1216
G. Leszczynska et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 1214–1217
Some aspects of the mechanism of s2U/s2U⁄ oxidation/desulfur-
E. coli tRNAGlu2 anticodon arm bearing mnm5s2U and m2A have been
elaborated. The same procedure can be used for the synthesis of
tRNA fragments modified with mnm5s2U in the presence of t6A, as
well as for the incorporation of several 2-thiouridines into oligoribo-
nucleotide sequences.
ization have been studied, but only the pathway involving selective
desulfurization of s2U upon treatment with 2-phenylsulfonyloxaz-
iridine has been investigated in detail and discussed so far.15 Based
on literature and the results of model studies, the degrees of sensi-
tivity of s2U/s2U⁄ to oxidizers could be arranged in the ascending or-
der as follows: m5s2U < mcm5s2U 6 s2U ꢁ mnm5s2U < mo5s2U.
This ranking may reflect the tendency of s2U derivatives toward
enolization. A shift toward the enol form has been recorded for
mo5U26 and mo5s2U,27 while mnm5s2U crystallizes as a zwitter-
ion.28 Protonation of the side-chain amine function of mnm5s2U un-
der neutral conditions was postulated, and, based on pKa < 8
estimated for mnm5s2U, it can be expected that a considerable frac-
tion of this nucleoside is ionized under physiological conditions.29
Blocking the side-chain amine function of 1 with a strong elec-
tron-withdrawing CF3C(O)-group can induce a charge distribution
in the heterocyclic moiety similar to that originating from the
above-mentioned protonation process. This effect can be responsi-
ble for the enhanced tendency of the mnm5s2U-derived monomeric
unit to enolization, and consequently to oxidation/oxidative desul-
furization processes during the P(III) to P(V) oxidation step. The
substantial reduction of tert-butyl hydroperoxide degradation to
the active oxygen species in toluene compared to CH2Cl2,30 and
the diminished tendency of 1 to ionization in a non-polar aprotic
solvent would be expected to decrease the sensitivity of nucleoside
1 to oxidation.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Grant 1306/B/H03/2011/40 from
the National Science Centre, Poland.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Jühling, F.; Mörl, M.; Hartmann, R. K.; Sprinzl, M.; Stadler, P. F.; Pütz, J. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2009, 37, D159.
2. Agris, P. F. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 629.
3. Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Wada, T.; Saigo, K.; Watanabe, K. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 6581.
4. Motorin, Y.; Helm, M. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 4934.
5. Agris, P. F.; Vendeix, F. A. P.; Graham, W. D. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 366, 1.
6. Giegé, R.; Lapointe, J. In Grosjean, H., Ed.; DNA and RNA Modification Enzymes:
Structure, Mechanism, Function and Evolution; Landes Bioscience: Austin, TX,
2009; p 475.
7. Bilbille, Y.; Vendeix, F. A. P.; Guenther, R.; Malkiewicz, A.; Ariza, X.; Vilarrasa, J.;
Agris, P. F. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 3342.
8. Graham, W. D.; Barley-Maloney, L.; Stark, C. J.; Kaur, A.; Stolyarchuk, K.; Sproat,
B.; Leszczynska, G.; Malkiewicz, A.; Safwat, N.; Mucha, P.; Guenther, R.; Agris, P.
F. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 410, 698.
9. Kumar, R. K.; Davis, D. R. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1997, 16, 1469.
10. Okamoto, I.; Seio, K.; Sekine, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6034.
11. Carlucci, M.; Kierzek, E.; Olejnik, A.; Turner, D. H.; Kierzek, R. Biochemistry
2009, 48, 10882.
12. Sipa, K.; Sochacka, E.; Kazmierczak-Baranska, J.; Maszewska, M.; Janicka, M.;
Nowak, G.; Nawrot, B. RNA 2007, 13, 1301.
13. Sochacka, E. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2001, 20, 1871.
14. Okamoto, I.; Seio, K.; Sekine, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 583.
15. Sochacka, E.; Fratczak, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6729.
16. Kumar, R. K.; Davis, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7726.
17. Diop-Frimpong, B.; Prakash, T. P.; Rajeev, K. G.; Manoharan, M.; Egli, M. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2005, 33, 5297.
18. (a) Davis, D. R.; Bajji, A. C. Methods Mol. Biol. 2005, 288, 187; (b) Sundaram, M.;
Crain, P. F.; Davis, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5609.
19. Hayakawa, Y.; Kataoka, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12395.
20. Eshete, M.; Marchbank, M. T.; Deutscher, S. L.; Sproat, B.; Leszczynska, G.;
Malkiewicz, A.; Agris, P. F. Protein J. 2007, 26, 61.
A solution of 0.25 M t-BuOOH in toluene was successfully ap-
plied to the solid-phase supported synthesis (phosphoramidite
methodology) of model oligoribonucleotides modified with
mnm5s2U or s2U unit(s) and double modified E. coli ASLGlu2, with
site-specifically located mnm5s2U34 and m2A37 (Table 2).
