A facile approach for the creation of heteroionic lanthanidomesogens-containing uniform films with enhanced luminescence efficiency

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.109050

Adducts of Eu(III), Tb(III), Gd(III) and La(III) tris(β-diketonate) forming mesophases in close temperature ranges were synthesized. The near structural features of these lanthanidomesogens render them suitable for obtaining homogeneous binary mixtures th

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.109050

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
Materials Today: Proceedings 2S (2015) S358 – S363
Joint 3rd UK-China Steel Research Forum & 15th CMA-UK Conference on Materials Science and
Engineering
Exploring the structure of high temperature, iron-bearing liquids
Martin Wildinga,*, Chris Benmoreb, Rick Weberc, John Parised, Lena Lazarevad, Lawrie Skinnerb,c,
Oliver Aldermanc and Antony Tamalonisc
aDepartment of Mathematics and Physics, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3BZ, UK
bX-ray science division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL 60439, USA
cMaterials Development Inc. Arlington Heights, Il 60004, USA
d.Department of Geosciences Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2100, USA
Abstract
This paper describes the direct measurements of the structure of iron-bearing liquids using a combination of containerless techniques and in-
situ high energy x-ray diffraction. These capabilities provide data that is important to help model and optimize processes such as smelting, steel
making, and controlling slag chemistry. A successful programme of liquid studies has been undertaken and the Advanced Photon Source using
these combined techniques which include the provision of gas mixing and the control of pO2 and the changing influence of mixed valance
elements. It is possible to combine rapid image acquisition with quenching of liquids to obtain the full diffraction patterns of deeply
supercooled liquids and the metastable supercooled liquid regime, where the liquid structures and viscosity change most dramatically, can also
be explored.
©© 22001154TThheeAAuuththoorsr.sP. uPbulbislhisehdebdybEylsEelvsieevriLertdL. tTdh.is is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the Chinese Materials Association in the UK (CMA-UK). This is an open access article under
Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the Chinese Materials Association in the UK (CMA-UK).
the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)
Keywords: High energy X-ray diffraction; liquid structure; containerless techniques.
*Corresponding author. Tel 44-1970-622816; fax 44-1970-622826
E-mail address: mbw@aber.ac.uk
1. Introduction
For any liquid based process, the structure of the liquid will control the physical and chemical properties. These liquid structures
reflect many different contributing phenomena including the temperature-dependent equilibria of liquid species, preferred
bonding and density fluctuations, all of which will control the structure and structure-dependent processes such as crystallization
and viscosity. Although glasses have often been used as a proxy for liquid, the vitrification process itself reflects a complicated,
cooling rate-dependent process involving partial structural relaxation, emphasizing the need to determine the structures of liquids
in situ and the requirement for careful structural modelling.
Containerless techniques such as aerodynamic levitation mean however that the contribution to the total scattered signal can be
reduced and, when used in combination with X-rays or neutrons [1-3], diffraction data for a variety of metallic and oxide liquids
2214-7853 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the Chinese Materials Association in the UK (CMA-UK).
doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2015.05.050

Martin Wilding et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2S (2015) S358 – S363
359
can be obtained. In liquids that contain redox variable elements the structure of the liquids is strongly influenced by the oxidation
state of that element. Containerless methods can be adapted to control the partial pressure of oxygen and the structural changes
that result from changing valance state determined. These capabilities provide the structural data that has potential to optimize
processes such as smelting, steel making and the control of slag chemistry.
Combined high energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD) and containerless measurements have been performed on a variety of
refractory oxide liquids, including Y2O3-Al2O3[4], Al2O3-SiO2 [5], CaO-Al2O3[6], MgO-SiO2 [7] and CaO-SiO2[8]. These data
show changes in structure of the liquid both as a function of composition and on cooling, suggesting changes in the structure of
the supercooled liquid than can be correlated with transport properties (viscosity)[8].
In this contribution we demonstrate the direct measurements of the structure of iron-bearing liquids by using these combined
techniques. We will outline high energy X-ray diffraction studies for a range of iron bearing silicate liquids and show the
changes in structure of these liquids as fO2 is changed in both stable and supercooled liquids.
1.1 Aerodynamic levitation
Aerodynamic levitation is a containerless technique that has proved to be an extremely successful technique for in situ liquid
study. A bead of ceramic precursor is levitated by a gas jet and laser heated to form a spherical liquid drop 2-3mm in diameter.
The liquid drop is suspended in the purpose-designed and water-cooled nozzle and heated by a 240W continuous wave CO2 laser
to temperatures of up to 3000 K [2, 3, 9]. The absence of heterogeneous nucleation sites means that the liquids can be
supercooled by several hundred degrees before crystallisation occurs and the metastable regime explored. Aerodynamic
levitation furnaces can be incorporated into X-ray beamline infrastructure; the entire levitator is enclosed in a stainless steel
chamber to allow operation under Class 1 conditions and Kapton® windows allow the sample environment to be operated in
transmission mode. A video camera is used to monitor levitation and a pyrometer used to determine temperature (Figure 1). The
laser path length is minimised to allow for more stable levitation and access to the supercooled regime.
1.2 High energy X-ray diffraction
High energy X-rays, with incident energies of 115keV have the advantage of acting as a bulk probe and scattering data for the
liquid sample can be collected to high values of scattering vector with minimal correction for absorption and energy [10]. The
entire liquid diffraction pattern can be collected using a 2D detector with a maximums value of scattering vector (Q) in excess of
20Å-1 ensuring good real space resolution. This diffraction technique has proved very useful in identifying the characteristics of
medium range order (usually masked in neutron diffraction data for oxides). An aerodynamic levitation furnace has been
integrated into the infrastructure of the high energy beamline, 6-ID-D at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National
Laboratory. A recent development at the APS has been to use a Perkin Elmer amorphous silicon detector with rapid acquisition
such that the entire pattern can be collected in 200ms. This rapid data collection can be synchronised with the laser heating and
frames collected as the laser is blocked, meaning that structural changes in the metastable supercooled regime can be discerned
and the crystallisation and vitrification processes observed [11].
1.3 Controlled atmosphere
The aerodynamic levitator is totally and enclosed and different gas mixtures can be used as a levitation gas. Previous
measurements have used argon or oxygen as a levitation gas, however we have now begun to explore a range of oxidation
conditions by using mixtures of CO and CO2 in the levitation gas. This added dimension allows a range of liquids to be explored
as a function of composition, temperature and fO2.
2
Experimental methodology
The liquids studied in the MgO-SiO2 system ranging from orthosilicate and an inosilicate (pyroxene) compositions and are used
as a basis for the set of experiments used to evaluate the structural role of iron. The study of three FeO-MgO-SiO2 composition
liquids is discussed here with the ratio of FeO/(FeO+MgO) is fixed to 0.50. The starting material was prepared by grinding the
appropriate amounts of iron, magnesium and silicon oxides together and pressing to form a pellet that was then sintered at 1573K
in air to form a hard ceramic. Three compositions were studied the orthosilicate ((Fe,Mg)2SiO2. 33 mole % SiO2) and pyroxene
((Fe,Mg)SiO3, 50 mole % SiO2) compositions and one intermediate (42 mole % SiO2). Beads of approximately 2-3mm (~40mg)
were made by fusing this ceramic material on a copper hearth. The precursor bead of sintered ceramic material is levitated in the
aerodynamic levitation furnace installed as part of the X-ray beam line infrastructure and heated until a drop is formed.
X-ray measurements were made at 6–ID-D using X-rays of incident energy 100.25 keV (wavelength, O=0.1237 Å). 2D

360
Martin Wilding et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2S (2015) S358 – S363
diffraction patterns were obtained for stable liquids with 0.5 second exposure for each image; each measurement of the stable
liquid is the sum of 100 frames. The supercooled liquids were studied by collecting 30 frames of 200ms as the liquid is
quenched. The first five frames are held in the detector buffer and when quenched these five frames are averaged to represent the
stable liquid diffraction pattern; the remaining 25 frames reflect the changing structure as the sample is cooled. The temperature
of the cooling drop is measured by pyrometer.
Each diffraction pattern is a 2D image that is then processed using the FIT2D package and a one dimensional pattern obtained by
integrating over all pixels in the two dimensional array [12]. CeO2 is used to calibrate the detector for the detector to sample
ସగ
distance and other detector parameters. The total structure factor (S(Q)) (where ܳ ൌ •‹ ߠ )for each composition was obtained
ఒ
using PDFgetX2 [13]. As reported by other authors, the advantage of using HEXRD is that corrections for absorption and
attenuation are minimised since the X-rays act as a bulk probe. The total structure factor can be obtained straightforwardly by
subtracting background (empty instrument) contributions and by correcting for the Q-dependence of the X-ray form factors and
Compton scattering, normalising to self-scattering at high Q.
Four different levitation mixtures were used, with the gas mixtures are controlled by mass flow controller. The levitation gas is
formed by mixing 5% CO-Ar and 5% CO2-Ar gases in the ratios 4:1, 3:2, 2:3 and 3:2. The samples were recovered following
each experiment to determine weight loss and for chemical analysis. The range of temperature and fO2 explored as part of this
study is shown in figure 2 the fraction of is shown, based on thermodynamic calculations and Mössbauer studies of iron in
silicate liquids.
Figure 2 The range of fO2 sampled (pattern) in
the experiments discussed below, the contours
are the fraction of Fe3+/6Fe
Figure 1: The aerodynamic levitation furnace installed at
beamline 6 ID D (advanced photon source). Incident X-
rays are correlated and emerge from the brass tube the
amorphous silicon detector is behind the furnace.
Temperature is monitored by a pyrometer and the video
camera is used to monitor sample positon.
3
Results

