2068
T. Wang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 2063–2069
O
O
OH
Cl
H2N
NH2
Cl
N
O
Br
NH2
NH2
9
7
HO
Br
N
a
b
N
N
H
6
8
O
NH2
HN
N
HO
HN
HO
HN
c
O
O
Br
Br
N
N
H
N
H
N
N
5c
10
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) 2-methoxybenzoic acid (7), POCl3, CH3CN, microwave, 150 °C, 1 h; (b) 2-hydroxyl-1,3-diamine (9, excess), n-BuOH, microwave,
160 °C, 4 h; (c) cyclobutanecarboxylic acid, HATU, Et3N, DMF, room temperature, 2 h.
over, an X-ray crystal structure of 4g in complex with CDK2 aided
the design of inhibitors with reduced CDK2 potency (Fig. 4).19 For
the purpose of tuning the azabenzimidazole scaffold selectivity,
the most obvious residue to exploit is the gatekeeper on the hinge
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Judith Stanway for insect cell
culture, Anna Valentine for protein purification, Claire Brassington
for protein crystallization, Scott Williams and Melissa Vasbinder
for the helpful discussions.
which is variable for the off-target kinases: TBK1 (Met), IKKe (Met),
Aurora family (Leu), and CDK2 (Phe). As shown in Figure 4, the
6-substituent of the azabenzimidazole points to the gatekeeper,
therefore it was reasoned that modification off the 6-position might
modulate the selectivity against the Aurora B and CDK2 kinases. As
the data in Table 5 show, analogues with a 6-CONH2 group (5a–b)
exhibited significant improvements in selectivity over Aurora B
References and notes
1. Dancey, J.; Sausville, E. A. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2003, 2, 296.
2. Zhang, J.; Yang, P. L.; Gray, N. S. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 28.
3. Lee, D.-F.; Hung, M.-C. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 5656.
4. Burke, J. R. Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev. 2003, 6, 720.
5. Fitzgerald, K. A.; McWhirter, S. M.; Faia, K. L.; Rowe, D. C.; Latz, E.; Golenbock, D.
T.; Coyle, A. J.; Liao, S.-M.; Maniatis, T. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 491.
6. Chien, Y.; Kim, S.; Bumeister, R.; Loo, Y.-M.; Kwon, S. W.; Johnson, C. L.;
Balakireva, M. G.; Romeo, Y.; Kopelovich, L.; Gale, M., Jr.; Yeaman, C.; Camonis,
J. H.; Zhao, Y.; White, M. A. Cell 2006, 127, 157.
and CDK2 while retaining TBK1 and IKK
The TBK1 cellular potency for 5a dropped to 1.46
due to poor permeability, while analogue 5b also gave sub-optimal
potency (0.139 M) in the TBK1 cell assay. Our second strategy to
e
enzymatic potencies.
l
M presumably
l
gain selectivity was through modification at the solvent channel
(2-substituent of the azabenzimidazole) since there are also differ-
ences among these kinases in this region (more prominent between
TBK1/IKKe and CDK2). After some library exploration work, it was
discovered that the analogue with an ortho-MeO phenyl at the 2-
7. Bodemann, B. O.; White, M. A. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 133.
8. Boehm, J. S.; Zhao, J. J.; Yao, J.; Kim, S. Y.; Firestein, R.; Dunn, I. F.; Sjostrom, S. K.;
Garraway, L. A.; Weremowicz, S.; Richardson, A. L.; Greulich, H.; Stewart, C. J.;
Mulvey, L. A.; Shen, R. R.; Ambrogio, L.; Hirozane-Kishikawa, T.; Hill, D. E.;
Vidal, M.; Meyerson, M.; Grenier, J. K.; Hinkle, G.; Root, D. E.; Roberts, T. M.;
Lander, E. S.; Polyak, K.; Hahn, W. C. Cell 2007, 129, 1065.
position and a 7-side chain containing a hydroxyl group (5c) had
9. Xie, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, B.; Lu, M.-K.; You, M.; Condorelli, G.; Wang, C.-Y.; Guan,
K.-L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 6474.
a balanced potency profile: 0.032/0.102
l
M against TBK1/IKK
e;
0.035 M in TBK1 cell assay, 0.870/4.65
l
lM against Aurora B/
10. Bamborough, P.; Christopher, J. A.; Cutler, G. J.; Dickson, M. C.; Mellor, G. W.;
Morey, J. V.; Patel, C. B.; Shewchuk, L. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 6236.
