We commenced our study by subjecting compound 1a to various
irradiation conditions. Three commonly used transitional metal
photocatalysts, Ru(bpy)3Cl2, Ir(ppy)2(dtbpy)PF6 and fac-Ir(ppy)3,
were chosen to initiate the reaction, and a 40 W household
fluorescent lamp was used as the light source. The results are
summarized in Table 1. All these three complexes were capable of
effecting the reactions, but fac-Ir(ppy)3 was found to be the most
effective. With 2 mol% of fac-Ir(ppy)3 as the photocatalyst, the
reaction was complete in 12 h, giving rise to the desired product 1b
in excellent yield (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). It should be noted that
the fac-Ir(ppy)3-mediated reaction process does not need tertiary
amines as a sacrificial reductant, as fac-Ir(ppy)3* itself (E1/2
=
-1.73V, SCE in CH3CN)10c can fulfil the reducing task. In addition,
the reaction proceeded equally well in the presence or absence of
2,6-lutidine, indicating that the hydrogen bromide formed during
the reaction does not influence the catalytic process.
Scheme 4
at the same time. In the cases of 20a and 21a, the unusual
regioselectivity suggests that the electronic effect of the bromo
or methyl group plays a predominant role in directing the free
radical attack on the phenyl ring. Similar ortho selectivity has
been observed before in studies concerning the addition of aryl
radicals to arenes.14
In summary, an efficient protocol based on fac-Ir(ppy)3-
mediated visible light photoredox catalysis has been devel-
oped for the synthesis of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles from 2-
electron-withdrawing-group-substituted 2-bromo-anilides. This
procedure is advantageous in terms of high yield, mild-
ness of reaction conditions and tolerance of functional
groups.
A variety of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles was then prepared by
employing this photoredox protocol. The results are listed in Table
2. The yields were generally high for substrates incorporating
an electron-withdrawing group at the a-position, which is a
prerequisite for the reaction to take place. It is noteworthy
that 3-acetyl substituted oxindoles can be synthesized with high
efficiency. These compounds are relatively unstable compared with
their 3-ethylcarboxyl and cyano counterparts, and therefore the
copper-catalyzed direct oxidative coupling7 (approach (3), Scheme
1) is not suitable for their preparation. Although the oxidative
coupling can be achieved by using Ag2O as the oxidant, the yields
were not satisfactory, and a stoichiometric amount of Ag2O had
to be used.13a This obstacle can be overcome by using the mild
photochemical procedure. In addition, this protocol is tolerant
of substrates containing a bromo atom on the phenyl ring (Table
2, entries 15 and 20), which is liable to loss with conventional
free radical methods. However, when the substrate was 19a,
the reaction became complicated, and we failed to obtain the
expected oxindole product in pure form (Table 2, entry 19). It is
interesting to see that when compounds 20a and 21a were used
as the substrates, the sterically more hindered 20b¢ and 21b¢ were
obtained as the major products (Table 2, entries 20 and 21).
This protocol was also applied to effecting the reaction of
compound c. However, we failed to obtain the corresponding 3-
acetyl oxindole product from c (Scheme 3).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (No. 20772053) for financial support.
Notes and references
1 For recent reviews on oxindole synthesis, see: (a) C. Marti and E. M.
Carreira, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2003, 2209; (b) C. V. Galliford and K. A.
Scheidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8748; (c) F. Zhou, Y.-L. Liu
and J. Zhou, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 1381.
2 For reviews, see: (a) W. R. Bowman and J. M. D. Storey, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2007, 36, 1803; (b) G. J. Rowlands, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 8603;
(c) G. J. Rowlands, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 1593.
3 J. A. Murphy, R. Tripoli, T. A. Khan and U. W. Mali, Org. Lett., 2005,
7, 3287.
4 T. Nishio, K. Iseki, N. Araki and T. Miyazaki, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2005,
88, 35.
5 A. L. J. Beckwith, V. W. Bowry, W. R. Bowman, E. Mann, J. Parr and
J. M. D. Storey, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 95.
6 Y.-X. Jia and E. P. Ku¨ndig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48,
1636.
7 (a) A. Perry and R. J. K. Taylor, Chem. Commun., 2009, 3249; (b) J. E.
M. N. Klein, A. Perry, D. S. Pugh and R. J. K. Taylor, Org. Lett., 2010,
12, 3446.
Scheme 3
8 M. Fagnoni, D. Dondi, D. Ravelli and A. Albini, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 2725; N. Hoffmann, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 1052.
9 For reviews, see: (a) T. P. Yoon, M. A. Ischay and Juana Du, Nat.
Chem., 2010, 527; (b) J. M. R. Narayanam and C. R. J. Stephenson,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 102.
10 (a) D. A. Nicewicz and D. W. C. MacMillan, Science, 2008, 322,
77; (b) D. A. Nagib, M. E. Scott and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 10875; (c) H.-W. Shih, M. N. Vander Wal, R.
L. Grange and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
13600.
A possible mechanism was proposed to rationalize the fac-
Ir(ppy)3-catalyzed photochemical synthesis of 3,3-disubstituted
oxindoles (Scheme 4). The reaction is initiated by the single
electron transfer between the visible light-excited fac-Ir(ppy)3 and
substrate a, which leads to the formation of the a-carbamoyl
+
radical d and the oxidation of fac-Ir(ppy)3* to fac-Ir(ppy)3 .
Cyclisation of d results in the formation of e. The latter is converted
+
to product b via single electron oxidation by fac-Ir(ppy)3 and
11 (a) J. W. Tucker, J. M. R. Narayanam, S. W. Krabbe and C. R. J.
subsequent deprotonation, with fac-Ir(ppy)3 being regenerated
Stephenson, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 368; (b) L. Furst, B. S. Matsuura,
500 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 498–501
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
©