10.1002/cctc.201800614
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
the cultivation, cells were collected by centrifugation and suspended in 100
μL 100 mM potassium-phosphate buffer (KPB) (pH 8.0). Intact cells were
suspended (10 μL) in the reaction mixture (100 μL), which consisted of 100
mM KPB (pH 8.0), 2 mM phenol, 1.5 mM 4-aminoantipyrine, 2 U
horseradish peroxidase, and a substrate, such as (R)-1a, 2a, or (RS)-2c.
The progress of the reaction was monitored by HPLC with an OD-H
column (ϕ 0.46 cm × 25 cm, Daicel Chiral Technologies Co. Ltd, Tokyo,
JAPAN) using a solvent system of hexane: 2-propanol = 9:1 (Absorbance:
220 nm, Flow rate: 1 mL/min, column temperature: 30°C). The reaction
was quenched by addition of 1M NaOH. The aqueous phase was extracted
by hexane (40 mL × 3), and then, the hexane layer was dried in vacuo.
The remaining product was analyzed by 1H-NMR and by optical rotation
measurement. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on the Bruker Biospin
AVANCE II 400 (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany) system. Optical
rotation was determined by ATAGO AP-300 (Atago Co., Tokyo, Japan) by
using a 10.1-mm cell. The optical purity of the isolated (R)-2c was 95.7%
DNA sequence analysis
Nucleotide sequencing was performed using the dideoxynucleotide chain
termination method. Sequencing reactions were carried out with a BigDye®
Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
CA., USA), and the reaction mixture was applied to an ABI PRIZM 310
Genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA., USA).
1
e.e. with an isolation yield of 46.2% (19.8 mg, 0.091 mmol). The H-NMR
spectra were shown as follows: 2c (400 MHz; DMSO-d6) δH (ppm) 7.18-
7.43 (m, 9H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 2.33 (s, 2H). [ɑ]D27 -9.99 ° (c 1.0, EtOH) (lit. [ɑ]D
20 -10.6 (c 1.1, EtOH) for the (R)-enantiomer, [ɑ]D 20 +10.8 (c 2.18, EtOH)
for the (S)-enantiomer.). [14]
Purification of wild-type pkDAO and variant pkDAOs
All enzymes were purified by the same procedure. E. coli cells were
suspended in 5 volumes of 10 mM KPB (pH 8.0) containing 0.1% 2-
mercaptoethanol and disrupted by sonication for 20 min at 180 W using
Insonator 201M (Kubota Co., Tokyo, Japan). After the cell debris was
removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 30 min, the supernatant
was obtained as cell-free extract. The enzyme in the cell-free extract was
then fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation. The precipitant of 20-
33% saturation fraction was suspended in 10 mM KPB (pH 8.0) containing
0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol and dialyzed against the same buffer. The
dialyzed enzyme solution was applied to a DEAE-Toyopearl column (ϕ6.0
cm × 13 cm), and the absorbed enzyme was eluted by a linear gradient of
0-0.5 M NaCl. The enzyme solution was next saturated to 20% ammonium
sulfate and applied to a Butyl-Toyopearl column (ϕ3.0 cm × 22.0 cm). A
step-wise elution was done with 10 mM KPB buffer containing 20, 10, and
0% of ammonium sulfate saturation. The final preparation gave a single
band on SDS-PAGE. Protein concentration was measured using the
Bradford method. The specific activity for (R)-1a (20 mM) of the purified
variants R283G, Y228L/R283G, I230A/R283G, I230C/R283G, and
I230F/R283G were calculated to be 2.2, 18.3, 0.58, 0.16, and 0.071 U/mg,
respectively. The specific activity toward (R)-phenylalanine (3) of the
purified wild-type and variant Y228L were shown to be 7.5 and 0.18 U/mg,
respectively.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Exploratory
Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO) Asano Active
Enzyme Molecule Project from the Japan Science and
Technology Agency (JST) (Grant Number JPMJER1102). This
research was also supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific
Research S from The Japan Society for Promotion of Sciences
(No. 17H06169) to Y. Asano. We thank Dr. Kimiyasu Isobe for his
critical reading of the manuscript.
