Scheme 1. Synthesis of (()-Dependensin
Scheme 3. Proposed Mechanism for Cycloaddition
The Fe-catalyzed reaction was utilized in the synthesis
of dependensin (5) via the homodimerization of 5,7,8-
trimethoxyflav-3-ene 4, easily prepared in three steps
from commercially available starting materials. Depen-
densin has been previously synthesized11 in a similar
fashion with our route demonstrating a reduction in reac-
tion sequence steps in high stereocontrol (Scheme 1).
Subjecting 5,7,8-trimethoxy-3-flavene 4 to the optimized
FeCl3-dimerization conditions afforded (()-dependensin
(5) as a single diastereomer in 29% overall yield from
1,2,3,5-tetramethoxybenzene.
E-conformer under the reaction conditions (E)-7-D.14 The
second 2H-chromene undergoes a hydride shift to yield the
40-methoxy-2-flavene 6-D as the reactive dienophile.15
Cycloaddition of the E-configured vinyl oQM (E)-7-D
and 6-D in an inverse electron demand [4 þ 2] fashion
furnishes the dimer 2-D. The chemoselectivity observed in
the 40,7-dimethoxy-3-flavene 1f dimerization (Table 2, en-
try 7) is rationalized by a [4 þ 2] cycloaddition of a highly
electron-rich olefin with the oQM at a faster rate than the
hydride shift.
We proposed further experiments based on our mechan-
istic hypothesis aimed at the heterodimerization process.
We first postulated that 40-methoxy-2-flavene 6 would
react with the oQM generated in situ from 2H-chromene
1hunder the Fe-promoted conditions (Scheme 4, reaction 1).
The reaction proceeded well yielding the corresponding
heterodimer 9h in high yield and 4:1 diastereoselectivity,
with only trace amounts (<5%) of homodimer 3h formed.
We demonstrated the intermediacy of the oQM by making
(E)-8 and reacting it with dienophile 6 under the same
reaction conditions (Scheme 4, reaction 2).16 The product
was isolated in comparable yield and the same diastereos-
electivity to provide further evidence for the intermediacy
of both reaction partners in the [4 þ 2] cycloaddition
pathway.
We envisaged a cyloaddition processes to occur with
electron-rich dienophiles utilizing 2H-chromenes as oQM
precursors based on our preliminary studies of the
reaction.17 Inspired by natural products such as the mul-
berrofurans and australisine we first evaluated hetero-
DielsꢀAlder reactions between 2H-chromenes 1 and 40-
methoxy-2-flavenes 6 under the Fe-promoted conditions.
The reactions proceeded well with 6-methyl and 1,3-
benzodioxol substituted chromenes 1b and 1j (Table 3,
entries 1 and 9). Electron-deficient 2H-chromenes 1cꢀ1e
were also able to participate, but at a slower rate (entries 2ꢀ4).
Scheme 2. Deuterium-Labeled 1a in the Homodimerization
We designed experiments to gain insight into the reac-
tion sequence leading to the dimerization product. We
postulated use of 2-deutero-40-methoxyflav-3-ene 1-D in
the dimerization reaction would illustrate the isomeriza-
tion of the chromene to the dienophile. The chromene 1-D
was synthesized via boronate addition onto the deuterated
2-ethoxy-2H-chromene. Subjecting 1-D to the dimeriza-
tion conditions led to the formation of dimer 2-D, epimeric
at the benzylic positions (Scheme 2). Under UV irradia-
tion, oxa-6π rearrangement of chromenes12 results in the
formation of the corresponding ortho-quinone methide
(oQM).13 We propose the similar oxa-6π rearrangement
of 2H-chromene could occur under Fe-catalyzed condi-
tions. Illustrated in Scheme 3, the Fe-catalyst is responsible
for promoting the hydride shift to yield the dienophile and
the ring-opening reaction.
The ring-opening process can lead to the formation of
Z-ortho-quinone methide that rapidly equilibrates to the
(15) For similar hydride transfer, see: (a) McQuaid, K. M.; Long,
J. Z.; Sames, D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2972–2975. (b) McQuaid, K. M.;
Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 402–403.
(11) Deodhar, M.; Black, D. StC.; Kumar, N. Tetrahedron 2007, 63,
5227–5235.
(16) Jurd, L.; Roitman, J. N.; Wong, R. Y. Tetrahedron 1979, 35,
1041–1054.
(12) (a) Delbaere, S.; Micheau, J. C.; Vermeersch, G. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 8968–8973. (b) Padwa, A.; Lee, G. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1972, 795–796.
(13) Pathak, T. P.; Sigman, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 9210–9215.
(14) (a) Bishop, L. M.; Winkler, M.; Houk, K. N.; Bergman, R. G.;
Trauner, D. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5405–5408. (b) Jurd, L. Tetra-
hedron 1977, 33, 163–168.
(17) (a) Van de Water, R. W.; Pettus, T. R. R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
5367–5405. (b) Wu, K. L.; Mercado, E. V.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 6114–6117. (c) Marsini, M. A.; Huang, Y.; Lindsey, C.;
Wu, K. L.; Pettus, T. R. R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1477–1480. (d) Jensen,
K. H.; Webb, J. D.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17471–
17482. (e) Lumb, J. P.; Choong, K. C.; Trauner, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 9230–9231.
6482
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 24, 2011