Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
5,7-Dihydroxy-8-(1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl)-2-phenyl-4H-chro-
men-4-one (( )-15). A mixture of chrysin (2.03 g, 8 mmol) and
freshly prepared 2-hydroxy-1-methylpyrrolidine (1.21 g, 12 mmol) in
water (4 mL) and THF (4 mL) was heated at 80 °C in a sealed tube
for 5 h and then cooled to rt and diluted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and
H2O (10 mL). The mixture was filtered to remove trace of insoluble
chrysin. The separated aqueous layer of the filtrate was extracted with
CH2Cl2 (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried
molecular docking step. For both PDB structures and homology
models, the hydrogen atoms were added and energy minimized with
OPLS2005 force field (standard parameters from Schrodinger’s
̈
Protein Preparation Wizard Workflow), keeping all heavy atoms fixed.
Three-dimensional structures of ligands were generated using
CORINA28 v3.44, and then all combinations of stereoisomers and
protonation states at pH 7.0 2.0 were calculated with the LigPrep
module from the Schrodinger Suite.29 Whenever the absolute
configuration of a chiral center in the ligand structure was unknown,
both isomers were considered in the docking process. The amino
groups at C-8 in all flavonoidal compounds were used in the
protonated form throughout this work.
1
(Na2SO4) and concentrated. The residue (15/12 = 1:5 by H NMR)
was purified by flash column chromatography (AcOEt/MeOH 10:0 to
95:5) to afford F1 ( )-15 (347 mg, 13%) and F2 (12) (1923 mg,
71%) as yellow crystals. Data for ( )-15: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 12.65 (s, 1H), 7.81−7.78 (m, 2H), 7.54−7.24 (m, 3H), 6.62
(s, 1H), 6.26 (s, 1H), 4.13 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.41−3.34 (m, 1H),
2.56−2.37 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.05−1.86 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3) δ 182.5, 166.0, 163.1, 161.5, 155.1, 132.0, 131.9, 129.4,
126.2, 106.1, 104.7, 102.6, 100.9, 64.7, 55.7, 40.7, 32.9, 23.4. HRMS:
m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C20H20NO4, 338.1392; found, 338.1381. Then
200 mg of F1 was next subjected to SFC HPLC separation using
column IC, 50% cosolvents (iPrOH/diethylamine 99:1), flow rate 4
mL/min; tR1 = 5.8 min, 78 mg, ee > 99%, [α]D23 −160 (c, 0.1, CHCl3),
configuration S; tR2 = 6.9 min, 85 mg, ee = 92%, [α]D23 +144.5 (c, 0.11,
CHCl3), configuration R (determined by X-ray diffraction).
Molecular docking calculations were performed using GOLD 5.0
software30 with both GoldScore and Chemscore_Kinase scoring
functions. After 200 genetic algorithm (GA) runs with 100000 GA
operations per docking, clusters were created at 2.0 Å rmsd. Ligand
flexibility was allowed to explore ring conformations and flip ring
corners. After docking, the complex was minimized using Schro-
̈
dinger’s Maestro framework31 taking into account protein residues
within 8.0 Å from the ligand. Visual inspection of the resulting clusters
showed that in most cases the lowest energy cluster presented the
correct positioning in the binding site, with a conformation similar to
the one adopted by flavopiridol in the CDK9 crystal structure (see
Figure S3, Supporting Information). In the other few instances, this
correct positioning related to flavopiridol was found in the second
cluster (and once in the third cluster). In these latter cases, the
differences between the score of the selected complex and the score of
the lowest energy complex were not significant (less than 10%).
Images of the protein−ligand complexes were rendered using
PyMol version 0.99.32
5,7-Dihydroxy-8-(1-(methylamino)hexyl)-2-phenyl-4H-chromen-
4-one (( )-18) and 5,7-Dihydroxy-6-(1-(methylamino)hexyl)-2-
phenyl-4H-chromen-4-one (( )-17). A mixture of chrysin (2.03 g, 8
mmol) and hexanal (1.00 g, 10 mmol) in an aqueous solution MeNH2
(40% in water, 6.2 g, 80 mmol) was heated in a sealed tube at 40 °C
for 5 h and then cooled to rt and diluted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and
H2O (10 mL). The mixture was filtered to remove trace of insoluble
chrysin. The separated aqueous layer of the filtrate was extracted with
CH2Cl2 (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried
(Na2SO4) and concentrated. The residue (8-substituted: 6-substituted
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
1
= 1:2 by H NMR) was purified by flash column chromatography
Experimental details, NMR, mass, HPLC chromatograms of
racemic and enantiomers data, X-ray data, X-ray structures of
(−)-1, (+)-15, and (−)-18, table with residue variability in the
binding sites of kinases and sequence alignment used for
homology modeling. This material is available free of charge via
(AcOEt/MeOH 10:0 to 95:5) to afford F1 5,7-dihydroxy-8-(1-
(methylamino)hexyl)-2-phenyl-4H-chromen-4-one (793 mg, 27%)
and F2 5,7-dihydroxy-6-(1-(methylamino)hexyl)-2-phenyl-4H-chro-
men-4-one (2.42 g, 67%) as yellow crystals. Under other conditions
in which a mixture of chrysin (254 mg, 1 mmol), hexanal (200 mg, 2
mmol), and MeNH2 (40% in water, 0.46 mL, 6 mmol) was heated in a
sealed tube at 40 °C for 16 h then cooled to rt and subjected to the
same treatment, 5,7-dihydroxy-6-(1-(methylamino)hexyl)-2-phenyl-
4H-chromen-4-one was obtained preponderantly (286 mg, 78%).
( )-18: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.72 (s, 1H), 7.82−7.80 (m,
2H), 7.54−7.24 (m, 3H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H), 4.38 (t, J = 6.8
Hz, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 1.87−1.79 (m, 2H), 1.49−1.16 (m, 6H), 0.77
(t, J = 7 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 182.6, 166.2, 163.1,
161.5, 155.2, 131.9, 129.4, 126.2, 106.0, 104.8, 102.8, 100.9, 59.1, 35.8,
34.6, 31.8, 25.9, 22.7, 14.1. HRMS: m/z [M + H]+ calcd for
C22H26NO4, 368.1862; found, 368.1850. ( )-17: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 13.09 (s, 1H), 7.85−7.81 (m, 2H), 7.48−7.36 (m, 3H), 6.58
(s, 1H), 6.36 (s, 1H), 4.25 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.83−1.66
(m, 2H), 1.49−1.16 (m, 6H), 0.77 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3) δ 182.6, 166.6, 163.7, 159.6, 157.3, 131.7, 129.2, 126.4,
107.9, 105.6, 95.1, 77.7, 77.2, 76.8, 58.3, 35.1, 34.3, 31.9, 25.6, 22.7,
14.2. HRMS: m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C22H26NO4, 368.1862; found,
368.1869. Enantiomeric separation of ( )-18 by chiral HPLC: 400 mg
of F1 was next subjected to SFC HPLC separation using column IC,
20% cosolvents (MeOH/diethylamine 98:2), flow rate 4 mL/min; tR1
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
*For chemistry (F.G.): phone, +33 (0) 1 69 82 45 80; E-mail,
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Kinase assays were supported by grants from “Association
■
France-Alzheimer” (Comite
(Institut National du Cancer) “Recherches Biomed
́
du Finister
̀
e) (L.M.), INCa
icales”
́
(GLIOMER project) (L.M.), “Fonds Unique Interministeriel”
(PHARMASEA project) (L.M.), and “Ligue Nationale contre le
Cancer” (Comite
́ ̀
du Finistere) (L.M.).
23
= 9.7 min, 165 mg, ee = 96%, [α]D +62.3 (c, 0.12, CHCl3),
23
ABBREVIATIONS USED
configuration R; tR2 = 13.3 min, 159 mg, ee = 99%, [α]D −65.4 (c,
■
0.26, CHCl3), configuration S (determined by X-ray diffraction).
5.3. Molecular Modeling. Crystal structures were downloaded
from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), and residues not belonging to the
protein were removed, including water molecules. The homology
model of CDK1 was built with MODELER26 v9.7 using the X-ray
structure of CDK2 (PDB code 1YKR) and the sequence alignment
shown in Figure S2 of the Supporting Information), generated using
the ClustalW27 software (v1.8). Several homology models (100) were
built, and the one with the best DOPE energy score retained for the
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; GSK3, glycogen synthase
kinase-3; DYRK1A, dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-
regulated kinase 1A; CLK1, CDC-like kinase 1; ATP, adenosine
5′-triphosphate; SFC, supercritical fluid chromatography;
HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; THF,
tetrahydrofuran; [α], specific rotation; μM, micromolar; IC50,
half-maximum inhibitory concentration; PDB, Protein Data
Bank; rmsd, root-mean-square deviation; Val, valine; Ala,
2818
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm201727w | J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 2811−2819