearly
showed that the signal for the C-2 protons (dihydropen-
talene numbering) in 2i at 2.9 ppm, now a CD2 group, had
disappeared (Scheme 3); likewise, the C-6 methyl groups
in 3 were also not visible, confirming the mechanism
proposed in Scheme 2.
On an interesting note, 1,4-diphenylcyclopentadiene
under the same conditions (acetone solvent/pyrrolidine
catalyst) underwent a tandem condensation with acetone
and subsequent dihydropentalene formation to give 11
(Scheme 4).
Obviously, the condensation with acetone did not take
place at the position between the phenyl groups. The
intermediate fulvene 10 was not isolated; under the condi-
tions, it underwent attack by 5 to give the 1,2-DHP
derivative 11. Similarly, the direct condensation of 1,3-
cyclopentadiene in acetone solution in the presence of
catalytic pyrrolidine led to the same mixture as obtained
from 1i by way of a domino condensation with acetone.
Scheme 4. One-Pot Fulveneꢀ1,2-DHP Formation from 9
(10) (a) Jaffe, H. H. Chem. Rev. 1953, 53, 191–261. (b) Hansch, C.;
Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. (c) March, J.
Advanced Organic Chemistry Reactions Mechanism and Structure, 3rd
ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1985; p 244.
(11) (a) Fenton, D. M.; Hurwitz, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 1646–
1651. (b) Weyschardt, H.; Plenio, H. Organometallics 2008, 27, 1479–
1485. (c) Smith, W. B.; Gonzales, C. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 3541–3542.
(12) (a) Alder, K.; Ruhmann, R. Justus Liebigs Ann. 1950, 566, 1–27.
(b) Nair, V.; Nair, J. S.; Kumar, S.; Rath, N. P.; Williard, P. G.;
Eigendorf, G. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 460–4606.
The scope and limitations of the 1,2-DHP synthesis were
also studied. The use of methyl isopropyl ketone, aceto-
phenone, and cyclopentanone in the presence of pyrroli-
dine did not result in 1,2-DHP formation. Likewise,
increased steric bulk at C-6 in the starting fulvene impeded
fulvene formation, e.g., fulvenes derived from cyclopropyl
methyl ketone or p-methylacetophenone were also unreac-
tive toward acetone/pyrrolidine. However, the use of a pre-
formed enamine, i.e., 1-pyrrolidino-1-cyclopentene with1c
gave a mixture of the corresponding [6 þ 2] cycloadducts
12a and b; pyrrolidine did not eliminate spontaneously in
these cases. Preliminary results show that treatment of 1c
(13) The progress of the reactions was monitored by 1H NMR; in
each case, the presence of in situ formed enamine 5 was detected, as
confirmed by comparison of its 1H NMR signals (CDCl3) with those of a
sample formed in situ from acetone and pyrrolidine. The vinyl protons
have characteristic peaks (narrow multiplets) at δ 4.74 and 4.62 ppm in
the 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures as well as a mixture
of pyrrolidine and acetone which we ascribe to the methylene protons in
5.
(14) (a) Yates, P. Fulvenes. In Advanced Alicyclic Chemistry; Aca-
demic Press: New York, 1968; Vol. 2, pp 59ꢀ184. (b) Zeller, K. P.
Pentafulvenes. Methoden Org. Chem. (Houben-Weyl) 1985, 5/2C,
504–684. (c) Neuenschwander, M. Fulvenes. In The Chemistry of
Double-Bonded Functional Groups, Supplement A; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley:
New York, 1989, pp 1131ꢀ1268. (d) Buchi, G.; Decorzant, D. B. R.;
Grieder, A.; Hauser, A. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3208–3209.
5954
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 22, 2011