11. Bain, J.; Plater, L.; Elliott, M.; Shpiro, N.; Hastie, C. J.; Mclauchlan, H.; Klevernic,
I.; Simon, C.; Arthur, J. S. C.; Alessi, D. R.; Cohen, P. Biochem. J. 2007, 408, 297.
12. Feldman, R. I.; Wu, J. M.; Polokoff, M. A.; Kochanny, M. J.; Dinter, H.; Zhu, D.;
Biroc, S. L.; Alicke, B.; Bryant, J.; Yuan, S.; Buckman, B. O.; Lentz, D.; Ferrer, M.;
Whitlow, M.; Adler, M.; Finster, S.; Chang, Z.; Arnaiz, D. O. J. Biol. Chem. 2005,
280, 19867.
CDK2. Close analogues 5d–e also followed the same trend. As
shown above, our structure-based design approach took advantage
of the differences between TBK1/IKKe and CDK2/Aurora B at both
the gatekeeper position and the solvent channel and resulted in po-
tent and selective compounds 5b–e.
A representative synthesis of the lead compound 5c of this ser-
ies is illustrated in Scheme 1. The synthesis commenced with a tet-
ra-substituted pyridine 6. Treatment of 6 with 7 and POCl3 in
CH3CN gave 8 with the azabenzimidazole core structure installed.
Nucleophilic aromatic substitution at the 7-position of azabenzim-
idazole 8 with excess 2-hydroxyl-1,3-diamine 9 produced interme-
diate 10, which then underwent an amide coupling reaction to
yield the target compound 5c.
In summary, a series of novel azabenzimidazole analogues was
discovered and optimized against TBK1/IKKe kinases. Structure-
based design targeting the gatekeeper residues and the solvent
channel resulted in lead compounds (such as 5b–e) that showed
13. Prime, version 1.5; Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2010.
14. Glide, version 4.5, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2010. The homology model
structure was prepared using the default protein preparation workflow. Grids
were generated using the centroid of an arbitrary ligand placed in the ATP
binding site incorporating hydrogen bonding constraints to the hinge. Ligands
were prepared using proprietary in-house software. Docking was carried out
using the XP option and constrained to make both hydrogen bonds to the hinge
of the kinases. Five poses were retained for each ligand.
15. TBK1/IKK
e
enzyme assays: Inhibitory effect of compounds against TBK1 and
typical experiment, series of kinase
IKK was evaluated by IC50s. In
e
a
a
catalyzed reactions with different concentrations of an inhibitor were set up in
HEPES buffer with a kinase and its substrates (for TBK1, 3 nM recombinant full-
length TBK1 (Life Technologies, Madison. WI), 1.8
KRRRAL(pS)VASLPGL, Primm Biotech, Cambridge, MA), 30
MgCl2; for IKK 4 nM IKK 1.5 peptide substrate (5FAM-
AKELDQGSLCTpSFVGTLQ-NH2, 21st Century Biochemicals, Marlborough,
MA), ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2). For 10-point IC50 test, inhibitor
concentrations were usually started from 10 M, followed by nine half-log
lM CK1tide (5FAM-Ahx-
l
M ATP, and 10 mM
e
,
e,
lM
good TBK1 cellular activity and were selective for TBK1/IKKe over
Aurora B/CDK2 kinases. These compounds could serve as useful
5 lM
l
dilutions. Reactions were kept at room temperature for a pre-defined duration
of time, quenched using HEPES buffer containing EDTA, and then analyzed
probe compounds in the study of the complex cancer biology of
TBK1 and IKKe kinases.