Table 1 Investigation of the recyclability of MOF rodsa
from nano- to micrometer by a simple change of reaction
times. PXRD patterns show that these particles have an
identical unit cell regardless of a wide range of length distribu-
tions. Furthermore, the oxidation of styrene has been success-
fully demonstrated with Mn(III)–porphyrin MOF rods. The
catalytic activity and lifetime were dramatically improved and
the self-degradation of catalysts was successfully blocked
by the immobilization of Mn(III)–porphyrin through MOF
formation. In addition, MOF rods show good recyclability
without losing their catalytic activity after 5 runs.
Number of catalytic cycles
1
2
3
4
5
TONc
888
900
893
891
885
a
Reaction conditions; styrene: 0.48 mmol, oxidant: 0.24 mmol, MOF
rods: 0.24 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 mmol (2000 : 1000 : 1), CH2Cl2: 1 mL, reaction time:
b
2 h, rt. Oxidant: 2-tert-butylsulfonyliodosylbenzene. Determined
c
by GC with undecane as an internal standard (2000 eq.).
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the
Korea Research Foundation Program (No. 20110004727) and
Priority Research Centers Program (NRF 2011-0018396)
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
(MEST).
a dramatic change in the turnover number (TON). In addition,
the catalyst lifetime was dramatically extended from approxi-
mately 2 hours to greater than 6 hours because of the formation
of Mn(III)–porphyrin in the MOF (Fig. 2). Self-degradation of
catalysts by oxo-bridged dimer formation was successfully blocked
by the immobilization of catalysts through the MOF strategy.14
Furthermore, the MOF rods obtained after the reaction were
separated by centrifugation and reused 5 times. As shown in
Table 1, they show outstanding reusability without losing their
catalytic activity significantly and the morphology of MOF rods
has been retained after the oxidation (Fig. S10 in ESIz). Further-
more, the active catalyst species did not leach into solution which
was confirmed by performing the reaction with a solution pre-
pared by filtrating a MOF rod suspension in MC after shaking for
24 h. We next investigated the influence of the size of MOF rods
on the catalytic activities because the active catalytic sites may be
located only on the external surface which is affected by the size of
crystallites. As shown in Table 2, the TONs decreased upon
increasing the size of MOF rods. The same behaviors have been
observed when the relatively bigger substrates (Z)- and
(E)-stilbenes are used. These observations suggest that most of
the catalytic reactions occur on the external surface of MOF rods
and the number of active catalytic sites varies with the size of
crystallites. However, the size-selectivity has been also observed.
For example, the TONs of reactions with (E)-stilbene decreased
significantly compared to those with styrene cases, while the TONs
of the reactions with (Z)-stilbene decreased moderately. This
observation suggests that the MOF rods provide non-negligible
size of cavities which do not allow the bigger substrate to enter but
the smaller one, albeit in a significantly changed TONs. Although
the MOF rods show outstanding catalytic activity together with
long lifetime, they allow most of the reactions to occur on their
external surfaces and provide non-negligible size of cavities where
smaller substrates may enter and react.
Notes and references
1 (a) E. W. Berg and A. Alam, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1962, 27, 454;
(b) X. Zhao, B. Xiao, A. J. Fletcher, K. M. Thomas, D. Bradshaw
and M. J. Rosseinsky, Science, 2004, 306, 1012.
2 M. Oh and C. A. Mirkin, Nature, 2005, 438, 651.
3 (a) A. Carne, C. Carbonell, I. Imaz and D. Maspoch, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2011, 40, 291; (b) A. M. Spokoyny, D. Kim, A. Sumrein and
C. A. Mirkin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1218.
4 (a) S. Diring, S. Furukawa, Y. Takashima, T. Tsuruoka and
S. Kitagawa, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 4531; (b) Z. Xin, J. Bai,
Y. Pan and M. J. Zaworotko, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 13049.
5 L. G. Qiu, Z. Q. Li, Y. Wu, W. Wang, T. Xu and X. Jiang, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 3642.
6 P. Horcajada, T. Chalati, C. Serre, B. Gillet, C. Sebrie, T. Baati,
J. F. Eubank, D. Heurtaux, P. Clayette, C. Kreuz, J.-S. Chang,
Y. K. Hwang, V. Marsaud, P.-N. Bories, L. Cynober, S. Gil,
G. Ferey, P. Couvreur and R. Gref, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 172.
7 K. M. L. Taylor-Pashow, J. D. Rocca, R. C. Huxford and W. Lin,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 5832.
8 (a) D. Jiang, T. Mallat, F. Krumeich and A. Baiker, Catal.
Commun., 2011, 12, 602; (b) L. H. Wee, S. R. Bajpe,
N. Janssens, I. Hermans, K. Houthoofd, C. E. A. Kirschhock
and J. A. Martens, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 8186.
9 L. Ma, C. Abney and W. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1248.
10 S.-W. Kim, M. Kim, W. Y. Lee and T. Hyeon, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 7642.
11 (a) J. Xia, S. Yuan, Z. Wang, S. Kirklin, B. Dorney, D.-J. Liu and
L. Yu, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 3325; (b) X.-S. Wang, L. Meng,
Q. Cheng, C. Kim, L. Wojtas, M. Chrzanowski, Y.-S. Chen,
X. P. Zhang and S. Ma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 16322.
12 (a) M.-H. Xie, X.-L. Yang and C.-D. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 5521; (b) M.-H. Xie, X.-L. Yang, C. Zou and C.-D. Wu, Inorg.
Chem., 2011, 50, 5318.
13 C. Y. Lee, O. K. Farha, B. J. Hong, A. A. Sarjeant, S. T. Nguyen
and J. T. Hupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 15858.
14 M. L. Merlau, M. d. P. Mejia, S. T. Nguyen and J. T. Hupp,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4239.
15 (a) N. E. Leadbeater and M. Marco, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 3217;
(b) D. E. De Vos, M. Dams, B. F. Sels and P. A. Jacobs, Chem.
Rev., 2002, 102, 3615.
In summary, we have developed a new class of narrowly
dispersed nanosize hexagonal MOF rods from a Mn(III)–porphyrin
and In(III). The length of MOF rods has been easily controlled
16 S. J. Lee, K. L. Mulfort, X. Zuo, A. J. Goshe, P. J. Wesson,
S. T. Nguyen, J. T. Hupp and D. M. Tiede, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 836.
Table 2 TONs of various olefin oxidations with MOF rods obtained
at 120 1C at various reaction timesa
17 (a) S. Yang, X. Lin, A. J. Blake, G. S. Walker, P. Hubberstey, N. R.
Champness and M. Schroder, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 487; (b) G. Zhou,
Y. Yang, R. Fan, W. Cao and B. Yang, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 193.
18 E.-H. Ryu, J. H. Lee, Y. S. Lee, J.-M. Gu, S. Huh and S. J. Lee,
Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2011, 14, 1648.
19 S. J. Lee, J. T. Hupp and S. T. Nguyen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 9632.
20 S. Hasegawa, S. Horike, R. Matsuda, S. Furukawa, K. Mochizuki,
Y. Kinoshita and S. Kitagawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
2607.
2 min
5 min
10 min
30 min
60 min
Styrene
(Z)-Stilbene
(E)-Stilbene
1054
899
615
1003
881
614
957
861
596
926
842
563
905
821
528
a
Reaction conditions; olefin: 0.48 mmol, oxidant (2-tert-butylsulfo-
nyliodosylbenzene): 0.24 mmol, MOF rods: 0.24 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 mmol
(2000 : 1000 : 1), CH2Cl2: 1 mL, reaction time: 3 h, rt.
c
5514 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5512–5514
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012