Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
(14) (a) Whitelaw, E. L.; Loraine, G.; Mahon, M. F.; Jones, M. D.
Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 11469. (b) dos Santos Vieira, I.; Whitelaw, E. L.;
Jones, M. D.; Herres-Pawlis, S. Chem.Eur. J. 2013, 19, 4712.
(c) Hancock, S. L.; Mahon, M. F.; Jones, M. D. Dalton Trans. 2013,
42, 9279.
(15) For salalen complexes of other metals employed for lactide
polymerization see: (a) Whitelaw, E. L.; Jones, M. D.; Mahon, M. F.
Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 7176. (b) Whitelaw, E. L.; Davidson, M. G.;
Jones, M. D. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10004. (c) Nie, K.; Gu, W.; Yao,
Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Q. Organometallics 2013, 32, 2608.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Detailed experiments protocols, kinetics data and tetrad
distribution analysis; CCDC 950722 with crystallographic data.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
■
S
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
(16) Ovitt, T. M.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1316.
(17) Polymerization of meso-LA with (R)-3b and with rac-3b led to
syndiotactically and heterotactically inclined PLA’s, respectively (SI).
The formation of syndiotactic-PLA is governed by homochiral
preference of an SCM control mechanism, and is consistent with the
prevalence of this mechanism at the early stages of rac-LA polymer-
ization. Polymeryl exhange between propagating species is degenerate
for an enantiomerically pure catalyst. This degeneracy is lifted for the
racemic catalyst. The observed reversal of tacticity to heterotactic is an
unequivocal support for polymeryl exchange between enantiomorphous
metal centers.16
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
Dedicated to Prof. Adolfo Zambelli on the occasion of his 80th
birthday. We thank Ilaria D’Auria for GPC measurements,
Patrizia Oliva for NMR technical assistance, Fabia Grisi for GC
measurements and Vincenzo Venditto for PLA characterization.
M.K. thanks the Israel Science Foundation and “Shikun & Binui”
for support. We thank Purac for a generous gift of lactides.
(18) Homodecoupled 1H NMR spectra of the PLA samples obtained
from enantiopure monomers (D- and L-LA) were perfectly isotactic
testifying that no epimerization reactions occur.
(19) Du, H.; Velders, A. H.; Dijkstra, P. J.; Sun, J.; Zhong, Z.; Chen, X.;
Feijen, J. Chem.Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9836.
REFERENCES
■
(20) As expected, the PLA obtained with rac-3b (run 6, Table 1) was
not optically active, whereas a polymeric sample obtained by (R)-3b in
the same conditions of run 10 (conversion 90%) showed an [α]D25 of +8
indicating that this catalyst preferentially polymerizes the D-LA
enantiomer.
(1) Platel, R. H.; Hodgson, L. M.; Williams, C. K. Polym. Rev. 2008, 48,
11.
(2) O’Keefe, B. J.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Tolman, W. B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 2001, 2215.
(3) (a) Mecking, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1078.
(b) Ragauskas, A. J.; Williams, C. K.; Davison, B. H.; Britovsek, G.;
Cairney, J.; Eckert, C. A.; Frederick, W. J.; Hallett, J. P.; Leak, D. J.;
Liotta, C. L.; Mielenz, J. R.; Murphy, R.; Templer, R.; Tschaplinski, T.
Science 2006, 311, 484.
(4) (a) Thomas, C. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 165. (b) Stanford, M.
J.; Dove, A. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 486. (c) Dijkstra, P. J.; Du, H.;
Feijen, J. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 520.
(5) Hormnirum, P.; Marshall, E. L.; Gibson, V. C.; Pugh, R. I.; White,
A. J. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 15343.
(6) (a) Spassky, N.; Wisniewski, M.; Pluta, C.; Le Borgne, A. Macromol.
Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 2627. (b) Wisniewski, M.; Le Borgne, A.;
Spassky, N. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1997, 198, 1227.
