groups on the aryl group of 2a and 2b is believed to prevent
room temperature on exposure to air. The addition of
degassed water into the C6D6 solution of 1a afforded 1-
hydroxy(mesityl)boryl-8-mesitylphosphinonaphthalene (5a)
in 93% yield.[14]
À
the formation of an intramolecular P B dative bond.
The reduction of 2c with magnesium metal in THF at
room temperature gave a mixture of two isomers, (E)-4c and
(Z)-4c, which can be considered as dimers of the correspond-
ing 1-phospha-2-boraacenaphthene 1c, in 35 and 53% yields,
respectively, upon isolation (Scheme 1).[15,16] Therefore, the
introduction of 3,5-tBu2C6H3 groups would not be suitable for
the synthesis and isolation of a 1-phospha-2-boraacenaph-
thene in the monomeric form. On the other hand, the
reduction of 2a and 2b with magnesium metal afforded 1a
and 1b as orange crystals in 91 and 67% yields, respectively,
upon isolation.[14] These results suggest it is necessary to have
a substituent at the ortho positions of the aryl groups on the
boron atom to isolate 1 as a stable compound. The monomeric
molecular structure of 1a was unambiguously determined by
X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 1).[17] The deviation of
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 1a, 1b, and
À
4c is shown in Scheme 2. At first, the P Cl bond of
dichlorophosphine 2 could be reduced with magnesium
Scheme 2. Plausible mechanism for the formation of 1 and 4 from 2
by aryl migration from the boron atom to the phosphorus atom.
metal to give borate 8. Then, one of the two aryl groups on
the boron atom in 8 migrates to the phosphorus atom to
afford 1-phospha-2-boraacenaphthenes 1, together with the
elimination of MgCl2. Compounds 1a and 1b bearing mesityl
or 2,6-dimethylphenyl were isolated as monomers, while 1c
bearing 3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl groups is believed to undergo
ready head-to-tail dimerization, thus leading to the formation
of (E)-4c or (Z)-4c. When a 1:1 mixture of 2a and 2b was
reduced under the same reaction conditions as used for the
synthesis of 1, compounds 1a and 1b were obtained in a 1:1
ratio without the formation of any crossover product, as
1
determined by the H and 31P NMR spectra, thus suggesting
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 1a with thermal ellipsoids set at 50%
probability. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond
lengths [ꢀ], angles [deg], and dihedral angles [deg]: P(1)–B(1)
1.889(3), P(1)–C(1) 1.817(3), B(1)–C(9) 1.582(4); P(1)-C(1)-C(10)
108.59(17), B(1)-C(9)-C(10) 113.6(2), P(1)-C(1)···C(9)-B(1) 10.24(14).
the intramolecular migration of the aryl group in these
reactions.[14]
It is worth noting that compound 1a was found to be
orange in color, both in the crystalline form and in solution, in
contrast to the previously reported phosphinoboranes, which
were colorless or yellow crystals. Furthermore, 1a exhibited
weak but apparent orange emission in solution. Thus, we
measured the cyclic voltammetry, UV/Vis, and emission
spectra of 1a to clarify the influence of the rigid geometry
the phosphorus atom from the naphthalene plane is 0.36 ꢀ,
while the boron atom is located on the same plane as
naphthalene (Figure 1b). The sum of the bond angles around
the phosphorus and boron atoms are 328.4(3)8 and 359.5(6)8,
respectively, thus confirming the pyramidal (phosphorus) and
À
of the structure comprising of the P B bond and the naphthyl
moiety, to the electrochemical and photophysical properties
À
trigonal planar (boron) geometries. The P B bond length in
1a is 1.889(3) ꢀ, which is slightly longer than those in
Mes2PBMes2 (6; 1.839(8) ꢀ) and Ph2PBMes2 (7;
1.859(3) ꢀ).[11] The 11B NMR spectra of 1a and 1b in C6D6
showed broad signals at dB = 77.9 ppm (Dn1/2 = 1400 Hz) for
1a and dB = 77.8 ppm (Dn1/2 = 930 Hz) for 1b, thus suggesting
a trigonal planar geometry around the boron atom in solution.
These values are similar to those of 6 (dB = 82.4 ppm) and 7
(dB = 70.9 ppm).[11] On the other hand, the 31P NMR signals,
observed at dP = À28.2 ppm (1a) and dP = À27.7 ppm (1b),
were shifted relatively upfield compared to the signals of 6
(dP = 27.4 ppm) and 7 (dP = 26.7 ppm),[11] probably due to the
different geometries of the phosphorus atoms. That is, 1a
exhibits the pyramidal geometry, and 6 exhibits almost planar
geometry.[8a] 1-Phospha-2-boraacenaphthenes 1a and 1b were
stable under an inert atmosphere even on heating at 1008C
(C6D6 solution, sealed tube) for 24 h, but they underwent
decomposition within three hours in dilute C6D6 solution at
of 1a.[18]
While 1a showed an irreversible oxidation wave at Epa =+
0.65 V (versus Fc/Fc+; Fc = ferrocene; Figure S1 in the
Supporting Information), a reversible one-electron reduction
couple was observed at E1/2 = À2.22 V together with an
irreversible reduction wave at Epc = À3.28 V (versus Fc/Fc+;
Figure S2 in the Supporting Information).[14] The first reduc-
tion occurred at a less-negative region than that of dimesi-
tyl(1-naphthyl)borane (9; E1/2 = À2.51 V and Epc = À3.30 V)
under the same reaction conditions.[19] The less-negative
reduction potential of 1a compared to that of 9 is probably
due to the very effective pp–p* conjugation between the
naphthyl unit and the vacant p orbital of the boron atom; this
conjugation could be a result of the rigid conformation,
À
caused by the P B bond attached to the naphthyl unit.
The UV/Vis spectra of 1a in hexane, THF, and CH2Cl2
solutions were similar to each other (Figure 2). In all cases,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10940 –10943
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim