Table 2 Photovoltaic performances of D assembled with antennas
present within the electrolyte and recorded under full sun
stable since they only slightly decrease (by less than 10%) over
5 days (Fig. S6, ESIz). We also note that upon ageing, the
performances of the cell with dyad D only decrease as
well, signifying that the degradation of the sensitizer could
be also responsible for the diminished photovoltaic efficiency
rather than the disruption of the supramolecular assembly. We
report herein the easy fabrication of panchromatic sensitizers by
using appropriate combinations of organic dyes associated
by supramolecular interactions. The use of antennas bound
to the chemisorbed sensitizer via a supramolecular interaction
broadens the absorbance of the sensitizers and shows undis-
putable superiority to antenna-free systems and to soluble
antennas displaying no affinity for the sensitizer (e.g. 1 and 2).
Moreover, this type of association is rather stable provided
that a slight amount of the antenna is introduced in the
electrolyte. This approach can be extended to other classes
of pigments since the functionalization with an imidazole moiety
can be straightforward in many cases. Even more importantly,
this concept can be extended to any dye based on zinc, magnesium
or ruthenium porphyrins or phthalocyanines, greatly improving
the light harvesting efficiency of this class of sensitizers which
recently proved to be highly competitive in the field of DSSC.11
This approach could furthermore find interest in solid-state dye
sensitized solar cells and organic photovoltaic (OPV), where
desorption of the chemisorbed dye is no longer an issue.
Dye
[A]/mmol Lꢀ1 Voc/mV Jsc/mA cmꢀ2 ff (%) Z (%)
D
D+A1
/
1
10
545
555
575
535
565
585
9.25
9.97
11.01
11.64
8.61
72
73
73
72
74
73
3.64
4.05
4.64
4.43
3.59
3.89
D+A2 sat.
D+1
D+2
10
10
9.09
confirming the importance of the solvent used for the supra-
molecular assembly and dipping time. However, after 5 days, a
significant drop of the photovoltaic performance was again
observed. This trend was monitored as well for the devices
built from THF (Table S5, ESIz). Because A1 and A2 are
slightly soluble in acetonitrile (the electrolyte solvent), an
equilibrium is established (TiO2–D–Ai 2 TiO2–D + Ai) in
the sealed cell and yields to a slight yet observable de-coordination
of the antennas from the zinc porphyrin partially damaging
the supramolecular assembly. An ‘‘orthogonal’’ solvent, where
D nor any antennas would be soluble, could circumvent this
problem. Another approach consists in solubilizing A1 or A2
directly into the liquid electrolyte, which will displace the
aforementioned equilibrium to the left and insures that no
desorption of D occurs. Thus, novel electrolytes were prepared
consisting of the traditional electrolyte into which was dissolved
A1 or A2. Several concentrations were investigated for A1: 1, 10
and 20 mM (electrolytes E1, E10 and E20 respectively). To
evaluate the effect of the supramolecular association over the
energy relay approach recently reported,5 we also tested two
other electrolytes containing BODIPY and DPP dyes lacking
the imidazole moiety (1 and 2, respectively see ESIz) at 10 mM
concentration (Table 2). First of all, when the antennas 1 and 2
were dissolved in the electrolyte, only a very weak contribution
of the latter to the IPCE was observed (dashed-line in Fig. 2),
highlighting the importance of formation of the supramolecular
assemblies for efficient energy transfer.
We acknowledge financial support from CNRS and the ANR
HABISOL (program Asyscol, no. ANR-08-HABISOL-002).
Notes and references
1 B. O’Regan and M. Gratzel, Nature, 1991, 353, 737–740.
¨
2 M. K. Nazeeruddin, P. Pechy, T. Renouard, S. M. Zakeeruddin,
R. Humphry-Baker, P. Comte, P. Liska, L. Cevey, E. Costa,
V. Shklover, L. Spiccia, G. B. Deacon, C. A. Bignozzi and
¨
M. Gratzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 1613–1624.
3 Y. Chen, Z. Zeng, C. Li, W. Wang, X. Wang and B. Zhang, New J.
Chem., 2005, 29, 773–776; J.-H. Yum, S.-R. Jang, P. Walter,
T. Geiger, F. Nueesch, S. Kim, J. Ko, M. Gratzel and
¨
M. K. Nazeeruddin, Chem. Commun., 2007, 4680–4682.
4 B. E. Hardin, E. T. Hoke, P. B. Armstrong, J.-H. Yum, P. Comte,
T. Torres, J. M. J. Frechet, M. K. Nazeeruddin, M. Gratzel and
¨
The best performances were obtained for electrolytes contain-
ing 10 mM of A1 (E10) and A2 saturated (o10 mM), thanks to
an increase of Jsc by 25% and 20% respectively. Despite the fact
that A2 has a weaker molar extinction coefficient than A1, the
photocurrent generated was higher possibly due to this broader
absorption band permitting to collect more light. An increase of
the photoconversion efficiency was observed with E1 too (1 mM),
although to a lesser extent probably because of insufficient
amounts of available antenna. The quantity of dye D adsorbed
on TiO2 was estimated to be around 13 nmol per electrode by
dye desorption (detailed procedure in ESIz). Assuming that an
available volume of the electrolyte inside the cell is ca. 2 mL, there
is only 2 nmol of antenna in the electrolyte E1 before supra-
molecular assembly, entailing incomplete ZnP coordination with
the antenna. Electrolyte E10 is well-suited to saturate all ZnP
sites and keep a reasonable amount of antenna in solution to
minimize its decoordination. As regards E20, despite an increased
Voc, a major drop of the Jsc (ca. 1.5 mA cmꢀ2) is experienced
possibly by shielding of the available light for D and/or by
quenching the excited state via antenna aggregation.
M. D. McGehee, Nat. Photonics, 2009, 3, 406–411; K. Shankar,
X. Feng and C. A. Grimes, ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 788–794.
5 V. Balzani and F. Scandola, Supramolecular Photochemistry,
Ellis Horwood, Chischester, UK, 1991.
6 F. Odobel and H. Zabri, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 5600–5611.
7 R. Amadelli, R. Argazzi, C. A. Bignozzi and F. Scandola, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 7099–7103; L. Chang Yeon and
T. H. Joseph, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 3760–3765; C. Siegers,
J. Hohl-Ebinger, B. Zimmermann, U. Wurfel, R. Muelhaupt,
¨
A. Hinsch and R. Haag, ChemPhysChem, 2007, 8, 1548–1556.
8 J. Warnan, F. Buchet, Y. Pellegrin, E. Blart and F. Odobel, Org.
Lett., 2011, 13, 3944–3947.
9 Y. Kobuke, Struct. Bonding, 121, 49–104.
10 N. K. Subbaiyan, C. A. Wijesinghe and F. D’Souza, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2009, 131, 14646–14647; A. Nomoto and Y. Kobuke, Chem.
Commun., 2002, 1104–1105; F. Silvestri, I. Lopez-Duarte, W. Seitz,
L. Beverina, M. V. Martinez-Diaz, T. J. Marks, D. M. Guldi,
G. A. Pagani and T. Torres, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4500–4502;
N. K. Subbaiyan, J. P. Hill, K. Ariga, S. Fukuzumi and
F. D’Souza, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6003–6005.
11 M. G. Walter, A. B. Rudine and C. C. Wamser, J. Porphyrins
Phthalocyanines, 2010, 14, 759–792; Y.-C. Chang, C.-L. Wang,
T.-Y. Pan, S.-H. Hong, C.-M. Lan, H.-H. Kuo, C.-F. Lo,
H.-Y. Hsu, C.-Y. Lin and E. W.-G. Diau, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 8910–8912; A. Yella, H.-W. Lee, H. N. Tsao, C. Yi,
A. K. Chandiran, M. K. Nazeeruddin, E. W.-G. Diau, C.-Y. Yeh,
Very interestingly, when the antenna is present in the
electrolyte the photoconversion efficiencies remain relatively
S. M. Zakeeruddin and M. Gratzel, Science, 2011, 334, 629–634.
¨
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 675–677 677