10
M.C. Silva et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 77 (2012) 9–14
for 30 s. The homogenate was filtered in organza cloth and cen-
trifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min, at 4 ◦C [18]. The obtained solution
was subjected to precipitation by adding cold acetone until reach-
ing 65% (v/v). After a rest from 12 to 14 h, at −18 ◦C, the homogenate
was centrifuged at 11,000× g for 15 min, at 4 ◦C. The supernatant
was collected and acetone was subsequently recovered by distilla-
tion in a rotary evaporator, at controlled temperature of 56 ◦C. The
obtained precipitate after the removal of the acetone by a treatment
in gridge during 72 h was redissolved in 15 mL sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 6.5 and then used in the dye removal studies.
Fig. 1. The molecular-structure of reactive blue 21 dye.
2.3. Determination of enzyme activity
The activity was determined according to Khan and Robinson
[19], using as reaction medium: 1.5 mL of guaiacol (Vetec; 97%, v/v)
1% (v/v); 0.4 mL of H2O2 (Vetec, PA) 0.3% (v/v); 0.1 mL of enzyme
and 1.2 mL of 0.05 mol L−1 phosphate buffer pH 6.5. The reaction
was monitorized during 5 min at 30 ◦C using a Spectrovision spec-
trophotometer coupled to a thermostatic bath.
One unit of peroxidase activity represents the oxidation of mol
of guaiacol during 1 min in the assay conditions and it was calcu-
lated using data relative to the linear portion of the curve.
peroxidase as biocatalyst. The decolorization obtained was 95–96%
after 4 h of reaction at pH 3.0.
Despite these previous investigations have shown that PC dyes
unknown. The knowledge of the metabolites formed during the
decolorization of textile dyes by plant peroxidases is a way for the
understanding of the break up mechanism of complex structures
chemically stable, by the enzymes [11].
Many treatments can be efficient in the decolorization, but it
is essential to know if there is formation of toxic products during
the process. A valuable technique to evaluate the toxicity of the
In general it becomes very important for a bioremediation tech-
nology to assess the toxicity of the pollutants and metabolites
formed after their degradation in order to test out the feasibility
of the technique [15].
There are few studies to assess the toxicity of dyes and the
products formed during their enzymatic degradation. Da Silva and
coworkers [16] observed the reduction of Artemia salina mortality
after decolorization reactions of Drimarene Blue X-3LR (DMBLR),
Drimarene Rubinol X-3LR (DMR), and Drimarene Blue CL-R (RBBR)
by horsehadish peroxidase.
The metabolites formed after degradation of remazol red by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa BCH were more toxic than the parental
molecule [15].
In this work study, the use of the turnip peroxidase in the decol-
orization of the PC dye RB21 is studied. In this context, the effect
of parameters such H2O2, dye and enzyme concentrations, as well
as contact time has been investigated to optimize the system con-
ditions. The toxicity of the dye both before and after the enzymatic
dye was evaluated by utilizing lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa) as a
bioindicator.
Moreover, we here report the identification of the major
metabolites of the treatment of the PC dye RB21 with turnip perox-
idase by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS).
2.4. Dye removal studies
Experiments were conducted to assess the turnip peroxidase
catalyzed removal of phthalocyanine dye in aqueous phase. The
experiments were carried out at a constant temperature (30 ◦C) by
varying the process parameters such as dye, H2O2 and enzyme con-
centrations [20]. Initially the enzymatic reactions were conducted
in sodium phosphate buffer, 0.05 mol L−1, pH 7.0 (1.2 mL), contain-
ing: (1) H2O2 100 mol L−1 (0.4 mL), (2) the dye Remazol Turquoise
G 133%, at concentration of 50 mg L−1 (1.5 mL) and 0.1 mL of enzy-
matic solution for estimated the optimum contact time.
The reaction mixture was incubated in a spectrophotometer
coupled to a thermostatic bath. The monitorization of the substrate
consumption was carried out at 624 nm which corresponds to the
maximum absorption of Remazol Turquoise G 133%. The calcula-
tion to determine the color removal percentage of the dyes was
made according to the equation:
absorbancyinitial − absorbancyfinal
× 100
absorbancyinitial
Subsequent series of experiments were performed by varying the
concentrations of dye concentration (from 10 to 50 mg L−1), H2O2
dose (from 50 to 500 mol L−1) and enzyme concentration (from
1.62 to 26.16 U mL−1) to understand the optimum conditions for
dye removal. Reactions were performed also using multiple or sin-
gle additions of H2O2.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Dye
The HPLC–MS analyses were performed using a liquid chro-
matographic system (Thermo Surveyor with gradient pump, auto
sampler and diode array detector – DAD) coupled to a mass spec-
trometer Thermo LXQ Linear Ion Trap with electrospray ionization
(ESI+) and a diode array detector.
The textile dye RB21 was kindly provided by DyStar (Brasil)
and were used for degradation experiments without any further
purification. The molecular-structure of the dye is shown in Fig. 1
[17].
The samples were filtered through ultrafiltration membranes
(Millipore) with molecular weight cut 50 kDa, before injection into
the chromatograph.
2.2. Obtention of the enzymatic extract
A volume of 20 L of sample was injected and the chromato-
graphic separation was performed on a Hypersil GOLD column
(100 mm × 4.6 mm). Methanol/water (acidified 1%, v/v) was used
The enzyme was extracted from turnip roots purchased from
local market. The roots (with peel) were washed in water and cut
into small uniform pieces. Turnip roots (300 g) were homogenized
in a blender with 100 mL of 0.05 mol L−1 pH 6.5 phosphate buffer
as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1
.