The 50-O-DMTr, 20-O-TBDMS protection strategy for the phos-
phoramidites of s2U (4), mnm5s2U (5) and m2A (6) was employed
(Fig. 1). Compounds s2U and mnm5s2U were synthesized according
to previously reported methods.31,32 2-Methyladenosine (m2A)
was prepared as follows: peracetylated guanosine was chlorinated
to give 2-amino-6-chloro-9-(20,30,50-tri-O-acetylribofuranosyl) pur-
ine,33 and this compound was converted into 2-iodoadenosine.34
Subsequently, 2-iodoadenosine was alkylated with trimethylalu-
minium in the presence of a palladium catalyst to give 2-methylad-
enosine (m2A).35 The side-chain amine function of m2A was
protected with a benzoyl group as previously described.36 Standard
procedures were employed for final protection of the 50-O- and 20-
O-functions with DMTr and TBDMS groups, respectively, as well as
for 30-O-phosphitylation.18,36,37 The analytical and spectral data of
monomer units 4–6 were identical with those reported in the
literature.36,38
21. Sproat, B. personal communication.
22. (a) Patent application: Guenther, R. H.; Newman, W. H.; Yenne, S. P.; Mitchell,
D.; Malkiewicz, A. WO/2008/064304A2, Chem. Abstr. 2008, 148, 577353s.; (b)
Patent application: Agris, P. F. US 2011/0098215A1, Chem. Abstr. 2713423.;
23. 50-O-(4,40-Dimethoxytrityl)-30-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-5-(N-
trifluoroacetyl)methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine (1). Readily available 2-
thiouridine31 was converted into 20,30-O-isopropylidene-5-methylamino-
methyl-2-thiouridine via the 5-chloromethyluridine derivative, as described
The synthesis of the RNA sequences was conducted automati-
cally on a 0.2 lmol scale using commercial Pac(tac)-protected
previously.32a The heterobase side chain was efficiently protected with
a
phosphoramidites (ProligoÒ) and standard coupling chemistry with
the exception of t-BuOOH oxidation.39 Oligoribonucleotides were
deprotected according to a slightly modified Sproat protocol.40
The fully deprotected oligomers were precipitated and purified by
anion-exchange HPLC (see Supplementary data). The integrity of
the synthesized oligoribonucleotide sequences was confirmed by
analytical HPLC and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Table 2).
In conclusion, under oxidizing conditions, the heterocyclic
moieties of 2-thiouridine derivatives undergo side-reactions, and
consequently the P(III) to P(V) oxidation is a critical step for the so-
lid-phase supported synthesis of oligoribonucleotides containing
s2U/s2U⁄. Protected 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine appeared
to be very sensitive to the standard oxidants used in the phospho-
ramidite methodology, however it remains intact in a dilute solution
of tert-butyl hydroperoxide in toluene. Based on these observations,
a reliable approach to the synthesis of model oligoribonucleotides
modified with mnm5s2U as well as the native sequence of the
trifluoroacetyl group and the 20,30-O-acetonide was removed under mild acidic
conditions to give an N-protected nucleoside. The 50-O-DMTr, 30-O-TBDMS and
50-O-DMTr, 20-O-TBDMS masked nucleosides were then synthesized according
to the standard procedure18 and separated by silica gel chromatography. 50-O-
DMTr, 30-O-TBDMS isomer: TLC, Rf = 0.71 (CH2Cl2/acetone 9:1 v/v); 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 250 MHz): d = ꢀ0.13 (s, 3H, SiCH3), 0.00 (s, 3H, SiCH3), 0.81 (s, 9H,
Si(CH3)3), 3.22 (s, 3H, NCH3), 3.45–3.59 (m, 4H, 5-CH2, H50, H5’’), 3.78 (s, 6H,
2xOCH3), 4.17–4.20 (m, 3H, H20, H30, H40), 6.66 (d, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H10), 6.80–
7.48 (m, 13H, Ar), 8.02 (s, 1H, H6); FAB MS m/z for C40F3H48N3O8SiS calcd 815,
found 814.3 [MꢀH]ꢀ. 50-O-DMTr, 20-O-TBDMS isomer: TLC Rf = 0.80 (CH2Cl2/
acetone 9:1 v/v); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz): d = 0.12 (s, 3H, SiCH3), 0.14 (s, 3H,
SiCH3), 0.91 (s, 9H, Si(CH3)3), 3.21 (s, 3H, NCH3), 3.45–3.59 (m, 9H, 5-CH2,
2xOCH3, H50), 4.09–4.22 (m, 2H, H30, H40), 4.40–4.44 (m, 1H, H20), 6.75 (d, 1H,
J = 4.75 Hz, H10), 6.81–7.48 (m, 13H, Ar), 7.98 (s, 1H, H6).
24. 50-O-(4,40-Dimethoxytrityl)-30-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-1-(b-
5-(N-trifluoroacetyl)methylaminomethyl-4-pyrimidinone (2). Nucleoside 1 (50
mg, 0.061 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of anhydrous CH2Cl2 (500 l) and
anhydrous pyridine (120 l) and then 0.2 M mCPBA in CH2Cl2 (602 l) was added.
The solution was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. After TLC analysis (Rf = 0.12;
CH2Cl2/acetone 9:1 v/v), the mixture was washed with 5% aq. NaHCO3 (500 l),
dried over MgSO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was
D-ribofuranosyl)-
l
l
l
l