heterocycle synthesis.5 The majority of cross-coupling
methods rely on an activating group to secure reactivity
and to control regioselectivity; an intrinsic feature of
these reactions is that at the completion of the transfor-
mation the activating group is usually discarded as
waste. For example, aryl halides (ArꢀX) when combined
with an organometallic coupling partner (MꢀR) deliver
(MꢀX) salts as waste products. Coupling reactions that
rely on addition processes, as opposed to substitution reac-
tions, allow the activating group to be reincorporated into
the product; effectively, the activating groups are recycled.3,6
The ability to recycle activating groups, and in the process
provide a handle for further manipulation, begins to address
the demand to produce more sustainable synthetic routes.
We have recently demonstrated an effective activating
group recycling approach to arene functionalization based
on Rh-catalyzed alkyne carbothiolation.3 In this system,
simple aryl methyl sulfides are combined with alkynes to
deliver alkenyl sulfide products resulting from both CꢀC
and CꢀS bond formation. Crucially, the alkenyl sulfide
functionality incorporated in the products represents a
masked carbonyl unit, and as such provides a powerful
handle for further functionalization.7 Wanting to exploit
the utility of this masked carbonyl unit we conceived a new
route to substituted isoquinolines.8 The key transforma-
tion involves the Rh-catalyzed carbothiolation of alkynes
with carbonyl-containing aryl methyl sulfides, leading to
the formation of a masked benzo-fused 1,5-dicarbonyl
(1 þ 2 f 3, Scheme 1); treatment of dicarbonyl 3 with an
ammonia source would allow access to isoquinolines (4).
Our initial report of a Rh-catalyzed alkyne carbothiola-
Scheme 1. A Rh-Catalyzed Alkyne Carbothiolation Route to
Isoquinolines
the commercially available precursor [Rh(nbd)2]BF4,
which can be employed routinely without recourse to a
glovebox and allowed the active catalyst to be generated in
situ by addition of the phosphine ligand and subsequent
hydrogenation. Due to the significant decrease in catalyst
solubility when moving from the BArF to BF4 counter-
4
ions, a new solvent system was established (Table 1). After
evaluating a number of solvents, the desired carbothiola-
tionreactionwas achieved in good yieldswith a selection of
terminal alkynes and methyl sulfide 5 using 5 mol %
[Rh(nbd)2BF4] and 5 mol % DPEphos, in either DCE or
chlorobenzene (Table 1, entries 1ꢀ4).
Table 1. Use of the BF4 Anion in Rh-Catalyzed Alkyne Car-
bothiolationa
tion reaction employed the [Rh(DPEphos)(o-xylene)][BArF ]
4
complex A as the precatalyst, used in o-xylene.3 Although
complex A represents an efficient catalyst system, the use of
the BArF4 counterion makes this catalyst relatively expensive
and also difficult to prepare without the use of a glovebox.9
In order to deliver a practical solution, we therefore
sought to identify a new catalyst system which retained the
activity of complex A, was straightforward to prepare, and
avoided use of the BArF4 anion. We began by employing
entry
R
ligand
time
yield (DCE, PhCl)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ph
DPEphos
DPEphos
DPEphos
DPEphos
24 h
24 h
24 h
24 h
80%, 90%
73%, 90%
70%, 80%
24%, 33%c
99%, 99%
96%, 99%
99%, 99%
43%,c 80%
81%, ꢀ
4-MeO-Ph
4-F-Ph
3,5-(CF3)2-Ph
Ph
Xantphos 2 h
Xantphos 2 h
Xantphos 1.5 h
Xantphos 24 h
4-MeO-Ph
4-F-Ph
3,5-(CF3)2-Ph
CH2N(Boc)Bn Xantphos 1.5 h
(5) (a) Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Li, J. J., Gribble,
G. W., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, U.K., 2007. (b) Sadig, J. E. R.; Willis, M. C.
Synthesis 2011, 1. (c) Ball, C.; Willis, M. C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 425.
(6) For related examples of “activating group recycling”, see: (a)
Schomaker, J. M.; Grigg, R. D. Synlett 2013, 401. (b) Alcaide, B.;
a Reaction conditions: 1 (1 equiv), alkyne (1.5 equiv), Rh(nbd)2BF4
(5 mol %), ligand (5 mol %), solvent (0.3 M), 80 °C (DCE), 100 °C
(chlorobenzene). b Isolated yields. c Conversion determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopy.
ꢀ
Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Cembellın, S.; Fernandez, I.; del Campo,
´
The change from a BArF anion to BF4 resulted in a
T. M.; Torres, R. M. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7779. (c) Grigg, R. D.;
Van Hoveln, R.; Schomaker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 16131.
(d) Newman, S. G.; Howell, J. K.; Nicolaus, N.; Lautens, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14916. (e) Newman, S. G.; Lautens, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1778. (f) Liu, H.; Li, C.; Qiu, D.; Tong, X. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6187.
4
lower activity catalyst, and in an attempt to achieve faster
catalysis wenext focused onthe structure of the ligand. The
flexibility and hemilabile nature of the DPEphos ligand
allows it to adopt a number of coordination modes
(Scheme 2). We have previously observed that the reaction
of complex A with sulfide 5 results in an equilibrium
mixture of A with complexes B and C in a 0.1:1:0.1 ratio
(o-xylened10 298 K). We speculated that by locking the
ligand into a single, active conformation, the efficiency of
the reaction might be improved. To impede this flexibility
around the PꢀOꢀP bonds present in DPEphos, we ex-
plored the use of a rigid DPEphos analogue, XantPhos.10
(7) Schaumann, E. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 274, 1.
(8) For selected recent reports of transition metal catalyzed ap-
proaches to isoquinolines, see: (a) Guimond, N.; Fagnou, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12050. (b) Chiba, S.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12886. (c) Jayakumar, J.; Parthasarathy, K.;
Cheng, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 197. (d) Donohoe, T. J.;
Pilgrim, B. S.; Jones, G. R.; Bassuto, J. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2012, 109, 11605. (e) Kornhaass, C.; Li, J.; Ackermann, L. J. Org. Chem.
2012, 77, 9190. (f) Wang, H.; Grohmann, C.; Nimphius, C.; Glorius, F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19592. (g) Meng, L.; Ju, J.; Bin, Y.; Hua, R.
J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5794.
(9) Yakelis, N. A.; Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3579.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 20, 2013
5163