phthalic anhydride.4,7 Furthermore, nonsymmetric substi-
tution of the phenyl ring is difficult due to formation of
regioisomers, severely limiting structureÀactivity relation-
ship (SAR) studies of APOs and related heteroaromatics.
Additionally, bulky amino groups are difficult to intro-
duce due to low nucleophilicity.
only 2 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 (entry 3). Lowering the
palladium/ligand ratio to 1:1.1 reduced the yield signifi-
cantly (entry 4). Several ligands were screened (entries 5À7),
indicating that bidentate ligands are essential, and XantPhos
is especially effective. A negative control experiment vali-
dated that a palladium catalyst is required (entry 8). DMSO
proved to be a highly effective solvent, affording the product
in quantitative yield (entry 13). The reaction was equally
efficient when the reaction time was reduced to just 5 min
(entry 14). Microwave irradiation proved clearly superior to
conventional heating (entry 15, preheated oil bath).15,16
After having defined the optimal catalytic system and
reaction conditions, we explored the scope of the reaction
(Scheme 2). In addition to aryl bromides, also aryl iodides
and triflates provided product 2a in excellent yields. Aryl
chlorides, however, proved to be less efficient coupling
partners. Both electron-donating and -withdrawing substi-
tuentsare tolerated on the aryl bromide (2bÀd), although a
5-nitro group did not provide an isolable amount of
product. The amino-substituted substrate 1c was not fully
consumed under the reaction conditions, and the remain-
ing starting material could be isolated. In the case of the
chloro-substituted substrate 1d, a more complex reaction
mixture was observed, presumably due to the competing
oxidative addition of the aryl chloride bond. Products 2c
and 2d are noteworthy, since they allow easy subsequent
modifications to increase molecular diversity. C5- and C6-
substituted APOs (2e, 2f) as well as a naphthalene-fused
derivative (2g) were obtained in excellent to quantitative
yields. The use of substituted hydrazines, however, proved
to be less straightforward. Replacing hydrazine monohy-
drate with phenylhydrazine under the standard conditions
did not lead to product formation. We argued that, since
hydrazine is both a reagent and base in this reaction, the
difference in basicity might be responsible for the observed
results. Accordingly, we examined the use of an additional
base and were delighted to observe product formation
using triethylamine as the base. After optimization we
obtained 2h in 63% yield using iPr2NH (3 equiv).16 Sub-
stitution on the methyl benzoate is still tolerated (2i, 2j),
although a strongly electron-donating methoxy group in
the ortho position decreases the yield. Interestingly, a
change in the electronic character of the aryl hydrazine
has a pronounced effect. Electron-poor para-trifluoro-
methylphenylhydrazine gives 2k in 37% yield, whereas
para-methoxyphenylhydrazine gave only trace amounts of
product. Methylhydrazine can be used, but product 2l was
obtained in poor yield (30%). These N-alkylated and
N-arylated APOs can alternatively be obtained from the
corresponding N-unsubstituted APOs.3
Scheme 1. MCR Approach toward 4-Aminophthalazinones
Palladium-catalyzed iminoacylation by isocyanide in-
sertion isanefficient butrelatively unexplored methodthat
offers significant advantages over the well-known carbon
monoxide insertions,9 such as an additional diversity point
for scaffold decoration and more practical handling.10 It is
therefore not surprising that interest in this field has
increased significantly recently.11 In light of our interest
in employing iminoacylation in palladium-catalyzed cascade
reactions,12,13 we envisioned an MCR approach toward
APOs starting from o-bromobenzoates (1), isocyanides,
and hydrazines (Scheme 1). Hydrazine is a challenging
coupling partner and has only very recently successfully
been used in the BuchwaldÀHartwig reaction.14 We
started our investigations using methyl o-bromobenzoate
(1a), tert-butyl isocyanide, and hydrazine monohydrate as
a benchmark reaction using Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %) and
XPhos (20 mol %), as the catalytic system, in DMF with
KOAc as the base,13 which did not result in any product
formation under conventional heating. Initial screenings
indicated that employing hydrazine asbotha reagent and a
convenient and cheap base under microwave irradiation
did furnish 2a in 30% yield (Table 1, entry 1). We were
pleased to find that dppf is a much better ligand than
XPhos (entry 2), providing the product in 55% yield with
(9) For Pd-catalyzed carbonylation reactions of aryl halides, see:
€
Brennfuhrer, A.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 4114.
(10) (a) Kosugi, M.; Ogata, T.; Tamura, H.; Sano, H.; Migita, T.
Chem. Lett. 1986, 15, 1197. (b) Saluste, C. G.; Whitby, R. J.; Furber, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4156. (c) Saluste, C. G.; Whitby, R. J.;
Furber, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6191. (d) Saluste, C. G.; Crumpler,
S.; Furber, M.; Whitby, R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6995. (e) Tetala,
K. K. R.; Whitby, R. J.; Light, M. E.; Hurtshouse, M. B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 6991.
The substrate tolerance of the isocyanide was examined
next, which unfortunately revealed that the reaction is
(11) (a) Tobisu, M.; Imoto, S.; Ito, S.; Chatani, N. J. Org. Chem.
2010, 75, 4835. (b) Jiang, H.; Liu, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, A.; Huang, H. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 1028. (c) Miura, T.; Nishida, Y.; Morimoto, M.;
Yamauchi, M.; Murakami, M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1429. (d) Wang,
Y.; Wang, H.; Peng, J.; Zhu, Q. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4604.
(12) For a review, see: Vlaar, T.; Ruijter, E.; Orru, R. V. A. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 809.
(15) The temperature in the reaction vessel may be lower than the
temperature of the oil bath, explaining the different conversions ob-
served. For a discussion of microwave heating vs conventional heating in
the Pd-catalyzed synthesis of heterocycles, see: Hostyn, S.; Maes,
B. U. W.; Van Baelen, G.; Gulevskaya, A.; Meyers, C.; Smits, K.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4676.
ꢀꢁ
(13) Van Baelen, G.; Kuijer, S.; Rycek, L.; Sergeyev, S.; Janssen, E.;
de Kanter, F. J. J.; Maes, B. U. W.; Ruijter, E.; Orru, R. V. A. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2011, 17, accepted. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201102468.
(14) Lundgren, R. J.; Stradiotto, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
8686.
(16) See the Supporting Information for additional optimization
data.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 24, 2011
6497