6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) to yield oxocarbenium
ions that react with enol acetate nucleophiles (Scheme 1).10
Sulfur is a larger and less electronegative atom than
oxygen, making the relative stabilities of intermediate
thiocarbenium and oxocarbenium ions difficult to predict,
though comparative studies have shown that the energetic
differencebetweenthese species issmall.11 Additionallythe
longer bonds between carbon and sulfur indicate that the
strong preference for the E-geometry of oxocarbenium
ions12 could be eroded for thiocarbenium ions, leading to
lower stereocontrol.
vinyl sulfide substrates. Mechanistic studies in our group
have revealed that oxidation rates are influenced by the
oxidation potential of the substrate and the stability of the
cation.13 Although allyl sulfides and isomeric vinyl sulfides
form the same thiocarbenium ion upon DDQ oxidation,
the lower oxidation potential of vinyl sulfides14 was ex-
pected to provide higher radical cation concentrations and
faster cation formation. This strategy has been shown to be
effective for acyliminium ion formation,15 whereby allylic
amides are unreactive toward DDQ while vinyl amides
react quickly. Vinyl sulfides are attractive substrates for
these processes because of their increasing accessibility
through a number of new metal mediated protocols for
their formation.16
Scheme 1. Heterocycle Synthesis through Oxidative CarbonÀ
Vinyl sulfide 9 was prepared through a sequence in
which the key step was a palladium-mediated coupling
between a thiol and a vinyl iodide.17 Exposing 918 to DDQ
provided 2 in 58% isolated yield within 10 min at 0 °C
through the same thiocarbenium ion that was formed
from allyl sulfide 1 (Scheme 3). Vinyl sulfide 10 also
proceeded through the oxidative cyclization reaction
smoothly, forming 5 with excellent diastereocontrol.
No overoxidation was observed. These results vali-
dated the strategy of employing vinyl sulfides rather
than allyl sulfides as substrates for oxidative thiocar-
benium ion formation.
Hydrogen Bond Cleavage
We demonstrated the viability of allylic sulfide sub-
strates in these reactions (Scheme 2) through the DDQ-
mediated conversion of 1 to 2. This transformation led to
the formation of variable amounts of enone 3 as a result of
the oxidation of 2. The addition of LiClO4 to the reaction
mixture reduced the formation of 3 to 4%, presumably due
to the stabilization of the radical anion that forms from the
initial electron transfer. Secondary sulfide 4 reacted with
DDQ to yield 5 as a satisfactory 10:1 ratio of diastereo-
mers, confirming that the E-thiocarbenium ion is the
dominant reactive species. The product of overoxidation
(6) was also formed in this transformation in 4% yield.
Benzyl sulfide 7 was converted to tetrahydrothiopyrone 8
with excellent stereocontrol. No overoxidation was ob-
served in this reaction. We postulate that the benzylic
carbonÀhydrogen bond in the product does not overlap
the p-orbitals of the aromatic ring, thereby slowing pro-
duct oxidation.
Scheme 3. Cyclizations of Vinyl Sulfide Substrates
(9) (a) Tu, W.; Liu, L.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 4184. (b) Tu, W.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
4567. (c) Liu, L.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3069.
(d) Liu, L.; Floreancig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5894.
(10) For recent examples of carbonÀcarbon bond formation through
DDQ-mediated carbonÀhydrogen bond oxidation, see: (a) Benfatti, F.;
Capdavila, M. G.; Zoli, L.; Benedetto, E.; Cozzi, P. G. Chem. Commun.
2009, 5919. (b) Hayashi, Y.; Itoh, T.; Ishikawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 3920. (c) Ghosh, A. K.; Cheng, X. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4108.
(d) Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
10429. (e) Son, Y. W.; Kwon, T. H.; Lee, J. K.; Pae, A. N.; Lee, J. Y.;
Cho, Y. S.; Min, S.-J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6500. (f) Reddy, B. V. S.;
Borkar, P.; Jadav, J. S.; Reddy, P. P.; Kunwar, A. C.; Sridhar, B.; Gree,
R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 1349. (g) Park, S. J.; Price, J. R.; Todd,
M. H. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 949.
Scheme 2. Allylic and Benzylic Sulfide Substrates
€
(11) (a) Osapay, K.; Delhalle, J.; Nsunda, K. M.; Rolli, E.; Houriet,
R.; Hevesi, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5028. (b) Apeloig, Y.; Karni,
€
M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1988, 625. (c) Grutzmacher, H.;
Marchand, C. M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 163, 287.
(12) Broecker, J. L.; Hoffmann, R. W.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 5006.
(13) Jung, H. H.; Floreancig, P. E. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10830.
(14) Directly appending electron donating groups to alkenes results
in a substantial lowering of the oxidation potential. See: Schepp, N. P.;
Johnston, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2872.
(15) (a) Brizgys, G. J.; Jung, H. H.; Floreancig, P. E. Chem. Sci. 2012,
3, 438. (b) Liu, L.; Floreancig, P. E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3152.
The formation of overoxidized products and our desire
toexpand thescopeofnucleophilicgroupsledustoexplore
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 7, 2012
1721