molecules because the silyl group is known to display an
electronic boron directing effect to the R-carbon from the
silyl group6 and less of an activating effect on the triple
bond than an alkyl substituent in the conventional hydro-
boration of alkynes with dialkylborane serving as the
electrophilic reagent.7 Since a copperꢀboryl complex
serves as a nucleophilic entity in the borylation reaction,2b
reactivity and/or selectivity complementary to hydrobora-
tion might be achievable. Herein, we report an efficient
borylation of silylalkynes with a phosphiteꢀcopper cata-
lyst to produce vicinal alkyldiboronates through the highly
regio- and stereoselective double addition of a boronate
moiety and H to silylalkynes.
Table 1. Borylation Reaction of 1-Phenyl-2-trimethylsilylethyne
Under Various Conditions
B2pin2
(equiv)
MeOH conv product yield of 4b
entry ligand
(equiv) (%)a
3b: 4b
(%)b
1
2
3
P(p-tol)3
P(p-tol)3
P(OEt)3
1.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.1
1.5
2.2
2
2.2
2.2
3
52
1<: >99
44
86
100 1<: > 99
100
100
13
1<: >99
1<: >99
ꢀ
89
4c P(OEt)3
89
5
6
7
P(OEt)3
xantphos
xantphos
0
4
1
78
>99: <1
>99: <1
80: 20
49 (3b)
83 (3b)
40 (3b)
Scheme 1. Borylation of 1-TMS-1-hexyne
2
100
100
8d xantphos
2.2
a Determined by GC analysis based on consumption of 2b. b Isolated
yield of purified diboronate 4b. c Reaction time was 17 h. d Reaction was
carried out at 70 °C.
Increasing the amount of B2pin2 (1) to 2.2 equiv relative
to acetylene substrate led to complete conversion to pro-
duct 4b in high yield (entry 2). Using P(OEt)3 as the ligand
instead of P(p-tol)3 efficiently afforded the same product10
(entries 3 and 4), and MeOH was necessary for high con-
version (entry 5). On the other hand, the bidentate ligand
xantphos (= 9,90-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diphenyl-phosphino)-
xanthene) selectively gave monoaddition product (3b) as a
single product (entries 6 and 7). Increasing reaction tem-
perature with excess B2pin2 resulted in a mixutre of 3b and
4b, but the alkenylboron compound was still the major
product with the xantphos ligand (entry 8).
While catalytic diborations of alkenes with diboron
compounds offer a straightforward route to diboronate
compounds,11 alkene diboration has been most success-
ful thus far with terminal alkenes,12 cyclic alkenes with
internal strain,12b,d and disubstituted alkenes12d,e by em-
ploying bis(catecholato)diboron, which is less stable
and more reactive than bis(pinacolato)diboron. The
present approach provides a complementary synthetic route
to diboronates.13 Furthermore, sterically encumbered
In initial experiments, we carried out the borylation of
1-trimethylsilyl-1-hexyne (see Supporting Information)
using our previously reported conditions (CuCl, NaOt-
Bu, P(p-tol)3, and 1.1 equiv B2pin2, 2 equiv MeOH in
THF)4b at 50 °C for 24 h. The reaction proceeded to 67%
conversion, which was higher than the t-butyl analogue,8
and a single product was isolated in 51% yield (Scheme 1).
The product was characterized as (Z)-(β-borylvinyl)silane,
whose formation could be explained by β-carbon attach-
ment of the boronate group from the TMS group and syn
addition of boron and H. A similar borylation was con-
ducted employing a more hindered but activated 1-phenyl-
2-trimethylsilylacetylene (2b) (Table 1, entry 1). The reac-
tion led to partial conversion and the formation of a single
isomeric product. Surprisingly, the isolated product was
determined to be a vicinal diboronate with the two boronyl
groups in a syn relationship, and no monoborylated
vinylsilane intermediate was detected. The stereochemistry
of the resulting 1,2-bis(boronate) was determined by sub-
sequent oxidation to the corresponding syn-1,2-diol.9
(11) For recent reviews, see: (a) Beletskaya, I.; Moberg, C. Chem.
Rev. 2006, 106, 2320–2354. (b) Burks, H. E.; Morken, J. P. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 4717–4725.
(12) For selected reports on diboration: (a) Baker, R. T.; Nguyen, P.;
Marder, T. B.; Westcott, S. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34,
1336–1338. (b) Ishiyama, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Miyaura, N. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 689–690. (c) Kliman, L. T.; Mlynarski, S. N.; Morken,
(6) (a) Uchida, K.; Utimoto, K.; Nozaki, H. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41,
2941–2942. (b) Hassner, A.; Soderquist, J. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977,
131, C1–C4. (c) Zweifel, G.; Backlund, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
3184–3185. (d) Hoshi, M.; Masuda, Y.; Arase, A. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1 1990, 3237–3241.
(7) Soderquist, J. A.; Colberg, J. C.; Valle, L. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 4873–4878.
(8) For comparison, 48% conversion of 1-t-butyl-1-octyne was ob-
tained under the same conditions.
(9) Page, P. C. B.; Rosenthal, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 46, 2573–
2586.
(10) When the same reactions were conducted at room temperature
for 12 h with P(p-tol)3 and P(OEt)3, respectively, both reactions gave
similar conversions, 79% and 80%. However, ∼3% of the monoaddi-
tion product (3b) was detected by GC in the latter reaction along with the
major product 4b. The results indicate that the phosphite system might
be less efficient than the phosphine in the double borylation. However,
the reactivity difference is so small that the phosphite can be used in the
double borylation at higher reaction temperature with the same effi-
ciency as the phosphine.
J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13210–13211. (d) Ramırez, J.; Sanau,
´
ꢀ
ꢀ
M.; Fernandez, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5194–5197. (e)
Trudeau, S.; Morgan, J. B.; Shrestha, M.; Morken, J. P. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 9538–9544.
(13) For a NHCꢀCu catalyzed borylation of terminal alkynes to
vicinal diboronates, see: Lee, Y.; Jang, H.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 18234–18235.
(14) For copper-catalyzed borylation reactions of β,β-disubstituted
or R,β-disubstituted R,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds, see: (a)
´ ´
Lillo, V.; Prieto, A.; Bonet, A.; Dıaz-Requejo, M. M.; Ramırez, J.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
Perez, P. J.; Fernandez, E. Organometallics 2009, 28, 659–662. (b)
O’Brien, J. M.; Lee, K.-s.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 10630–10663. (c) Feng, X.; Yun, J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 13609–
13612.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 10, 2012
2607