10.1002/cssc.202000536
ChemSusChem
COMMUNICATION
C=O characteristic peak of cinnamic aldehyde 2a has an 8 cm-1
red-shift in the presence of rcu-Al2O3 support, indicating there is
a weak interaction between support and substrate (see Figure
S18). This weak interaction might be beneficial for the formation
of copper enolate intermediate, which leads to good 1,4-
selectivity.
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation
of China (NSFC, No. 21802134 and No. 21603025), National
Science and Technology Major Project (2017-IIⅠ-0005-0030)
and DICP (DICP I201932). We also thank the BL 14 W beamline
at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).
A deuterium labeling experiment with enal 2a and CD3OD
as the alcohol additive was further examined (Scheme S1a).[27]
The reaction afforded [D]-3a with deuterium incorporated at the
α-position. Comparetively, the control experiment of H/D
exchange after 3a formed was also conducted (Scheme S1b)
and no [D]-3a product was detected, proving that a copper
enolate intermediate was substantially generated in the boration
addition step of enals.
On the basis of the above experiments, a synthesis
pathway of homoallylboronates is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 3. The Cu1/rcu-Al2O3 catalyst initially reacts with B2pin2
1 in the presence of K3PO4 to generate Cu-Bpin species A.
Addition of A to enals 2 leads to the copper enolate intermediate
B/C. Subsequent protonation of B/C by MeOH affords 3 and
copperalkoxide D. The further Witting-reactions between 3 and 4
forms the target products 5, and the interaction of D with 1
regenerates the catalytically active species A to accomplish the
catalytic cycle.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: Coordinatively Unsaturated Al2O3 •copper • single-
atom catalyst • homoallylborane • selective boration
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
J. Shan, M. Li, L. F. Allard, S. Lee, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Nature
2017, 551, 605-608.
L. Lin, W. Zhou, R. Gao, S. Yao, X. Zhang, W. Xu, S. Zheng, Z. Jiang,
Q. Yu, Y. Li, Nature 2017, 544, 80-83.
R. Long, Y. Li, Y. Liu, S. Chen, X. Zheng, C. Gao, C. He, N. Chen, Z. Qi,
L. Song, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4486-4492.
C. Wang, X. Gu, H. Yan, Y. Lin, J. Li, D. Liu, W. Li, J. Lu, ACS Catal.
2017, 7, 887-891.
Y. Chen, S. Ji, Y. Wang, J. Dong, W. Chen, Z. Li, R. Shen, L. Zheng, Z.
Zhuang, D. Wang, Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 7041-7045; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6937-6941.
[6]
[7]
W. Liu, Y. Chen, H. Qi, L. Zhang, W. Yan, X. Liu, X. Yang, S. Miao, W.
Wang, C. Liu, A. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. 2018, 130,
7189-7193; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7071-7075.
J. Li, S. Chen, N. Yang, M. Deng, S. Ibraheem, J. Deng, J. Li, L. Li, Z.
Wei, Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 7109-7113; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2019, 58, 7035-7039.
[8]
[9]
X. F. Yang, A. Q. Wang, B. T. Qiao, J. Li, J. Y. Liu, T. Zhang, Acc.
Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1740-1748.
P. X. Liu, Y. Zhao, R. X. Qin, S.G. Mo, L. Gu, D. M. Chevrier, P. Zhang,
Q. Guo, D. D. Zang, B. H. Wu, G. Fu, N. F. Zheng, Science 2016, 352,
797-800.
[10] R. Lang, T. Li, D. Matsumura, S. Miao, Y. Ren, Y. Cui, Y. Tanm B. Qiao,
L. Li, A. Wang, X. Wang, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 16288-
16292; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 16054-16058.
[11] W. Liu, L. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Liu, X. Yang, S. Miao, W. Wang, A. Wang,
T. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10790-10798.
[12] Y. Byun, J. Yan, A. S. A. Madhoun, J. Johnsamuel, W. Yang, R. F.
Barth, S. Eriksson, W. Tjarks, J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1188-1198.
[13] I. Beletskaya, C. Moberg, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2320-2354.
[14] a) Q. B. Jiang, T. L. Guo, R. L. Gao, Q. N. Wang, J. Lou, Z. K. Yu, J.
Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 7981-7993; b) E. C. Neeve, S. J. Geier, I. A. I.
Mkhalid, S. A. Westcott, T. B. Marder, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9091-
91 1 c) . ern nde , . ds. Whiting, Synthesis and Applications of
Organoboron Compounds, Topics in Organometallic Chemistry,
Springer, Heidelberg, 2015; d) J. A. Schiffner, K. Müther, M. Oestreich,
Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 1214-1216; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
1194-1196.
Scheme 3. Proposed reaction mechanism.
In conclusion, coordinatively unsaturated Al2O3 supported
Cu single-atom catalyst with high Cu loading of 8.7 wt% was
prepared and used for highly selective synthesis of
homoallylboranes as the first heterogeneous catalyst. The Cu
SAC exhibited up to 99% conversion and 95% 1,4-selectivity in
the selective β-boration of the enals and afforded the
homoallylboranes up to 68% isolated yield, which were
comparable with the reported homogenous catalyst but more
efficient and stable than nano Cu/γ-Al2O3. Cu-Bpin species was
identified to be the active center of selective boration. Due to the
easy separation and recyclability, the utilization of SACs paves
an efficient and green path toward selective synthesis of
homoallylborane fine chemicals.
[15] D. G. Hall, Boronic Acids. Preparation, Applications in Organic
Synthesis and Medicine, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
[16] a) I. Ibrahem, P. Breistein, A. Córdova, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123,
12242-12247; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12036-12041; b) I.
Ibrahem, P. Breistein, A. Córdova, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 5175-5179.
[17] N. Tang, Y. Cong, Q, Shang, C. Wu, G. Xu, X. Wang, ACS Catal. 2017,
7, 5987-5991.
[18] Y. Liu, Z. Li, Q. Yu, Y. Chen, Z. Chai, G. Zhao, S. Liu, W. Cheong, Y.
Pan, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, L. Zheng, Y. Wang, Y. Lu, D. Wang, C. Chen, Q.
Peng, Y. Liu, L. Liu, J. Chen, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9305-
9311.
Acknowledgements
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.