Martin Wilding et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2S (2015) S358 – S363
361
The total structure factor (S(Q)) for the (Fe,Mg)SiO3 composition is shown in figure 3 for the four gas mixtures. As with most
liquid diffraction data the S(Q) comprises a series of broad peaks that represent the partial contributions of atom pairs which are
damped to high Q. There are two prominent peaks at low Q at 2.1 and 4.7 Å-1. These two features are the sum of each partial
contribution and do not correspond to specific features in real space. Nevertheless the changes with position and intensity with
changing CO/CO2 indicate changes in the liquid structure. In figure 4 the pair distribution function for the (Fe,Mg)SiO3 liquid is
shown, obtained by Fourier transform of the S(Q). This also comprises a series of overlapping partial contributions, the main
structural unit in silicates is the SiO4 tetrahedron and this is reflected in an approximately Gaussian feature centered on the Si-O
distance of 1.65Å, this peak apparently changes in intensity as a function of CO:CO2 although is due to the overlap between Mg-
O and Fe-contributions. Since magnesium scatters X-rays weakly the differences in intensity and position indicate the changing
local environment surrounding iron, this does not however vary systematically with changing fO2. Iron can adopt two
configurations in the liquid, octahedral (FeO6) and tetrahedral (FeO4) units [14], these have Fe-O distances that depend on the
valance state of iron. The amount of ferric iron is expected to change as a function of CO:CO2, the range of fO2. sampled (Figure
2) would indicate that in the most oxidizing compositions the fraction of will be 0.2 however the changes in structure do not
show a simple equilibrium between FeO4 and FeO6 units and the changes in intensity and position of the Fe-O peaks do not very
systematically with Fe3+ /6Fe, the peaks are broader for the 2:3 and 3:2 mixtures for example and would suggest the structures
are complicated by interactions between Fe2+ and Fe3+ even at low Fe3+ concentrations.
Figure 4. The real space transform of the S(Q) data shown
in figure 3. The first peak in this pair correlation function is
the Si-O correlation, centred at 1.6 Å. This overlaps with
Fe-O and mg-O correlations and these change with fO2.
Although the most oxidised composition has a stronger
correlation the other gas mixtures show a range of Fe-O
local environments.
Figure 3. The total structure factor for an (Fe,Mg)SiO3
composition liquid as a function of gas mixture. There are
clear changes in the structure of this liquid, evidenced by the
changes in the first and second dominant peaks.
The viscosity of silicate (and other liquids) depends on temperate and more subtly on the temperature-dependence of the melt
structure, formalised for example in the Adam-Gibbs model of structural relaxation [15]. These changes occur in the metastable
supercooled regime which can be accessed by rapid data acquisition, as demonstrated for CaSiO3 liquids [8]. Interpretation of the
structural changes that occur is difficult but an indication of the structural change can be made by evaluating the changes in peak-
height or integration between common (isosbestic) points in the diffraction pattern. The quenched liquid data for these iron-
bearing silicates varies as a function of both silica content and as the ratio of CO:CO2 is changed. In figures 5 and 6 the
temperature dependence of the (Fe,Mg)SiO3 liquid is shown for two gas mixtures together with the patterns for the glasses
produced as these liquids are quenched. As well as an expected sharpening of the main correlations on quenching there are
changes in position and intensity that suggest structural changes on cooling and this differ depending on the fO2 and according
the Fe3+/6Fe.
4
Future work
The examples presented here are restricted to a series of iron-bearing magnesium silicates, however there is potential to explore a
variety of liquid compositions of relevance to the steel industry. These include oxide systems such as CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2
with iron or other transition metals added [16, 17]. The role of individual oxide components can be explored by traverses across
phase diagrams and complements other studies on the same systems such as viscosity and thermodynamic measurements and

