NMR studies of new 3-aminophenol isomers
higher in 4a–h than in 5a–h compounds. H-4ph and H-6ph suffers
and the ‘Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación’ (SAF2009-11955). The
award of grant from the ‘Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y
Empresa, Junta de Andalucía’ to S. S. O. is gratefully acknowledged.
the same effect for the same reason.
The same behavior is observed in 13C NMR signals of C-2ph
,
C-4ph, and C-6ph, which appear more shielded in 5a–h than in
4a–h derivatives and their direct precursors (3e–h).
References
1H NMR signals of H-4ph and H-6ph in compounds 4a–h are
superimposed and appear as multiplets, and for this reason,
these signals cannot be completely assigned, except in 4f, where
the signals are well resolved.
[1] a) M. Bañez-Coronel, A. Ramírez de Molina, A. Rodríguez-González,
J. Sarmentero, M. A. Ramos, M. A. García-Cabezas, L. García-Oroz,
J. C. Lacal, Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2008, 8, 709–719; b) E. Hernando,
J. Sarmentero-Estrada, T. Koppie, C. Belda-Iniesta, V. Ramírez de Molina,
P. Cejas, C. Ozu, C. Le, J. J. Sánchez, M. González-Barón, J. Koutcher,
C. Cordón-Cardó, B. H. Bochner, J. C. Lacal, A. Ramírez de Molina,
Oncogene 2009, 28, 2425–2435; c) W. Cun See Too, M. Teng Wong,
L. Ling Few, M. Konrad, PLoS ONE, 2010, 5(9), e12999; d)
D. Gallego-Ortega, T. Gómez del Pulgar, F. Valdés-Mora, A. Cebrián,
J. C. Lacal, Adv. Enzyme Regul. 2011, 51, 183–194.
In compounds 5a–h, the 1H NMR signals of H-4ph and H-6ph are
well resolved, but they cannot be unequivocal assigned through
the HMBC and HMQC techniques. Consequently, these signals
can be considered interchangeable. C-4ph and C-6ph are inter-
changeable in both families as well.
[2] a) E. Malito, N. Sekulic, W. C. Too, M. Konrad, A. Lavie, J. Mol. Biol. 2006,
364, 136–151; b) L. Milanese, A. Espinosa, J. M. Campos, M. A. Gallo, A.
Entrena, ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 1216–1228.
[3] a) B. Rubio-Ruiz, A. Conejo-García, P. Ríos-Marco, M. P. Carrasco-
Jimenez, J. Segovia, C. Marco, M. A. Gallo, A. Espinosa, A. Entrena,
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 50, 154–162; b) B. Rubio-Ruiz, A. Conejo-
García, M. A. Gallo, A. Espinosa, A. Entrena, Magn. Reson. Chem.
2012, 50, 466–469.
[4] S. Schiaffino-Ortega, L. C. López-Cara, P. Ríos-Marco, M. P. Carrasco-
Jimenez, C. Marco, M. A. Gallo, A. Espinosa, A. Entrena. Biorg. Med.
Chem. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2013.09.003.
[5] a) H. A. Staab, M. Haenel, Chem. Ber. 1973, 106, 2190–2202; b) D. J.
Cram, H. Steinberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 5691–5704.
[6] M. Hesse, H. Meier, B. Zeeh, Spektroskopische Methoden in der
Organischen Chemie, 5th edn, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart- Nueva,
York, 1995.
Finally, the methylene group connected to the ether bond in
1
4a–h compounds appears less shielded as in H NMR as in 13C
NMR signals, than when this methylene is connected to amino
group in the 5a–h compounds.
In the rest of the molecule, no significant differences have been
found. The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of the linker and the cat-
ionic head are very similar in isomeric compounds of families 4 and 5.
In conclusion, two families of structural isomers bearing
3-aminophenol moiety (4a–h and 5a–h) and their direct precur-
sors (3e–h) have been unequivocally identified by 1D and 2D
NMR techniques. The only differences between both isomers are
the chemical shift of H-2ph, H-4ph, and H-6ph and of C-2ph, C-4ph
,
and C-6ph respectively in the 3-aminophenol moiety, which
appears more deshielding for 4a–h compounds than for 5a–h.
Thus, only one difference between two isomers is enough to
unequivocally identify them.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a project from the ‘Consejería de
Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa, Junta de Andalucía’ (P07-CTS-03210)
Additional supporting information may be found in the online
version of this article at the publisher’s web site.
Magn. Reson. Chem. (2013)
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/mrc