7 J. G. Vitillo, L. Regli, S. Chavan, G. Ricchiardi, G. Spoto,
P. D. C. Dietzel, S. Bordiga and A. J. Zecchina, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 8386.
8 S. K. Bhatia and A. L. Myers, Langmuir, 2006, 22, 1688.
9 S. S. Han and W. A. Goddard, III, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
8422.
greater use for the storage of more strongly polarizable gases or
for separation applications. For example, it has been shown
recently that the introduction of ‘‘soft’’ cations such as Sb3+ can
enhance the CO2/H2 separation efficiency in aerogels.39
10 D. Himsl, D. Wallacher and M. Hartmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2009, 48, 4639.
4. Conclusions
11 L. Wang and R. T. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 21883.
12 Y. Xia, G. S. Walker, D. M. Grant and R. J. Mokaya, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2009, 131, 16493.
With UHM-2, UHM-4 and UHM-3(50)–4(50) a series of new
isoreticular MOFs is presented, which are composed of dicopper
paddle wheel units and the tetracarboxylic acids 5,50-(propane-
2,2-diyl)diisophthalic acid, dimethyl(bis-3,5-dimethylphenyl)
silane and dimethyl(bis-3,5-dimethylphenyl)germane as linker
molecules. All materials exhibit permanent porosity after acti-
vation. The isoreticular MOF series UHM-2, -3, and -4, in which
the central atom X of the linker is varied (X ¼ C, Si, and Ge)
allowed for a systematic study concerning the influence of the
incorporation of atoms with higher polarizability on the
hydrogen uptake. The hydrogen uptake at 77 K and 1 bar as well
as the isosteric heat of adsorption values slightly increase in the
order X ¼ C < X ¼ Si < X ¼ Ge. However, the effect is not very
pronounced and further investigations by DFT calculations
reveal that the influence of dispersive interactions between the
hydrogen molecule and the central atom is relatively marginal
with respect to the effect of geometric changes, which are
introduced with the interchange of the central atom. The
hypothesis that there is a positive correlation between the
polarizability of linker atoms on the one hand and the hydrogen
uptake on the other could not be verified. Taking the results of
the thermal analyses into account, which indicate incomplete
solvent removal through thermal treatment, the influence of the
activation procedure seems to have a much greater effect than the
chemical nature of the linker. This is also reflected in the values
for the specific surface area, which are strongly dependent on the
overall sample quality. This confirms once again that (a) repro-
ducible syntheses routes—leading to samples of comparable
quality, and (b) efficient activation procedures are key issues for
developing improved hydrogen storage materials based on
MOFs.
13 X.-S. Wang, M. Shengqian, P. M. Forster, Y. Daqiang, J. Eckert,
ꢁ
J. J. Lopez, B. J. Murphy, J. B. Parise and H.-C. Zhou, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7263.
€
14 S. E. Wenzel, M. Fischer, F. Hoffmann and M. Froba, Inorg. Chem.,
2009, 48, 6559.
15 Due to H–D-exchange between DMSO-d6 the intensity of this signal
is too less (it should correspond to four protons). Complete oxidation
is proved by the total absence of the signal at 2.22 ppm which
correlates to the methyl groups of the educt.
16 G. te Velde, F. M. Bickelhaupt, E. J. Baerends, C. Fonseca Guerra,
S. J. A. van Gisbergen, J. G. Snijders and T. Ziegler, J. Comput.
Chem., 2001, 22, 931.
17 C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785.
18 S. Grimme, J. Comput. Chem., 2006, 27, 1787.
19 P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski and M. J. Frisch,
J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 11623.
20 M. Fischer, PhD thesis, University of Hamburg, 2011, http://
ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/volltexte/2011/5342/.
ꢁ
21 A. K. Rappe, C. J. Casewit, K. S. Colwell, W. A. Goddard, III and
W. M. Skiff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 10024.
22 Materials Studio, v4.4, Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, 2010.
23 Restricted Rietveld refinements (scaling factor, zero point shift, lattice
parameters) were carried out, too, for both UHM-2 and UHM-4
structural models. The lattice constants changed only insignificantly
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
to the following values: a ¼ b ¼ 32.9748 A, c ¼ 22.5110 A, V ¼
3
ꢀ
24 482 A for UHM-2 and a ¼ b ¼ 34.2146 A, c ¼ 23.7709 A, V ¼
3
27 827 A for UHM-4.
ꢀ
24 The value of 2.14 wt% was obtained in this work, while a value of 2.57
wt% was measured in the original work as reported in ref. 14. This
difference reflects some difficulties to gain samples which are
activated to the same amount. However, this study focused mainly
on the systematic evaluation of the interaction of hydrogen with the
linker, therefore the heat of adsorption values, in particular at low
loadings, are of much greater relevance.
25 J. L. C. Rowsell and O. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 1304.
26 A. G. Wong-Foy, A. J. Matzger and O. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 3494.
27 M. Hirscher and B. Panella, Scr. Mater., 2007, 56, 809.
28 K. M. Thomas, Dalton Trans., 2009, 1487.
Acknowledgements
29 B. Xiao, P. S. Wheatley, X. Zhao, A. J. Fletcher, S. Fox, A. G. Rossi,
I. L. Megson, S. Bordiga, L. Regli, K. M. Thomas and
R. E. J. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1203.
The authors thank Rabea Dippel, Justus Liebig University,
Gießen, for carrying out the EDX analysis and Katharina Pei-
kert for support in the laboratory.
€
30 H. Frost, T. Duren and R. Q. Snurr, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110,
9565.
31 B. Schmitz, U. Muller, N. Trukhan, M. Schubert, G. Ferey and
€
M. Hirscher, ChemPhysChem, 2008, 9, 2181.
ꢁ
€
€
32 B. Schmitz, I. Krkljus, E. Leung, H. W. Hoffken, U. Muller and
M. Hirscher, ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 758.
33 K. Sillar, A. Hofmann and J. Sauer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
4143.
Notes and references
1 J. Sculley, D. Yuan and H. C. Zhou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4,
2721.
2 H. Furukawa, N. Ko, Y. B. Go, N. Aratani, S. B. Choi, E. Choi,
34 X. Solans-Monfort, M. Sodupe and J. Eckert, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010,
114, 13926.
35 L. Valenzano, B. Civalleri, S. Chavan, G. T. Palomino, C. O. Arean
and S. Bordiga, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 11185.
36 T. Heine, L. Zhechkov and G. Seifert, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
2004, 6, 980.
€
A. O. Yazaydin, R. Q. Snurr, M. O’Keeffe, J. Kim and
O. M. Yaghi, Science, 2010, 329, 424.
ꢁ
€
3 O. K. Farha, A. O. Yazaydin, I. Eryazici, C. D. Malliakas,
B. G. Hauser, M. G. Kanatzidis, S. T. Nguyen, R. Q. Snurr and
J. T. Hupp, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 944.
37 A. G. Donchev, J. Chem. Phys., 2007, 126, 124706.
38 S. Figueroa-Gerstenmaier, S. Giudice, L. Cavallo and G. Milano,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 3935.
4 M. P. Suh, H. J. Park, T. K. Prasad and D.-W. Lim, Chem. Rev., 2012,
112, 782.
5 D. J. Collins and H.-C. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 3154.
6 D. Zhao, D. Yuan and H. C. Zhou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2008, 1, 222.
39 S. Bag and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14951.
10302 | J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 10294–10302
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012