As part of our general interest in the chemistry of
organoselenium compounds,13a we have recently reported
that the phenylselenyl group can be easily and intramolec-
ularly displaced by nitrogen nucleophiles, thus affording
substituted 1,3-oxazolin-2-ones13b and N-azetidines.13c
Herein, we report a versatile and stereoselective syn-
thetic route to 2-substituted THFs 4 (Scheme 1).
Scheme 2. Preparation of γ-Phenylseleno Ketones 1aÀc by
FriedelÀCrafts Acylation, Fries Rearrangement, and Acylation
of 2-Thienyl Lithium, Respectively
Scheme 1. General Strategy for the Stereospecific Synthesis of
2-Substituted Tetrahydrofurans
Our approach involves the direct intramolecular nucleo-
philic substitution of the phenylselenone group by the
oxygen atom of an alcohol 3, that is a formal 5-exo-
tet process. There are only two reports, to date, on the
intramolecular nucleophilic deselenenylation reaction for
the synthesis of 2-substituted THFs, both of them proceed-
ing via a selenonium salt intermediate.14
The phenylseleno alcohols 2 are uncommon organose-
lenium intermediates.15 We envisaged that they could
be easily and enantioselectively prepared by asymmetric
CBS-reduction of the corresponding γ-phenylseleno ke-
tones. In our hands, the oxazaborolidine-borane reduc-
tion16 of prochiral ketones 1 gave high level of enantioselec-
tivity in almost all the studied cases. Despite the extensive
research effort directed toward the synthesis of R- and
β-phenylseleno ketones,17 the synthesis of γ-phenylseleno
ketones 1 remains an unexplored area of research.18 In
this context, we have developed three different strategies
for the synthesis of compounds 1, starting all from
4-(phenylseleno)butanoic acid (5) (Scheme 2). Thus,
the acid 5 was reacted with oxalyl chloride to lead to
the corresponding acyl chloride 6 that was subjected to
the FriedelÀCrafts acylation reaction with anisole to give
ketone 1a in 71% overall yield. Ketone 1b was prepared by
an unprecedented approach based on the Fries rearrange-
ment of the ester intermediate of 5 to ketone 7 and
successive methylation of the free hydroxy group. We
explored, also, the quick and direct reaction of an organo-
metallic reagent such as thienyl lithium, with acyl chloride
6 (Scheme 2).19 As expected, ketone 1c was obtained in
low yield together with the alcohol 8. Due to the known
limitations of the above reaction, we directed our attention
to the reactions of 6 withoctyl magnesium bromide20 in the
presence of Fe(acac)3 or with lithium dibutylcuprate.21
Both of these reactions did not give appreciable results.
Furthermore, when we reacted (3-fluorophenyl)-(methyl)-
copper(I) magnesium bromide, a mixed magnesium
cuprate,22 with compound 6, the corresponding ketone 1d
was obtained in low yield (30%). Replacement of the
methyl group with the thienyl group as a dummy ligand
allowed the preparation of the new mixed magnesium
cuprate 9d (R = 3-fluorophenyl) that, reacting with 6,
led to ketone 1d in 83% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Therefore,
various mixed magnesium cuprates 9eÀh, capable of selec-
tively transferring the R group to the skeleton of acyl
chloride 6, were employed for the synthesis of ketones
1eÀh (Table 1, entries 2À5).
(10) (a) Wolfe, J. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 571. (b) Zhang, G.; Cui,
L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1474.
(11) Schmidt, B.; Pohler, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 2512.
(12) (a) Inoue, A.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. Synlett 1999, 1582. (b)
Singh, P. P.; Gudup, S.; Aruri, H.; Singh, U.; Ambala, S.; Yadav, M.;
Sawant, S. D.; Vishwakarma, R. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 1587.
(13) (a) Aversa, M. C.; Barattucci, A.; Bonaccorsi, P.; Temperini, A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 5668. (b) Tiecco, M.; Testaferri, L.; Temperini,
A.; Bagnoli, L.; Marini, F.; Santi, C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1752. (c)
Tiecco, M.; Testaferri, L.; Temperini, A.; Terlizzi, R.; Bagnoli, L.;
Marini, F.; Santi, C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 3510.
(14) (a) Sevrin, M.; Krief, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 585. (b)
Tingoli, M.; Testaferri, L.; Temperini, A.; Tiecco, M. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 7085.
The results reported in Table 1 show that functional
group tolerance, good yields, simplicity, and mildness of
(15) Clive, D. L. J.; Cheng, H. Chem. Commun. 2001, 605.
(16) Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 5551.
(17) Paulmier, C. Selenium Reagents and Intermediates in Organic
Synthesis; Pergamon: Oxford, 1986; Chapter 11.
(19) Dieter, R. K. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 4177.
(20) Fiandanese, V.; Marchese, G.; Martina, V.; Ronzini, L. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1984, 25, 485.
(21) Posner, G. H.; Whitten, C. E.; McFarland, P. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1972, 94, 5160.
(22) Bergbreiter, D. E.; Killough, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 2750.
(18) (a) Mastalerz, H.; Menard, M.; Vinet, V.; Desiderio, J.; Fung-Tomc,
J.; Kessler, R.; Tsai, Y. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1190. (b) Temperini, A.;
Terlizzi, R.; Testaferri, L.; Tiecco, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 7883.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX