T. Nuijens et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3777–3779
3779
Table 4
Straathof, A. J. J.; Jongejan, J. A.; Heijnen, J. J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12411–
12418.
6. Chen, S. T.; Jang, M. K.; Wang, K. T. Synthesis 1993, 858–860.
7. Boeriu, C. G.; Frissen, A. E.; Boer, E.; Kekem, K.; van Zoelen, D.-J.; Eggen, I. F. J.
Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2010, 66, 33–42.
C-terminal amidation of Tyr-Met-Asp-Phe using Alcalase-CLEA in tBuOH/DMF (82.5/
17.5, v/v)a,13
Entry
Amide product
Yield (%)
8. The reaction mixture was analyzed by HPLC-MS and all resulting peaks could
be identified. Area distribution: 4% Cbz-Phe-Leu-Ala-OH (starting material),
81% Cbz-Phe-Leu-Ala-NH2 (product), 9% Cbz-Phe-Leu-NH2, 4% Cbz-Phe-Leu-OH
and 2% Cbz-Phe-NH2.
1
2
3
Ac-Trp(Boc)-Met-Asp(tBu)-Phe-NH2
77
68
63
H-Trp(Boc)-Met-Asp(tBu)-Phe-NH2
b
H-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2
9. Using ammonium benzoate: Cal-B (100 mg) was added to a mixture of Cbz-Xaa-
OH (50 mg), ammonium benzoate (10 equiv) and 3 Å MS (200 mg) in toluene
(6 mL). The mixture was shaken at 50 °C, 150 rpm for 16 h.
a
Yield after purification by preparative HPLC.15
Using 2.1 equiv of NH3 in 1,4-dioxane.
b
Using NH3 gas: NH3 gas was bubbled through a solution of tripeptide (50 mg) in
toluene (6 mL) for 30 s. Subsequently, Cal-B (100 mg) and 3 Å MS (200 mg)
were added. The mixture was shaken at 50 °C, 150 rpm for 16 h.
10. After the enzymatic conversion of Cbz-Ala-OH the reaction mixture was
filtered and the Cal-B enzyme particles resuspended in MeOH followed by
filtration (3 Â 5 mL). The combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo.
The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using
MeOH/CH2Cl2 (7/93 v/v) as the eluent. The pure fractions were combined,
concentrated in vacuo and the volatiles co-evaporated with toluene (2Â) and
CHCl3 (2Â). Cbz-Ala-NH2 was obtained in 87% yield.
Both diagnostic peptides Sincalide and Pentagastrine contain
16
the C-terminal sequence Tyr-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2 which is a gen-
eral motif of gastrin-related peptides. As a first approach we exam-
ined the amidation of the fully protected peptide (Table 4, entry 1).
Its carboxylic acid congener is easily accessible by SPPS and is
highly soluble in anhydrous organic solvents. Despite the presence
of two bulky side-chain protecting groups, the peptide acid was
well recognized by alcalase-CLEA and smoothly converted into its
corresponding amide. The same peptide sequence, with a free N-
terminal amine (entry 2), was also amidated without side reac-
tions. This result is important, since side-chain protected peptides
with a C-terminal primary amide and an unprotected N-terminus
are very useful building blocks for chemical peptide fragment
condensation, for example in the synthesis of the pharmaceutical
peptide products Fuzeon and Exenatide.17 Finally, the unprotected
tetrapeptide (entry 3) was also amidated in a good yield, without
amidation of the aspartic acid side-chain.
11. (a) Nuijens, T.; Cusan, C.; Kruijtzer, J. A. W.; Rijkers, D. T. S.; Liskamp, R. M. J.;
Quaedflieg, P. J. L. M. Synthesis 2009, 809–814; (b) Nuijens, T.; Kruijtzer, J. A.
W.; Cusan, C.; Rijkers, D. T. S.; Liskamp, R. M. J.; Quaedflieg, P. J. L. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2719–2721; (c) Nuijens, T.; Cusan, C.; Kruijtzer, J. A.
W.; Rijkers, D. T. S.; Liskamp, R. M. J.; Quaedflieg, P. J. L. M. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 5145–5150.
12. Sheldon, R. A. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 1583–1587.
13. Alcalase-CLEA (50 mg, washed once with dry tBuOH and once with MTBE) was
added to
a mixture of peptide (0.10 mmol) and 2 N NH3 in 1,4-dioxane
(0.11 mmol) in tBuOH/DMF (5 mL, 82.5/17.5 v/v). The mixture was shaken at
50 °C, 150 rpm for 16 h.
14. When twice the amount of enzyme was used for the amidation of Cbz-Val-Ala-
OH, the HPLC conversion was 98%. The reaction mixture was filtered and the
solid enzyme particles were resuspended in MeOH (3 Â 5 mL) and in EtOAc
(25 mL) followed by filtration. The combined organic layers were washed with
saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (50 mL), brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4,
concentrated in vacuo and the volatiles co-evaporated with toluene
(2 Â 50 mL) and CHCl3 (2 Â 50 mL). Cbz-Val-Ala-NH2 was obtained in a yield
of 89%.
In conclusion, we have shown for the first time, that amino
acids and peptide acids can be enzymatically converted into their
C-terminal amide congeners directly using Cal-B or Subtilisin A.
The amidation is high yielding and competitive with other func-
tional groups and is independent of the presence of protecting
groups.
15. Ac-Trp(Boc)-Met-Asp(OtBu)-Phe-NH2: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d = 1.35 (s,
9H), 1.62 (s, 9H), 1.77–1.94 (m, 5H), 2.01 (s, 3H), 2.28–2.45 (m, 2H), 2.61–2.68
(m, 1H), 2.79–3.09 (m, 4H), 4.26–4.41 (m, 2H), 4.50–4.64 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.33
(m, 9H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.17–8.24 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d = 14.5, 27.6,
29.2, 32.5, 37.2, 49.4, 51.6, 51.8, 53.7, 80.2, 83.6, 113.3, 114.7, 119.4, 122.3,
124.4, 125.6, 126.2, 127.9, 129.0, 129.8, 134.8, 137.6, 148.9, 168.0, 169.2, 169.7,
170.1, 172.4; TFA.H-Trp(Boc)-Met-Asp(OtBu)-Phe-NH2: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
300 MHz): d = 1.36 (s, 9H), 1.63 (s, 9H), 1.68–1.95 (m, 2H), 2.03 (s, 3H), 2.64–
2.81 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.05 (m, 2H), 3.11–3.21 (m, 1H), 4.10–4.21 (m, 1H), 4.36–
4.48 (m, 2H), 4.55–4.63 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.37 (m, 9H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.78 (d,
J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.00–8.10 (m, 5H), 8.40 (d, J = 7.8 Hz,
1H), 8.90 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d = 14.5, 22.4, 26.9,
27.6, 29.3, 31.7, 37.3, 49.5, 52.0, 52.5, 53.8, 80.2, 83.4, 114.5, 116.6, 119.4,
122.3, 123.8, 124.2, 126.1, 128.0, 129.0, 130.2, 134.5, 137.7, 149.0, 169.3, 169.4,
169.7, 170.8, 171.5, 172.6; TFA.H-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
300 MHz): d = 1.68–1.90 (m, 2H), 1.96 (s, 3H), 2.80–2.92 (m, 2H), 3.01–3.13 (m,
2H), 3.14–3.20 (m, 1H), 3.94–4.05 (m, 1H), 4.28–4.40 (m, 2H), 4.46–4.53 (m,
1H), 6.95–7.32 (m, 11H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.88–7.94 (m, 4H), 8.32 (d,
J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 10.9 (s, 1H), 12.3 (s, 1H); 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): d = 14.5, 16.8, 27.3, 29.3, 32.3, 35.9, 36.4, 37.3, 49.5, 51.8,
52.4, 53.8, 106.7, 111.4, 118.4, 121.0, 125.0, 126.1, 127.0, 128.0, 129.0, 136.2,
137.7, 168.4, 167.0, 170.3, 171.9, 172.5.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mr. Math Boesten B.Sc. for his analytical
support and Dr. Claudia Cusan for fruitful discussions.
References and notes
1. Wollack, J. W.; Zeliadt, N. A.; Mullen, D. G.; Amundson, G.; Geier, S.; Falkum, S.;
Wattenberg, E. V.; Barany, G.; Distefano, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
7293–7303.
ˇ
ꢀ
ˇ
2. (a) Cerovsky, V.; Kula, M. R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1885–1887; (b)
ˇ
ꢀ
ˇ
Cerovsky, V.; Kula, M. R. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2001, 33, 181–187.
3. Bernatowicz, M. S.; Daniels, S. B.; Köster, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4645–
4648.
4. Bailén, M. A.; Chinchilla, R.; Dodsworth, D. J.; Nájera, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 9809–9813.
5. (a) Litjens, M. J. J.; Straathof, A. J. J.; Jongejan, J. A.; Heijnen, J. J. Chem. Commun.
1999, 1255–1256; (b) De Zoete, M. C.; Kock-van Dalen, A. C.; van Rantwijk, F.;
Sheldon, R. A. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1999, 2, 19–25; (c) Du, W.; Zong, M.; Guo,
Y.; Liu, D. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2003, 38, 107–110; (d) Litjens, M. J. J.;
16. (a) Ziessman, H. A.; Tulchinsky, M.; Lavely, W. C.; Gaughan, J. P.; Allen, T. W.;
Maru, A.; Parkman, H. P.; Maurer, A. H. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 277–281; (b)
Bergant, D.; Hocevar, M. Acta Chir. Iugosl. 2003, 50, 121–124.
17. Góngora-Benítez, M.; Cristau, M.; Giraud, M.; Tulla-Puche, J.; Albericio, F. Chem.
Commun. 2012, 48, 2313–2315.