362
Martin Wilding et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2S (2015) S358 – S363
measurements of the activity on iron. From the limited data presented above the liquid structures and by extension the physical
and chemical properties of these liquids do not vary linearly with either temperature or fO2 and accordingly provides a fertile
area for future study. We have presented data on iron bearing liquids but liquids with other transition metals or combinations of
transition metals can also be explored, for example data have been recently collected on cobalt-bearing silicates and studies of
nickel and titanium-bearing systems can be easily undertaken. Combinations of components such as iron and titanium and their
response to fO2 can be studied. The role of oxides (e.g. P2O5 [18]) which are known to have a dramatic effect on the Fe3+/6Fe can
be explored over a range of compositions and their partial structural role and specific role in slag compositions explored.
Although refractory oxide liquids have only been discussed here, the combined HEXRD and levitation studies can be extended to
of metallic systems and studies of metallic liquids as they are progressively oxidized are possible. Similarly there are no
restrictions on the composition of the levitating gas, we report the CO/CO2 mixtures but more reducing conditions can be
provided (H2/CO2) and the role of sulphur, for example, explored.
Figure 5 The temperature-dependent total structure
factor for (FeMg)SiO3 composition liquids quenched to
form a glass, the inset is changes in the pair correlation
function (D(r )), the levitation gas was CO:CO2 mixture
of 2:3, glasses could not be produced in more oxidising
conditions. Note the small crystal peaks at high
Figure 6 The temperature-dependent total structure factor
for the (FeMg)SiO3 composition under more reducing
conditions (was CO:CO2 mixture of 4:1), again the inset is
the D(r).
temperature; these are not present in the glass.
5
Summary
We have shown that levitation experiments can be combined with high energy X-ray diffraction to determine the liquid structure
for refractory systems including iron-bearing silicates. Containerless techniques further provide the opportunity to control the
redox state of iron and other transition metals by gas mixing and by using a mixture of CO and CO2 in the levitation gas a range
of fO2 conditions can be explored. The results for a series of iron-bearing silicate liquids show that by controlling the fO2 of the
levitation gas different Fe2+/Fe3+ mixtures can be achieved which strongly influence the liquid structure. When rapid quenching is
combined with fast data acquisition the structural changes during the vitrification process can also be studies and these also show
significant variation with the partial pressure of oxygen. These capabilities can be used to provide data that is important to help
model and optimize processes such as smelting, steel making, and the control of slag chemistry.
.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the U.S. DOE Argonne National Laboratory under contract number DE-AC02-06CH11357. The
authors thank Guy Jennings for technical help with the fast X-ray data acquisition.
References
[1] R. Weber, C. Benmore, Q. Mei and M. Wilding, Synchrotron Radiation In Materials Science (2009).
[2] J. K. R. Weber, J. E. Rix, K. J. Hiera, J. A. Tangeman, C. J. Benmore, R. T. Hart, J. E. Siewenie and L. J. Santodonato,
Physics And Chemistry Of Glasses 46 (2005), p. 487.

Martin Wilding et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2S (2015) S358 – S363
363
[3] J. K. R. Weber and P. C. Nordine, Microgravity Science and Technology 7 (1995), p. 279.
[4] M. C. Wilding, M. Wilson, C. J. Benmore, J. K. R. Weber and P. F. McMillan, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 15
(2013), p. 8589.
[5] M. C. Wilding, G. N. Greaves, Q. V. Van, O. Majerus and L. Hennet, Synchrotron Radiation In Materials Science (2009).
[6] Q. Mei, C. J. Benmore, J. Siewenie, J. K. R. Weber and M. Wilding, Journal Of Physics-Condensed Matter 20 (2008).
[7] M. C. Wilding, C. J. Benmore and J. K. R. Weber, Journal of Materials Science 43 (2008), p. 4707.
[8] C. J. Benmore, J. K. R. Weber, M. C. Wilding, J. Du and J. B. Parise, Physical Review B 82 (2010).
[9] R. Weber, Melt Chemistry, Relaxation, And Solidification Kinetics Of Glasses (2005).
[10] J. Neuefeind, C. J. Benmore, B. Tomberli and P. A. Egelstaff, Journal Of Physics-Condensed Matter 14 (2002), p. L429.
[11] J. K. R. Weber, C. J. Benmore, G. Jennings, M. C. Wilding and J. B. Parise, Nuclear Instruments & Methods In Physics
Research Section A-Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors And Associated Equipment 624 (2010), p. 728.
[12] A. P. Hammersley, S. O. Svensson, M. Hanfland, A. N. Fitch and D. Hausermann, High Pressure Research 14 (1996), p.
235.
[13] X. Y. Qiu, J. W. Thompson and S. J. L. Billinge, Journal of Applied Crystallography 37 (2004), p. 678.
[14] J. W. E. Drewitt, C. Sanloup, A. Bytchkov, S. Brassamin and L. Hennet, Physical Review B 87 (2013).
[15] G. Adam and J. H. Gibbs, Journal Of Chemical Physics 43 (1965), p. 139.
[16] F. Kongoli and A. Yazawa, Materials Transactions 44 (2003), p. 2130.
[17] H. M. Henao, F. Kongoli and K. Itagaki, Materials Transactions 46 (2005), p. 812.
[18] M. J. Toplis, D. B. Dingwell and G. Libourel, Contributions To Mineralogy And Petrology 117 (1994), p. 293.