Keywords: Chiral amine • Amine oxidase • D-amino acid
oxidase • Deracemization • Oxidation
[1]
a) D. Ghislieri, N. J. Turner, Top Catal. 2014, 57, 284-300; b) J.S. Shin,
B.G. Kim, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 25, 426-432.
M.T. Reetz, K. Schimossek, Chima 1996, 50, 668-669.
D. Koszelewski et al, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4810-4812.
Enzyme assay
[2]
[3]
[4]
The oxidase activity was assayed at 30°C by measuring quinoneimine dye
formation by determining absorbance at 505 nm with a spectrophotometer.
The reaction mixture contained the substrate, 100 mM KPB (pH 8.0), 2 mM
phenol, 1.5 mM 4-aminoantipyrine, 2 U horseradish peroxidase, 10%
DMSO and varying concentrations of the enzyme. The substrate was
dissolved in DMSO. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount
of enzyme that produces 1 μmol of hydrogen peroxide per min.
a) N. J. Turner, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2003, 5, 567-573; b) H. Kohls, F.
Steffen-Munsberg, M. Höhne, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19, 180-192.
a) M. J. Abrahamson, E. Vázquez-Figuerosa, N. B. Woodall, J. C. Moore,
A. S. Bommarius, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 16, 3969-3972; b) M. J.
Abrahamson, J. W.Wong, A. S. Bommarius, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 17,
1780-1786.
[5]
[6]
a) M. Alexeeva, A. Enright, M. J. Dawson, M. Mahmoudian, N. J. Turner,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3177-3180; b) D. Ghislieri, A. P. Green,
S. C. Willies, I. Rowles, A. Frank, G. Grogan, N. J. Turner, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2013, 135, 10863-10869; c) S. Herter, F. Medina, S. Wagschal, C.
Benhaim, F. Leipold, N. J. Turner, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 26, 1338-
1346.
Kinetic parameter
The kinetic parameter was determined by the same method as described
in the section of the enzyme assay using 1-20 mM (R)-1a, 1-5 mM 2a, and
1-7 mM (RS)-2c, (R)-2c, and (S)-2c. The reaction mixture contained the
substrate, 100 mM KPB (pH 8.0), 2 mM phenol, 1.5 mM 4-aminoantipyrine,
2 U horseradish peroxidase, 10% DMSO, and the enzyme at varying
concentrations.
The initial velocity was measured spectrophotometrically with the software
Spectra Manager Version
experiments were conducted in triplicate. The Michaelis constant (Km) was
determined by using the software KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software,
Reading, PA., USA). Catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) was calculated by using
these results.
[7]
[8]
R. S. Heath, M. Pontini, B. Bechi, N. J. Turner, ChemCatChem 2014, 6,
996-1002.
a) K. Yasukawa, S. Nakano, Y. Asano, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53,
4428-4431; b) N. Kawahara, K. Yasukawa, Y. Asano, Green Chem. 2017,
19, 418-424.
2 (JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan). These
[9]
S. Nakano, K. Yasukawa, T. Tokiwa, T. Ishikawa, E. Ishitsubo, N. Matsuo,
S. Ito, H. Tokiwa, Y. Asano, J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 10736-10743.
[10] a) L. Pollegioni, G. Molla, Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 276-283; b) A.
Caligiuri, P. D’Arrigo, E. Rosini, D. Tessaro, G. Molla, S. Servi, L.
Pollegioni, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2183-2190; c) L. Pollegioni, S.
Sacchi, L. Caldinelli, A. Boselli, M. S. Pilone, L. Piubelli, G. Molla, Curr.
Protein Pept. Sci. 2007, 8, 600-618.
Identification of the product by enzymatic deracemization reaction
The reaction mixture (40 mL) consisted of 100 mM glycine-NaOH buffer
(pH 9.0), (RS)-2c (50.0 mg, 0.197 mmol), 100 mM NaBH4,and 4 U purified
enzyme was stirred at 1.3×103 rpm at 30°C for 1 hr in a 1 L eggplant flask.
For internal use, please do not delete. Submitted_Manuscript
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.