(21) Reactivity ratios may also be established by chiral GC analysis of
unreacted monomer. To further validate the data in Table 2, rac-LA was
polymerized with (S)-3b until 75% conversion, the polymerization was
quenched by precipitation, the remaining lactide was isolated by
sublimation, and the PLA formed was analyzed by polarimetry. The
enantiomeric excess of the unreacted lactide was 34% according to chiral
GC analysis, and 33% according to a calculation based on the optical
activity of the polymer (SI).
(22) Kagan’s equation: s = ln[1 − c(1 + ee)]/ln[1 − c(1 − ee)] where c
is the fraction conversion and ee is the enantiomeric excess.
(23) (a) Zhong, Z.; Dijkstra, P. J.; Feijen, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 4510. (b) Zhong, Z.; Dijkstra, P. J.; Feijen, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 11291.
(24) See also: (a) Chisholm, M. H.; Patmore, N. J.; Zhou, Z. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 127. (b) Chisholm, M. H.; Gallucci, J. C.; Quisenberry,
K. T.; Zhou, Z. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 2613.
(25) SCM and CEM mechanisms may play varying roles in any
stereoregular polymerization. For a mechanistic study of their interplay
in lactide polymerization see refs 7b and 24b.
(26) Preliminary characterization of a gradient isotactic multiblock
PLA sample revealed that it was crystalline. X-ray spectral analysis of a
raw polymer sample and a polymer sample obtained by casting from
DMF solution corresponded to stereocomplex PLA. The Tm of these
two samples was 161 °C (ΔH = 25 J/g) and 165 °C (ΔH = 31 J/g).
These values are lower than those obtained for stereocomplex-PLA
obtained by mixing enantiomerically pure PLLA and PDLA, due to the
higher degree of stereoerrors/block lengths in the sample (SI).
(27) Polymerizations of 75:25 and 25:75 L-/D-LA mixtures carried out
to 43% conversion yielded polymers with different optical activities,
different distribution of stereoerrors, and different degrees of
crystallinity, consistent with the CEM and SCM mechanisms preferring
either the same or the opposite enantiomer (SI).
(7) (a) Nomura, N.; Ishii, R.; Akakura, M.; Aoi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 5938. (b) Nomura, N.; Ishii, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kondo, T.
Chem.Eur. J. 2007, 13, 4433.
(8) Hormnirun, P.; Marshall, E. L.; Gibson, V. C.; White, A. J. P.;
Williams, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2688.
(9) Gradient copolymer usually refers to a copolymer composed of two
different repeat units of exchanging ratios along the chain, which may
have a multiblock microstructure. See: (a) Matyjaszewski, K.; Ziegler,
M. J.; Arehart, S. V.; Dorota Greszta, D.; Pakula, T. J. Phys. Org. Chem.
2000, 13, 775. (b) Shin, E. J.; Brown, H. A.; Gonzalez, S.; Jeong, W.;
Hedrick, J. L.; Waymouth, R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6388.
(10) A stereogradient poly(propylene carbonate) synthesized by the
enantioselective copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon
dioxide was recently reported by Nozaki et al. The microstructure of
this material appears to be equivalent to that of Spassky’s PLA, viz., a
tapered diblock copolymer. See: (a) Nakano, K.; Hashimoto, S.;
Nakamura, M.; Kamada, T.; Nozaki, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
4868. (b) Lee, B. Y.; Cyriac, A. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 505.
(11) Yeori, A.; Gendler, S.; Groysman, S.; Goldberg, I.; Kol, M. Inorg.
Chem. Commun. 2004, 7, 280.
(12) (a) Press, K.; Cohen, A.; Goldberg, I.; Venditto, V.; Mazzeo, M.;
Kol, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3529. (b) Press, K.; Venditto,
V.; Goldberg, I.; Kol, M. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 9096.
(13) (a) Fujisaki, J.; Matsumoto, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Katsuki, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 133, 56. (b) Sawada, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Katsuki, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4559.
2943
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja412798x | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2940−2943